Posted 15 May 2010 - 11:17 AM
In any case, does anyone know how the "HDR"-ness of the dynamax sensor is meant to work?
Support Cinematography.com and buy gear using our Amazon links!
PANASONIC LUMIX GH5 Body 4K Mirrorless Camera, 20.3 Megapixels, Dual I.S. 2.0, 4K 422 10-bit, Full Size HDMI Out, 3 Inch Touch LCD, DC-GH5KBODY (USA Black)
Posted 15 May 2010 - 03:14 PM
Posted 15 May 2010 - 04:54 PM
It's not the exposure time that's varied but the sensitivity I think. Each pixel has two analogue amplifiers or outputs, a high gain and a low gain.
Posted 15 May 2010 - 07:07 PM
Could it have been the Alexa cameras that have the varied gain outputs? I was reading about this last night
“The key to the increased performance is what we call ‘Dual Read Out’ – we have on the sensor 32 output channels and we read every pixel twice through a normal gain and through a high gain. Each of these read outs happens in 14 bit depth. We then combine them and get 16 bit pixel depth for every pixel element. So that results in a very quiet image with very low noise. This is a philosophy which is similar to our scanner with its double flashing, however these read outs are happening at the same time.”
You're probably right though, it makes more sense to vary sensitivity rather than shutter speed to capture a high dynamic range
Posted 15 May 2010 - 08:02 PM
There was an interview with John Galt from PV sometime ago, and he mentioned the Dynamax HDR mode. He used the term exposure when he described it, so you'd think that means shutter speed.
The Dynamax has up to six sets of RGB per pixel, so that's six exposures combined into one frame.
Posted 16 May 2010 - 02:14 PM
That seems like a logical, simple way of achieving what you're talking about.
In the stills world, Fuji had a SuperCCD sensor which used some photosites that were I believe smaller than the rest to achieve a similar thing.
Posted 17 May 2010 - 10:28 PM
Posted 24 November 2011 - 08:36 AM
Today, that's only available in the still photography world. DynaMax is designed to do that for moving images. With those 6 red, 6 green and 6 blue photosites for each output pixel, you'll have the equivalent of shooting 6 images with different exposures at once, and blend them together to create a single high dynamic range image. You'll be able to capture extreme highlights, the near highlights, the mid highlights....
Today, that's only available in the still photography world. DynaMax is designed to do that for moving images. With those 6 red, 6 green and 6 blue photosites for each output pixel, you'll have the equivalent of shooting 6 images with different exposures at once, and blend them together to create a single high dynamic range image. You'll be able to capture extreme highlights, the near highlights, the mid highlights...."
Read more here:
Posted 24 November 2011 - 08:58 AM
Today, that's only available in the still photography world.
The Epic sort of combines two exposures when using HDRx, using two exposure times.
Posted 05 March 2012 - 03:50 PM
Posted 10 July 2012 - 02:45 AM
Today I heard that Panavision were bringing out some sort of revolutionary camera around the end of this year. Unfortunately the person who told me this doesn't really know much about cameras, it was just something they were told.
Any other news regarding this sensor or a successor to the Genesis? It's a bit long in the tooth at this point and is outclassed by the Alexa and Epic.
Panavision Imaging (a company they bought a few years back) does make some interesting high-performance sensors, but up until now, they've all been fairly low resolution types, mostly designed for money-is-no-oblect military and surveillance projects.
I heard they were working on some new high-performance "Backside Illumination" CMOS sensors for digital cinematography applications.
If they can pull that off, it will get Panavision more or less back into the situation they used to enjoy, where they made the best film cameras, and only rented, not sold.
If they can make something with the imaging performance of the Alexa, but in 4K, after 30-odd years of piss-farting around with endless generations of "indistinguishable from film" second-rate video formats, they might finally be onto something.
Or will this be another magic bullet that never quite makes it out of the barrel....