Jump to content


Photo

Red 4K WS (2.33:1) for festival screening


  • Please log in to reply
6 replies to this topic

#1 Albert Smith

Albert Smith
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 151 posts
  • Cinematographer
  • Chicago

Posted 14 March 2012 - 05:03 PM

I have a film we are coloring now shot on red in 4k widescreen with the weirdo aspect ratio 2.33:1, My question is what to output this for festival screening since most still do HDcam. We have a in house Davicini lite suite and since it can really only handle 1080 regardless of it only outputting 1080 anyways.... we need to decide if it's worth it to take it elsewhere and finish in 2k scope or something.


Anyone have any experience with this? It seems it might not really be worth it and we should probably just finish it in 1080 and letterbox it, but it does hurt my heart a little to keep losing resolution. What about anamorphic projection....squishing the whole picture onto hdcam?


thanks for any insight.
  • 0

#2 Adrian Sierkowski

Adrian Sierkowski
  • Sustaining Members
  • 7117 posts
  • Cinematographer
  • Los Angeles, Ca

Posted 14 March 2012 - 05:12 PM

I'd output it 1920x1080 matted to your desired aspect ratio if it's just for fest screening; from there you can also author BR and DVD. That's just me.
  • 0

#3 Bruce Greene

Bruce Greene
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 489 posts
  • Cinematographer
  • Los Angeles

Posted 14 March 2012 - 07:30 PM

Dcp spec is 2048x858 or 2.39:1. I'm not sure you can fit your aspect ratio into it without pillar boxing.

An anamorphic lens in front of a digital projector will most likely cut your resolution noticeably.

If you render to 1920x1080 from the 4k original it should look about the same resolution as 2k, so that would be my suggestion.
  • 0

#4 Jock Blakley

Jock Blakley
  • Basic Members
  • PipPip
  • 73 posts
  • Other
  • Melbourne, VIC

Posted 16 April 2012 - 07:59 PM

Even though the ratio is wrong you can still get a 2K (or 4K, for that matter) DCP finish. You could keep the standard 858 high and pillar-box. Then during presentation the projectionist can at the very least bring the side maskings in (and ideally set up a new masking file on the projector to match the shape and position of the screen masking)

Alternately go for 2048 width and let the height follow. Then during presentation a new lens and masking file would be needed but you'd keep the full resolution, and venues that show it using the standard 'scope set-up would simply show a 2.4:1 crop.
  • 0

#5 Benjamin Kantor

Benjamin Kantor

    New

  • Basic Members
  • Pip
  • 9 posts
  • Cinematographer
  • Los Angeles

Posted 22 April 2012 - 02:38 AM

Even though you could technically pillarbox or letterbox a DCP, it doesn't actually meet the written spec. So, it won't pass QC and likely won't be something a distributor would accept as a master. So, that raises the larger question of whether this version of the film is only for festival screenings, or if it's also your final master that will be handed over if the film is sold. If it's the latter, I would stick with a HDCAMSR, as you can cram any aspect ratio you want in there, and likely won't get any push-back from a potential distributor.
  • 0

#6 Jock Blakley

Jock Blakley
  • Basic Members
  • PipPip
  • 73 posts
  • Other
  • Melbourne, VIC

Posted 01 May 2012 - 09:31 AM

So the DCPs I've seen of GONE WITH THE WIND and THE WIZARD OF OZ and any other Academy Aperture films you care to mention should have been rejected by distributors?
  • 0

#7 David Mullen ASC

David Mullen ASC
  • Sustaining Members
  • 19760 posts
  • Cinematographer
  • Los Angeles

Posted 01 May 2012 - 10:55 AM

So the DCPs I've seen of GONE WITH THE WIND and THE WIZARD OF OZ and any other Academy Aperture films you care to mention should have been rejected by distributors?


You can read a little about the issue here:
http://www.film-tech...16/t000900.html
http://www.edcf.net/...ilm Formats.pdf

It appears that currently 1.37 Academy is fitted inside a 1.85 DCP container with side masking. A 2K DCP uses the full 2048 width for 2.39 movies or the full 1080 height for the other formats.

Obvious a distributor who wants to show "Gone with the Wind" will be fine with this, the question is whether a distributor buying an independent movie wants to deal with this. There was a recent movie "Meek's Cutoff" shot and shown in 1.37 Academy, but otherwise, distributors tend to frown upon non-current projection standards so there is a bit of a risk there, or at least, the risk is that it will get shown incorrectly.
  • 0


Gamma Ray Digital Inc

Wooden Camera

CineLab

Aerial Filmworks

Ritter Battery

Rig Wheels Passport

CineTape

Glidecam

Opal

FJS International, LLC

Tai Audio

Visual Products

Abel Cine

Technodolly

Paralinx LLC

Broadcast Solutions Inc

rebotnix Technologies

The Slider

Metropolis Post

Willys Widgets

Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS

Willys Widgets

Rig Wheels Passport

Aerial Filmworks

CineLab

Broadcast Solutions Inc

Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS

Ritter Battery

Technodolly

Visual Products

Gamma Ray Digital Inc

Glidecam

Abel Cine

Paralinx LLC

Tai Audio

FJS International, LLC

CineTape

Metropolis Post

Opal

Wooden Camera

rebotnix Technologies

The Slider