Jump to content


Photo

Arri Std Mnt Anamorphics


  • Please log in to reply
4 replies to this topic

#1 Bruce Toscano

Bruce Toscano

    New

  • Basic Members
  • Pip
  • 4 posts
  • Other

Posted 03 May 2011 - 05:03 PM

If anyone has any leads on anamorphic lenses in Arri Standard Mounts I would greatly appreciate it. Thanks!
  • 0

#2 Dom Jaeger

Dom Jaeger
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1604 posts
  • Other
  • Melbourne, Australia

Posted 03 May 2011 - 09:29 PM

Zeiss made Standard mount anamorphics for the Arri 2C back in the 50s under the name Ultrascope. We have a set at the rental house I work for - they're quite nice really. Sadly they never get used.

I believe both Joe Dunton Cameras and Technovision made anamorphics utilising Cookes, some of which might be in Std mount. The Dunton ones were called Crystal Express.
  • 0

#3 John Sprung

John Sprung
  • Sustaining Members
  • 4635 posts
  • Other

Posted 04 May 2011 - 12:35 AM

Arri also had a front of the lens anamorphic adapter that worked with the regular set of primes back in those days. Not a whole bunch of fun, it was heavy, and you had to keep moving it back and forth.




-- J.S.
  • 0

#4 Edward Goldner

Edward Goldner
  • Basic Members
  • PipPip
  • 36 posts
  • Cinematographer
  • Melbourne

Posted 04 May 2011 - 05:06 AM

Hey Dom,

How do the Ultrascopes compare to the Lomos in terms of sharpness?

Cheers,
Ed
  • 0

#5 Dom Jaeger

Dom Jaeger
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1604 posts
  • Other
  • Melbourne, Australia

Posted 04 May 2011 - 09:32 PM

Hi Ed,

in their current state the Ultrascope set we have aren't as sharp as properly calibrated Lomos. I think they need some tweaking to get the anamorphic elements exactly aligned, but I've never had the time to do it. Currently they're fine stopped down about 3 stops. But from projecting them they look like with a bit of work they would come up as well if not better than Lomos. They seem to have better contrast wide open, and no edge drop off.

They are a bit smaller and lighter than Lomos, and about as fast (f2 on the 40 and 50mm, f2.8 on the 85, f4 on the 135). Because they are square front (front focusing anamorphic) they get the mumps, like square front Lomos (ie the squeeze factor alters slightly depending on the focus distance). That also means they would get strong anamorphic flaring.

I'm actually quite curious as to how good they could be. They have the Zeiss build quality, which is superior to Lomo of course.
  • 0


Metropolis Post

Technodolly

Aerial Filmworks

Opal

Tai Audio

Rig Wheels Passport

The Slider

Broadcast Solutions Inc

Ritter Battery

Visual Products

CineLab

Abel Cine

Glidecam

FJS International, LLC

CineTape

Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS

Wooden Camera

Paralinx LLC

Willys Widgets

rebotnix Technologies

Gamma Ray Digital Inc

Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS

Technodolly

CineLab

rebotnix Technologies

The Slider

Willys Widgets

Rig Wheels Passport

Wooden Camera

Paralinx LLC

Broadcast Solutions Inc

Visual Products

Metropolis Post

Opal

Aerial Filmworks

Tai Audio

FJS International, LLC

Glidecam

Gamma Ray Digital Inc

CineTape

Abel Cine

Ritter Battery