Cinematography.com: Buying a DVX 100a - Cinematography.com

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Buying a DVX 100a I want to make sure I don't get ripped off

#1 User is offline   Stephen Floyd 

  • PipPip
  • Group: Basic Members
  • Posts: 11
  • Joined: 12-May 10
  • Occupation:Student

Posted 24 May 2010 - 03:45 PM

I have contacted a local seller on craigslist about buying a DVX 100a for aroud $1,100. I'm pretty sure I can tell if the camera is in working condition, but what should I look for to tell if this guy in on the level? He says no one but me has expressed interest in buying the camera, and I could not find his name or email address on any searches I conducted. Should any of that matter as long as the camera works?
0

#2 User is offline   Chris Keth 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Basic Members
  • Posts: 4220
  • Joined: 01-November 04
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Los Angeles
  • Interests:Photography, fly fishing and fly tying, hiking, camping, shooting and hunting
  • Occupation:1st Assistant Camera

Posted 24 May 2010 - 05:03 PM

View PostPhantomoftheOMSI, on 24 May 2010 - 03:45 PM, said:

I have contacted a local seller on craigslist about buying a DVX 100a for aroud $1,100. I'm pretty sure I can tell if the camera is in working condition, but what should I look for to tell if this guy in on the level? He says no one but me has expressed interest in buying the camera, and I could not find his name or email address on any searches I conducted. Should any of that matter as long as the camera works?


Look at the tape hours and ask about a service record. If it's more than maybe a couple hundred hours and it's never been serviced, I'd pass.
0

#3 User is offline   Jonathan Bowerbank 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Basic Members
  • Posts: 2698
  • Joined: 19-September 06
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:San Francisco, CA
  • Interests:Movies
  • Occupation:Cinematographer / DP

Posted 24 May 2010 - 06:06 PM

Save your money, buy a T2i :)
0

#4 User is offline   Stephen Floyd 

  • PipPip
  • Group: Basic Members
  • Posts: 11
  • Joined: 12-May 10
  • Occupation:Student

Posted 08 June 2010 - 11:16 PM

I ended up getting the camera and it has worked out great. The gentleman I bought it from had been using it for wedding videos and said he was sick of making them. I'm going to use it for digital shorts, and I have already found use for it as a "B" camera on a local feture production.

Thanks for the help.
0

#5 User is offline   Chris Burke 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Basic Members
  • Posts: 790
  • Joined: 24-May 04
  • Location:Boston, MA

Posted 14 July 2010 - 04:39 AM

View PostStephen Floyd, on 08 June 2010 - 11:16 PM, said:

I ended up getting the camera and it has worked out great. The gentleman I bought it from had been using it for wedding videos and said he was sick of making them. I'm going to use it for digital shorts, and I have already found use for it as a "B" camera on a local feture production.

Thanks for the help.



why did you spend 1100 on an SD camera. You could have purchase a lot more camera for that amount of money.
0

#6 User is offline   Adrian Sierkowski 

  • Group: Sustaining Members
  • Posts: 3565
  • Joined: 08-May 06
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Philadelphia, PA; USA
  • Interests:To light or not to light
  • Occupation:Cinematographer / DP

Posted 14 July 2010 - 05:07 AM

Not really for video cameras. DVXs are still going for 'round 1500 these days, used, from BH, and despite it being SD it still has a place in production-- especially documentary or for-web video where vDSLRs and even "hd" systems don't quite fit.
0

#7 User is offline   Phil Rhodes 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Basic Members
  • Posts: 6945
  • Joined: 26-December 03
  • Gender:Male
  • Occupation:Other

Posted 14 July 2010 - 08:29 AM

Quote

You could have purchase a lot more camera for that amount of money.



I'm not so sure about that, either. The DVX was and is a really, really seriously good little SD camera. It is certainly a much better SD camera than most of the current crop are as HD cameras. The Sony EX series, the Canon equivalent, even the JVC stuff (although they're not -as- bad) have a lot of pixels and not much else. The DVX is a genuinely nice camera and I can see buying one if you have that very specific specific need for a 4:3 SD machine.


P
0

Share this topic:


Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users


Scan this QR Code with your phone and then add the page to your mobile favorites!
Cinematography.com
Mobile Access!