Jump to content


Photo

Excalibur


  • Please log in to reply
37 replies to this topic

#1 David Mullen ASC

David Mullen ASC
  • Sustaining Members
  • 20073 posts
  • Cinematographer
  • Los Angeles

Posted 06 March 2011 - 12:45 PM

One of my favorite works of cinematography is coming out this week on blu-ray!
http://www.dvdbeaver...bur_blu-ray.htm

Nothing else to say, just that I'm excited.
  • 0

#2 Sean Lambrecht

Sean Lambrecht
  • Sustaining Members
  • 77 posts
  • Gaffer
  • Milwaukee / Chicago

Posted 06 March 2011 - 05:53 PM

Seconded! Years ago I got a great deal on a case for 4x5 filters which happened to include a full set of Tiffen low con filters. My first thought was, "Excalibur... sweet..."

Errr, did Thomson use low cons on Excalibur?
  • 0

#3 David Mullen ASC

David Mullen ASC
  • Sustaining Members
  • 20073 posts
  • Cinematographer
  • Los Angeles

Posted 06 March 2011 - 07:04 PM

Seconded! Years ago I got a great deal on a case for 4x5 filters which happened to include a full set of Tiffen low con filters. My first thought was, "Excalibur... sweet..."

Errr, did Thomson use low cons on Excalibur?


Maybe somewhere, but mainly he used Harrison Black Dot Texture Screens (sort of a forerunner to something like Classic Soft Blacks) and sometimes a white net on the back of the lens.

"Barry Lyndon" was mostly shot with a #3 Low-Con, except for the f/0.7 candlelight shots. A few shots also had a net on the lens, I don't know front or back. The wedding scene, for example, and I think the bath scene where Barry comes in and kisses Lady Lyndon in the bathtub in the daytime.
  • 0

#4 Sean Lambrecht

Sean Lambrecht
  • Sustaining Members
  • 77 posts
  • Gaffer
  • Milwaukee / Chicago

Posted 07 March 2011 - 01:05 AM

Interesting, thanks David. Wow, those Harrison filters are really something. I want a set!

Posted Image
  • 0

#5 John Holland

John Holland
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 2273 posts
  • Cinematographer
  • London England

Posted 07 March 2011 - 12:33 PM

Just been trying Harrison Double Fog with my Eos 550d/ T21 . Do like what iam seeing .
  • 0

#6 Ignacio Aguilar

Ignacio Aguilar
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 410 posts
  • Cinematographer
  • Madrid, Spain

Posted 28 March 2011 - 05:11 PM

I just read this interview with art director, set decorator & production designer Roger Christian, where he briefly talks about the early involvement of "Alien" cinematographer Derek Vanlint with "Excalibur". Wasn't it Tony Pierce-Roberts who was replaced by Alex Thomson when the shooting had already begun?
  • 0

#7 Roberto Hernandez

Roberto Hernandez
  • Basic Members
  • PipPip
  • 71 posts
  • Student
  • Orlando, Florida

Posted 26 April 2011 - 03:13 AM

A few shots also had a net on the lens, I don't know front or back.

What is difference visually when using netting over the front or behind the lens? Do you know if popular cinematographers like Janusz Kaminski prefer one over the other. What technique for netting the lens do you prefer?
  • 0

#8 Brian Hulnick

Brian Hulnick
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 358 posts
  • Sound Department

Posted 19 May 2011 - 02:06 AM

Interesting, thanks David. Wow, those Harrison filters are really something. I want a set!

Posted Image


Those filters look unbelievable. You'd think the images would be unusable.
  • 0

#9 Richard Boddington

Richard Boddington
  • Sustaining Members
  • 5508 posts
  • Director

Posted 19 May 2011 - 01:54 PM

The score for this movie was terrific. And I love that shot of the hand of the Lady Of The Lake pulling the sword back down underwater, I've always wondered how they did that shot? The sword just goes straight down.

R,
  • 0

#10 David Mullen ASC

David Mullen ASC
  • Sustaining Members
  • 20073 posts
  • Cinematographer
  • Los Angeles

Posted 19 May 2011 - 03:21 PM

The score for this movie was terrific. And I love that shot of the hand of the Lady Of The Lake pulling the sword back down underwater, I've always wondered how they did that shot? The sword just goes straight down.

