Jump to content


Photo

Arri S vs CP16


  • Please log in to reply
4 replies to this topic

#1 Joe Riggs

Joe Riggs
  • Basic Members
  • PipPip
  • 68 posts
  • Student

Posted 30 April 2010 - 01:16 AM

Hello,

I have access to an Arri S and a CP16, and I was wondering which one would you choose to shoot on and why?

Thanks
  • 0

#2 Ian Cooper

Ian Cooper
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 469 posts
  • Other
  • England

Posted 30 April 2010 - 01:57 AM

...I have access to an Arri S and a CP16, and I was wondering which one would you choose to shoot on and why?...


I guess a certain amount might depend upon what it is you're wanting to shoot.

An Arri S is essentially a small hand-held non-crystal sync noisy MOS camera that takes internal 100ft loads. A CP16 is a larger shoulder mounted crystal sync 'silent' camera that takes 400ft magazine loads. Two rather different beasts.

Ok, the Arri can be fitted with a crystal sync motor, and can be fitted with a 400ft magazine (which makes it even louder), it also can be fitted in a blimp to make it quiet. The Arriflex also has the legendary Arri engineering & build quality making it very rugged and reliable.

What condition are both cameras in? - when were they last serviced/adjusted? In good condition both cameras are capable of producing fine films, but they are perhaps optimised and most suited to different situations.

If you want a fairly lightweight and reasonably discrete camera that doesn't draw much attention to itself, and you aren't trying to record sound, then perhaps the Arri might be best suited. If you don't mind something a little heavier, want to record sound, or need the convenience of 400ft loads, then perhaps you're better choosing the CP.
  • 0

#3 John Sprung

John Sprung
  • Sustaining Members
  • 4635 posts
  • Other

Posted 30 April 2010 - 02:09 AM

The Arri has pin registration, the CP doesn't.



-- J.S.
  • 0

#4 Brian Drysdale

Brian Drysdale
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 5070 posts
  • Cinematographer

Posted 30 April 2010 - 02:42 AM

Given that both cameras are in good condition, it really depends if you want to shoot dialogue and sync sound.
  • 0

#5 Tim Carroll

Tim Carroll
  • Sustaining Members
  • 2165 posts
  • Other
  • Chicago, Illinois

Posted 30 April 2010 - 08:33 AM

Horses for Courses, as they say.

If you let us know what you are trying to shoot, we might be able to be of more assistance. I think the differences with the cameras are laid out really well in the posts above. The only thing that wasn't covered is what glass is available for each camera? That would have a big impact on any decision I would make between those two.

If there is great glass available for one but not the other, I would try to work my shooting requirements around the one with the best available glass.

Best,
-Tim
  • 0


Ritter Battery

Willys Widgets

Metropolis Post

Gamma Ray Digital Inc

Visual Products

CineTape

Abel Cine

Broadcast Solutions Inc

Rig Wheels Passport

Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS

Paralinx LLC

Glidecam

CineLab

Aerial Filmworks

rebotnix Technologies

Wooden Camera

The Slider

FJS International, LLC

Technodolly

Tai Audio

Opal

Abel Cine

CineTape

Glidecam

rebotnix Technologies

Aerial Filmworks

Ritter Battery

Opal

FJS International, LLC

Rig Wheels Passport

Broadcast Solutions Inc

Paralinx LLC

Gamma Ray Digital Inc

The Slider

Willys Widgets

CineLab

Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS

Technodolly

Wooden Camera

Tai Audio

Metropolis Post

Visual Products