Jump to content


Photo

The most expensive camera of the 1960s.


  • Please log in to reply
2 replies to this topic

#1 Michael Schroers

Michael Schroers
  • Basic Members
  • PipPip
  • 99 posts
  • Producer

Posted 29 October 2011 - 06:13 AM

Hello,

I want to ask which 16mm camera was the most expensive and 'high end' in the 1960s.

Someone told me, the Arriflex 16 ST and 16 SR was the Standard in Quality at this time and already the
most used camera (especially in europe) .
But the Mitchell cameras like the DSR-16 and the SSR-16 would have been more expensive than the
Arriflex and a little bit better in image quality, too.

Is that true ?

Edited by Michael Schroers, 29 October 2011 - 06:14 AM.

  • 0

#2 Tim Carroll

Tim Carroll
  • Sustaining Members
  • 2168 posts
  • Other
  • Chicago, Illinois

Posted 29 October 2011 - 06:26 AM

The Arriflex 16SR was not made in the 1960's, it didn't come out until later.

The Arriflex 16S was definitely one of the better 16mm cameras from that period. Don't know much about the Mitchell or it's cost. The limiting factor in image quality for 16mm production in the 1960's was glass. There weren't nearly as many lens choices, or I should say High End lens choices back then. The Zeiss Super Speed lenses for 16mm weren't developed until later. You had the Cooke Kinetal lenses, the Schneider Cine lenses, and the original Zeiss Cine lenses, and a few Rodenstocks, and Kilfits, but the limiting factor in image quality from that period was the lenses.

Best,
-Tim
  • 0

#3 Michael Schroers

Michael Schroers
  • Basic Members
  • PipPip
  • 99 posts
  • Producer

Posted 29 October 2011 - 09:34 AM

The Arriflex 16SR was not made in the 1960's, it didn't come out until later.

The Arriflex 16S was definitely one of the better 16mm cameras from that period. Don't know much about the Mitchell or it's cost. The limiting factor in image quality for 16mm production in the 1960's was glass. There weren't nearly as many lens choices, or I should say High End lens choices back then. The Zeiss Super Speed lenses for 16mm weren't developed until later. You had the Cooke Kinetal lenses, the Schneider Cine lenses, and the original Zeiss Cine lenses, and a few Rodenstocks, and Kilfits, but the limiting factor in image quality from that period was the lenses.

Best,
-Tim


And which lenses ?

I Think the most expensive lenses were the Zeiss and Cookes, the cheapest the Rodenstocks. But Rodenstock only made 3 for Arri, the 16mm, the 25mm and the 50.

Edited by Michael Schroers, 29 October 2011 - 09:37 AM.

  • 0


The Slider

Glidecam

FJS International, LLC

Paralinx LLC

Gamma Ray Digital Inc

rebotnix Technologies

Broadcast Solutions Inc

CineLab

Willys Widgets

Tai Audio

CineTape

Abel Cine

Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS

Rig Wheels Passport

Visual Products

New Pro Video - New and Used Equipment

Wooden Camera

Aerial Filmworks

Ritter Battery

Metropolis Post

Technodolly

CineTape

Gamma Ray Digital Inc

FJS International, LLC

Metropolis Post

Paralinx LLC

Willys Widgets

Aerial Filmworks

New Pro Video - New and Used Equipment

Tai Audio

Rig Wheels Passport

CineLab

Technodolly

Visual Products

The Slider

Abel Cine

rebotnix Technologies

Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS

Glidecam

Broadcast Solutions Inc

Ritter Battery

Wooden Camera