R,


I think they built a mechanical rig for the sword and fake hand/arm poking out of the water and going back down, but for that shot where Percival tosses the sword and the hand catches it at the end, I think that was a reversed shot, the sword was yanked out of the hand.
  • 0

#11 Joseph Arch

Joseph Arch
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 230 posts
  • Director

Posted 20 May 2011 - 01:46 AM

Why do you enjoy these types of films David. The old films.
  • 0

#12 Mitch Gross

Mitch Gross
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 2873 posts
  • Cinematographer

Posted 20 May 2011 - 09:15 AM

Why do you enjoy these types of films David. The old films.

Um, maybe because it's a good movie?

And it's not so terribly old. I remember when it came out as I presume David does.
  • 0

#13 Joseph Arch

Joseph Arch
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 230 posts
  • Director

Posted 20 May 2011 - 09:19 AM

I am guessing because they used a tripod and you can actually see what's happening.
  • 0

#14 Richard Boddington

Richard Boddington
  • Sustaining Members
  • 5508 posts
  • Director

Posted 20 May 2011 - 10:15 AM

I am guessing because they used a tripod and you can actually see what's happening.


Ha, good one. When I was making Dark Reprieve a lot of people asked me if I would do it all handheld. I said no I was breaking with tradition and it would all be tri-pod mounted shots.

R,
  • 0

#15 Joseph Arch

Joseph Arch
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 230 posts
  • Director

Posted 20 May 2011 - 10:43 AM

How did they react?
  • 0

#16 Dom Jaeger

Dom Jaeger
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1728 posts
  • Other
  • Melbourne, Australia

Posted 20 May 2011 - 11:12 AM

Ha, good one. When I was making Dark Reprieve a lot of people asked me if I would do it all handheld. I said no I was breaking with tradition and it would all be tri-pod mounted shots.

R,


That's what I like about you Richard, you're a true rebel. You probably shot it on some weird medium like film too. ;)
  • 0

#17 Richard Boddington

Richard Boddington
  • Sustaining Members
  • 5508 posts
  • Director

Posted 20 May 2011 - 11:15 AM

I know crazy! I even used this new device called a dolly, and another new invention....the camera jib. It makes the shots like all crazy smooth and stuff.

R,
  • 0

#18 Adrian Sierkowski

Adrian Sierkowski
  • Sustaining Members
  • 7373 posts
  • Cinematographer
  • Los Angeles, Ca

Posted 20 May 2011 - 12:09 PM

Pfft; where's the realism in that! We all know you're not cool Richard unless you shoot on something Digital; because that's where it's at obviously. I heard some people say so!
  • 0

#19 Michel Hafner

Michel Hafner
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 300 posts
  • Other

Posted 21 May 2011 - 12:28 AM

One of my favorite works of cinematography is coming out this week on blu-ray!
http://www.dvdbeaver...bur_blu-ray.htm

Nothing else to say, just that I'm excited.

Unfortunately it's not properly framed... :-(
  • 0

#20 Brian Hulnick

Brian Hulnick
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 358 posts
  • Sound Department

Posted 30 May 2011 - 09:51 AM

Why do you enjoy these types of films David. The old films.


Many "Old" movies are timeless classics. Not a lot of today's crop will past the test of time me thinks.
  • 0


Wooden Camera

CineTape

Technodolly

Aerial Filmworks

Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS

The Slider

Broadcast Solutions Inc

New Pro Video - New and Used Equipment

Ritter Battery

Gamma Ray Digital Inc

Metropolis Post

Willys Widgets

Tai Audio

rebotnix Technologies

Abel Cine

Rig Wheels Passport

FJS International, LLC

Visual Products

Paralinx LLC

Glidecam

CineLab

Willys Widgets

Paralinx LLC

Glidecam

CineTape

CineLab

FJS International, LLC

rebotnix Technologies

Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS

Broadcast Solutions Inc

Tai Audio

New Pro Video - New and Used Equipment

Abel Cine

Technodolly

Aerial Filmworks

Visual Products

Metropolis Post

Gamma Ray Digital Inc

Rig Wheels Passport

Wooden Camera

Ritter Battery

The Slider