Jump to content


Photo

Red Pro Zoom Lenses


  • Please log in to reply
8 replies to this topic

#1 Keith Tippit

Keith Tippit

    New

  • Basic Members
  • Pip
  • 2 posts
  • Cinematographer
  • Spanish Fort, AL

Posted 02 March 2010 - 08:24 PM

We're purchasing a Red camera and I'm wondering about your experiences with Red Pro zoom lenses. There is a thread on the primes that got a lot of positive feedback but the jury seems to be out on the zooms. Thoughts?

Since this is my first post (long-time lurker) I feel compelled to thank you all, especially David Mullen and similar posters for all the valuable information I've gleaned over the years. It's much appreciated.
  • 0

#2 John Brawley

John Brawley
  • Sustaining Members
  • 834 posts
  • Cinematographer
  • Atlanta Georgia

Posted 03 March 2010 - 08:18 PM

We're purchasing a Red camera and I'm wondering about your experiences with Red Pro zoom lenses. There is a thread on the primes that got a lot of positive feedback but the jury seems to be out on the zooms. Thoughts?

Since this is my first post (long-time lurker) I feel compelled to thank you all, especially David Mullen and similar posters for all the valuable information I've gleaned over the years. It's much appreciated.



I've tested a couple of the RED zooms, but never been able to choose them over other lenses on jobs where I've shot RED.

They are really excellent value for money, but there is a difference at the top end. I'm lucky enough to work on gigs that can afford to pay the premium price, but I always found them amazingly good optically (for the price), and perhaps a little bit of a let down in the actual mechanical side of things.

I think they are ideally suited to owner operators that will take good care of them.

jb
  • 0

#3 Josh Fritts

Josh Fritts
  • Basic Members
  • PipPip
  • 35 posts
  • Cinematographer
  • Los Angeles, CA

Posted 04 March 2010 - 12:41 AM

I have used the 18mm-85mm a couple times, but never on any projects of substantial importance. It blooms terribly in the highlights or around bright objects. I would put your money toward an older Angineux zoom that has been taken care off. You will be much more pleased.
  • 0

#4 Keith Tippit

Keith Tippit

    New

  • Basic Members
  • Pip
  • 2 posts
  • Cinematographer
  • Spanish Fort, AL

Posted 04 March 2010 - 11:56 AM

Thanks for the feedback. I was hoping for a bunch of rave reviews on the zooms so I could save 10k but I think maybe the primes are the way to go.

We're starting a low-budget feature at the end of the month. I can rent a good zoom for that if needed or maybe buy an older zoom as suggested. I've worked on a few shoots with the red camera and the DPs on those shoots rented a quality zoom.
  • 0

#5 Adrian Sierkowski

Adrian Sierkowski
  • Sustaining Members
  • 7373 posts
  • Cinematographer
  • Los Angeles, Ca

Posted 04 March 2010 - 12:18 PM

Zooms are complicated, hence expensive, and need to be more precise than a prime lens. I mean, in essence, you're making a lot of primes in one housing and trying to keep the same amount of light traveling through no matter what, and all falling onto the same spot. Go with primes for when you've got control of filming, and a zoom for those times when you don't. That's always my feeling.
  • 0

#6 Charley Weston

Charley Weston

    New

  • Basic Members
  • Pip
  • 2 posts
  • Digital Image Technician

Posted 30 March 2010 - 01:22 PM

Ever since we got our RPPs we've been favoring them over our zooms, and once our 18mm arrives to complete the set, we'll probably only bring out the RED 18-50 for handheld shoots, otherwise the Primes cover everything.
  • 0

#7 Dom Jaeger

Dom Jaeger
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1728 posts
  • Other
  • Melbourne, Australia

Posted 09 June 2010 - 01:44 AM

I've serviced a couple of RED zooms and not enjoyed the experience. They seem to be rehoused stills lenses, so optically they're not too bad (good enough for RED at least). But you'd be very lucky if you found one that held focus through a zoom, and the amount of backlash in the focus mechanism means that the scale is virtually useless. Also the entire zoom range is achieved in less than half a turn of the ring, so you've got no finesse available.
Even though they're dirt cheap for a Cine lens, you really get what you pay for. If you need a zoom I'd recommend hiring an older Angenieux every time.
  • 0

#8 Rob Skates

Rob Skates

    New

  • Basic Members
  • Pip
  • 3 posts
  • Camera Operator

Posted 24 June 2010 - 10:19 AM

The 18-50mm optics are fine. They project well. The mechanical quality is really poor. That is my opinion based on 4 examples of this lens that I've projected and examined. Including one that RED sent out as a loaner while the owners lens was being serviced for many weeks. Zoom barrel action is ok. The focus barrel action was stiff and gritty on all examples. All had good contrast and sharpness. No a one held focus during the zoom. All had issues with the focus mark accuracy. These lenses are not bad when treated as a variable primes and focused by eye. With these issues is it worth the price...

I've projected one example of the 18-85mm. Much better build quality than the 18-50mm. The action on the zoom and focus barrels was smooth. It had good contrast and sharpness. The example I projected had some back focus issues. Not sure if it came that way from Red or was dropped or mishandled by the owner. The two striking things about the lens is the quality of the PL mount. It seemed to be a very light grade aluminum instead of steel. The second thing was the giant front diameter 142mm???. For a lens in this focal length and physical length this is way big. A 110mm or 114mm would be more in line with other lenses in this focal range. 142mm limits you in terms of matte boxes and filter sizes.
  • 0

#9 Gunleik Groven

Gunleik Groven
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 117 posts
  • Camera Operator

Posted 11 July 2010 - 10:35 AM

But I guess the OP was asking about the "pro" zooms.

that's the 18-85 and the new 17-50

the old 18-50 and 50-150 have serious issues.

I thought the newer ones were much better, but have never had a chance to play with them...

Edited by Gunleik Groven, 11 July 2010 - 10:35 AM.

  • 0


Gamma Ray Digital Inc

The Slider

CineTape

Visual Products

Willys Widgets

New Pro Video - New and Used Equipment

Abel Cine

rebotnix Technologies

Metropolis Post

Tai Audio

Aerial Filmworks

FJS International, LLC

Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS

Paralinx LLC

Broadcast Solutions Inc

Wooden Camera

Glidecam

CineLab

Technodolly

Ritter Battery

Rig Wheels Passport

Broadcast Solutions Inc

Ritter Battery

Gamma Ray Digital Inc

Wooden Camera

CineLab

Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS

Paralinx LLC

FJS International, LLC

CineTape

Metropolis Post

The Slider

Technodolly

Visual Products

Aerial Filmworks

Glidecam

Rig Wheels Passport

rebotnix Technologies

Willys Widgets

Abel Cine

Tai Audio

New Pro Video - New and Used Equipment