Jump to content


Photo

very strange edge code latent image


  • Please log in to reply
6 replies to this topic

#1 Bill Munns

Bill Munns
  • Basic Members
  • PipPip
  • 53 posts
  • Other

Posted 18 March 2010 - 01:40 AM

I'm trying to identify a strange edge code I've found on four 100' loads filmed in 1967.

Since I can't seem to get the image upload to work here in this forum, the image can be seen at this URL:

http://www.bigfootfo...o...c=29111&hl=

Taking a wild guess, could it be something Fuji Film imbeds as a latent image in any of their stock?

Thanks for any ideas.

Bill
  • 0

#2 K Borowski

K Borowski
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 3905 posts
  • Camera Operator
  • I.A.T.S.E. Local # 600 Eastern Region

Posted 18 March 2010 - 10:09 AM

Bill, it's an EK with a subset C running through part of the K.


It's already been answered in the thread you refered us to, so I don't know why you're posting of it here. . .
  • 0

#3 Bill Munns

Bill Munns
  • Basic Members
  • PipPip
  • 53 posts
  • Other

Posted 18 March 2010 - 11:41 AM

When I posted it here, it had not been answered on the other forum.

Bill
  • 0

#4 Charles MacDonald

Charles MacDonald
  • Sustaining Members
  • 1157 posts
  • Other
  • Stittsville Ontario Canada

Posted 30 March 2010 - 10:47 PM

The copy that was made with the edges of the images ("camera code") masked off may have been made on a "lab Stock" which is different - perhaps in the Kodachrome family. In particular Kodak's own labs sometimes had stocks which were very uncomon in other labs.

Kodak was also known for adding "processed by Kodak" when they processed some films, again much more common on Kodachrome. Your EKC symbol may have been an example of this?
  • 0

#5 Brian Pritchard

Brian Pritchard
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 328 posts
  • Other
  • Stoke-on-Trent, UK

Posted 31 March 2010 - 02:52 PM

Kodak was also known for adding "processed by Kodak" when they processed some films, again much more common on Kodachrome. Your EKC symbol may have been an example of this?

My investigations so far agree with Charles that this was imprinted by Kodak when processing Kodachrome.
Brian
  • 0

#6 K Borowski

K Borowski
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 3905 posts
  • Camera Operator
  • I.A.T.S.E. Local # 600 Eastern Region

Posted 01 April 2010 - 01:15 PM

I'm pretty sure that none of this has anything to do with proving or disproving Bigfoot, which is Bill's sole purpose. . .
  • 0

#7 Brian Pritchard

Brian Pritchard
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 328 posts
  • Other
  • Stoke-on-Trent, UK

Posted 01 April 2010 - 01:51 PM

I'm pretty sure that none of this has anything to do with proving or disproving Bigfoot, which is Bill's sole purpose. . .

To me it is an interesting query and I want to find the answer. I really don't understand your post ; it doesn't help or add to the discussion in any way.
Brian
  • 0


rebotnix Technologies

Rig Wheels Passport

Willys Widgets

CineLab

Tai Audio

Technodolly

Metropolis Post

FJS International, LLC

Wooden Camera

Paralinx LLC

Ritter Battery

Abel Cine

Glidecam

CineTape

Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS

The Slider

Aerial Filmworks

Opal

Broadcast Solutions Inc

Visual Products

Gamma Ray Digital Inc

Aerial Filmworks

Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS

Tai Audio

Broadcast Solutions Inc

Ritter Battery

Wooden Camera

rebotnix Technologies

Metropolis Post

The Slider

Paralinx LLC

Willys Widgets

Technodolly

FJS International, LLC

CineLab

CineTape

Opal

Abel Cine

Visual Products

Rig Wheels Passport

Glidecam

Gamma Ray Digital Inc