Jump to content


Photo

Sony PMW-350K


  • Please log in to reply
1 reply to this topic

#1 Chris Tangey

Chris Tangey
  • Basic Members
  • PipPip
  • 13 posts
  • Cinematographer
  • Alice Springs Australia

Posted 16 February 2010 - 09:49 PM

I am almost certainly going to buy one of these units soon, but am wondering whether I will really need a nanoflash unit as well. While I am sure the big broadcasters will accept this 4:2:0 machine for
HD broadcast I am thinking of putting together an extensive file library of outback Australia over the next few years. Would it really be a selling advantage to have the nanoflash 4:2:2 footage with the much higher 100mbs data rate. If so how would you store it all without breaking the bank?
Thanks a lot for your input.
  • 0

#2 Michael K Bergstrom

Michael K Bergstrom
  • Basic Members
  • PipPip
  • 98 posts
  • Grip
  • Anchorage, Alaska

Posted 01 March 2010 - 10:38 PM

Unless you're shooting a lot of really fast action, I wouldn't get it. I haven't had an issue with people accepting 4:2:0 footage, and the only difference I can tell with these cameras with the nano flash recorder is cleaner, crisper fast action. If you are shooting interviews and b-roll it's useless in my opinion.
  • 0


Metropolis Post

Opal

rebotnix Technologies

Paralinx LLC

CineLab

Visual Products

The Slider

Ritter Battery

Tai Audio

Wooden Camera

Rig Wheels Passport

Broadcast Solutions Inc

Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS

Abel Cine

Technodolly

Glidecam

Gamma Ray Digital Inc

Willys Widgets

CineTape

Aerial Filmworks

FJS International, LLC

Technodolly

CineLab

Wooden Camera

Opal

Visual Products

Paralinx LLC

Glidecam

CineTape

Willys Widgets

Ritter Battery

The Slider

Broadcast Solutions Inc

FJS International, LLC

rebotnix Technologies

Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS

Rig Wheels Passport

Tai Audio

Aerial Filmworks

Gamma Ray Digital Inc

Metropolis Post

Abel Cine