widescreen 16:9 to fake 2.35:1 aspect ratio of sony ex3 full raster resolution
Posted 15 January 2012 - 02:27 PM
Posted 16 January 2012 - 12:59 AM
Posted 16 January 2012 - 01:44 AM
817 x 1920 or 1080 x 2538 ?
Remember that in recording something at a x b resolution you're not going to be able to get any more resolution than a x b. Simply blowing something up, might give you more pixels via interpolation, but not more resolving power (anamorphics just do this on one axis and are not immune when it comes to digital acquisition).
There are tricks to get you more apparent resolution, but for whatever footage they work really well with there will be an example of a situation where they don't.
Posted 17 January 2012 - 08:21 PM
Edited by Thangjam Bicky Chengleicha, 17 January 2012 - 08:23 PM.
Posted 17 January 2012 - 09:27 PM
I thought i might use black bars along with 1920*1080p resolution so that it looks like 2.35:1
Which will give you 817 x 1920 image resolution...
Just frame it appropriately (in many cases it's as simple as people using tape on the LCD ...) then then letterbox it in post.
But remember this isn't 'full raster resolution', you'd need to shoot anamorphic for that, but then you're going to be chopping off the sides to get back to 2.35 anyway.