Buying a DVX 100a
I want to make sure I don't get ripped off
-
Group:
Basic Members
-
Posts:
11
-
Joined:
12-May 10
-
Occupation:Student
Posted 24 May 2010 - 03:45 PM
I have contacted a local seller on craigslist about buying a DVX 100a for aroud $1,100. I'm pretty sure I can tell if the camera is in working condition, but what should I look for to tell if this guy in on the level? He says no one but me has expressed interest in buying the camera, and I could not find his name or email address on any searches I conducted. Should any of that matter as long as the camera works?
0
-
Group:
Basic Members
-
Posts:
4220
-
Joined:
01-November 04
-
Gender:Male
-
Location:Los Angeles
-
Interests:Photography, fly fishing and fly tying, hiking, camping, shooting and hunting
-
Occupation:1st Assistant Camera
Posted 24 May 2010 - 05:03 PM
PhantomoftheOMSI, on 24 May 2010 - 03:45 PM, said:
I have contacted a local seller on craigslist about buying a DVX 100a for aroud $1,100. I'm pretty sure I can tell if the camera is in working condition, but what should I look for to tell if this guy in on the level? He says no one but me has expressed interest in buying the camera, and I could not find his name or email address on any searches I conducted. Should any of that matter as long as the camera works?
Look at the tape hours and ask about a service record. If it's more than maybe a couple hundred hours and it's never been serviced, I'd pass.
0
-
Group:
Basic Members
-
Posts:
2698
-
Joined:
19-September 06
-
Gender:Male
-
Location:San Francisco, CA
-
Interests:Movies
-
Occupation:Cinematographer / DP
Posted 24 May 2010 - 06:06 PM
Save your money, buy a T2i
0
-
Group:
Basic Members
-
Posts:
11
-
Joined:
12-May 10
-
Occupation:Student
Posted 08 June 2010 - 11:16 PM
I ended up getting the camera and it has worked out great. The gentleman I bought it from had been using it for wedding videos and said he was sick of making them. I'm going to use it for digital shorts, and I have already found use for it as a "B" camera on a local feture production.
Thanks for the help.
0
-
Group:
Basic Members
-
Posts:
790
-
Joined:
24-May 04
-
Location:Boston, MA
Posted 14 July 2010 - 04:39 AM
Stephen Floyd, on 08 June 2010 - 11:16 PM, said:
I ended up getting the camera and it has worked out great. The gentleman I bought it from had been using it for wedding videos and said he was sick of making them. I'm going to use it for digital shorts, and I have already found use for it as a "B" camera on a local feture production.
Thanks for the help.
why did you spend 1100 on an SD camera. You could have purchase a lot more camera for that amount of money.
0
-
Group:
Sustaining Members
-
Posts:
3565
-
Joined:
08-May 06
-
Gender:Male
-
Location:Philadelphia, PA; USA
-
Interests:To light or not to light
-
Occupation:Cinematographer / DP
Posted 14 July 2010 - 05:07 AM
Not really for video cameras. DVXs are still going for 'round 1500 these days, used, from BH, and despite it being SD it still has a place in production-- especially documentary or for-web video where vDSLRs and even "hd" systems don't quite fit.
0
-
Group:
Basic Members
-
Posts:
6945
-
Joined:
26-December 03
-
Gender:Male
-
Occupation:Other
Posted 14 July 2010 - 08:29 AM
Quote You could have purchase a lot more camera for that amount of money.
I'm not so sure about that, either. The DVX was and is a really, really seriously good little SD camera. It is certainly a much better SD camera than most of the current crop are as HD cameras. The Sony EX series, the Canon equivalent, even the JVC stuff (although they're not -as- bad) have a lot of pixels and not much else. The DVX is a genuinely nice camera and I can see buying one if you have that very specific specific need for a 4:3 SD machine.
P
0
Share this topic:
1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users
|
Cinematography.com Mobile Access!
|