Jump to content


Photo

Mixing Super 16mm with standard 16mm


  • Please log in to reply
5 replies to this topic

#1 Phil Thompson

Phil Thompson
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 318 posts
  • Cinematographer

Posted 05 December 2010 - 11:30 AM

HI there,

I am in the process of making a super 16mm feature. Unfortunately all shooting relies on having the DOP available as he as the Ari 2 camera. I have a cinema products standard 16mm camera and would like to shoot my own stuff to incorporate in the final cut. My question is, what is the impact of doing this? Obviously I won't be getting a 35mm blow up and it's likely that I'll try and get the neg final cut re-scanned at 2K but what impact will this have on the standard 16mm stuff?

Anyone had this issue?

many thanks

Phil Thompson
  • 0

#2 Adrian Sierkowski

Adrian Sierkowski
  • Sustaining Members
  • 7117 posts
  • Cinematographer
  • Los Angeles, Ca

Posted 05 December 2010 - 11:57 AM

You can do it, just frame for 1.85:1 on the reg 16mm and matte it later on. of course, grain may differ, as you'll be enlarging the 16mm frame but i'd just go with a stop slower stock, (eg instead of 500T go 200T, though that's really 1 1/3 stop diff, or 100T instead of 200T). Since you'll wind up in the DI anyway, there won't be too much of an issue I can forsee.
  • 0

#3 Phil Connolly

Phil Connolly
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 377 posts
  • Director
  • London

Posted 05 December 2010 - 12:06 PM

If your composing for 1.85:1 the difference in negative area is very significant, super 16 is about 55% larger. So on a 2K scan your going have a very noticeable increase in grain and drop in resolution. I guess this could be minimized to an extent by using the slowest possible stocks for the reg 16, but its still going to be pretty noticeable.

If you are going to do this I would probably not try and match the formats as they won't inter cut that well, but maybe heighten the differences - make the different textures look intentional.

I few years back I shot a project that mixed D-20 HDCAM SR, Super 16 and Super 8 - non of the formats matched but the end result looked ok - because the different textures looked intentional. I used film for flash backs and dream sequences and the HD for real time sequences.
  • 0

#4 Phil Thompson

Phil Thompson
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 318 posts
  • Cinematographer

Posted 05 December 2010 - 12:12 PM

If your composing for 1.85:1 the difference in negative area is very significant, super 16 is about 55% larger. So on a 2K scan your going have a very noticeable increase in grain and drop in resolution. I guess this could be minimized to an extent by using the slowest possible stocks for the reg 16, but its still going to be pretty noticeable.

If you are going to do this I would probably not try and match the formats as they won't inter cut that well, but maybe heighten the differences - make the different textures look intentional.

I few years back I shot a project that mixed D-20 HDCAM SR, Super 16 and Super 8 - non of the formats matched but the end result looked ok - because the different textures looked intentional. I used film for flash backs and dream sequences and the HD for real time sequences.



Thanks for both of your responses, great stuff. Im not looking for grain conformity TBH - it's a very slash and hack film, what i was slightly concerned about was the aspect ratio. Obviously Standard 16mm is 4:3 whilst Super is 16:8 - I don't really want to 'pop' in and out of aspect ratios. I'm not the DOP, the director so i maybe missing something fundamental here.??
  • 0

#5 Adrian Sierkowski

Adrian Sierkowski
  • Sustaining Members
  • 7117 posts
  • Cinematographer
  • Los Angeles, Ca

Posted 05 December 2010 - 12:30 PM

you would just mask the 16mm to S16mm, same as when you're shooting full 4 perf 35mm film and going for a 1.85 ratio. That can easily be done in Final Cut Pro, for example, but is best accomplished in the scan as you can "move around" the frame a bit.
  • 0

#6 Kevith Mitchell

Kevith Mitchell
  • Basic Members
  • PipPip
  • 48 posts
  • Camera Operator

Posted 30 December 2010 - 01:16 PM

I would have the same concerns to. I would ask several HD houses and see what they say. Because chances are high they will charge you in some way for the format change. and it won't be cheap. Your best and least expesive route is to shoot on one format. This will eliminate the problem before it starts. Hope this helps
  • 0


Opal

The Slider

Wooden Camera

Broadcast Solutions Inc

CineLab

Visual Products

Glidecam

Aerial Filmworks

Gamma Ray Digital Inc

Willys Widgets

Tai Audio

Paralinx LLC

Metropolis Post

Rig Wheels Passport

Technodolly

Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS

Abel Cine

rebotnix Technologies

CineTape

FJS International, LLC

Ritter Battery

Aerial Filmworks

Rig Wheels Passport

Paralinx LLC

Metropolis Post

Tai Audio

Technodolly

FJS International, LLC

Glidecam

Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS

Visual Products

CineTape

Wooden Camera

Opal

The Slider

CineLab

Abel Cine

rebotnix Technologies

Ritter Battery

Broadcast Solutions Inc

Gamma Ray Digital Inc

Willys Widgets