Jump to content


Photo

Converting HDCAMSR to DCP


  • Please log in to reply
4 replies to this topic

#1 Eugene Lehnert

Eugene Lehnert
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 203 posts
  • Other
  • New York, NY

Posted 20 April 2012 - 03:51 PM

If I have an HDCAMSR tape that is 1.85 or 2.35 how is it converted to a DCP? Is the HD image uprezzed to the 2K size or does the HD image sit inside the large 2K frame? And the color conversion is a simple 2D LUT to go from Rec709 to XYZ?
  • 0

#2 Benjamin Kantor

Benjamin Kantor
  • Basic Members
  • PipPip
  • 11 posts
  • Colorist
  • Los Angeles

Posted 22 April 2012 - 02:27 AM

Below is a sample workflow (I work at a post house where we occasionally make DCPs):

1. Ingest the HDCAM-SR as an uncompressed Quicktime (probably a Blackmagic 4:4:4 codec, in our case).

2. Scale the image to meet the DCP 2K standard (for 1.85:1, it's 1998×1080, for 2.39:1, it's 2048×858). To be clear, the image fills the entire frame, there is no letterboxing or pillarboxing.

3. Export as a TIF sequence.

4. We use OpenDCP, which semi-automatically takes the TIF sequence and converts it to a JPEG2000 sequence in XYZ color, and then wraps it up in an MXF wrapper for delivery.
  • 0

#3 Eugene Lehnert

Eugene Lehnert
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 203 posts
  • Other
  • New York, NY

Posted 23 April 2012 - 10:18 AM

Thanks. I would imagine the uprez to 2k would not be that noticeable? I guess it depends on what algorithm you use. What are your thoughts?
  • 0

#4 Benjamin Kantor

Benjamin Kantor
  • Basic Members
  • PipPip
  • 11 posts
  • Colorist
  • Los Angeles

Posted 23 April 2012 - 11:16 AM

Yes, from a scale perspective, we are talking about 9.4% to get it from 1080p to 2K, which I personally think is negligible. Also, if your film were playing in a theater off an HDCAMSR deck feeding to a 2K projector (like a Barco), it would be getting upsampled to 2K by the projector hardware anyway, so I don't know that there's a difference in the end result regardless.

If you really wanted to fine-tune the scaling algorithm, then something like B-spline is going to technically look better than Bicubic. However, it complicates the workflow. The four step workflow I mentioned before could probably be covered in 4 hours for a 2 hour tape, using just FCP or Premiere and a DCP application. Adding a B-spline step could more than double that time, as it would add a completely new, time consuming process in a different application (we would probably use Nuke or a Photoshop action).
  • 0

#5 Eugene Lehnert

Eugene Lehnert
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 203 posts
  • Other
  • New York, NY

Posted 23 April 2012 - 11:22 AM

Ok great. Thanks for the help and advice.
  • 0


Glidecam

Gamma Ray Digital Inc

Broadcast Solutions Inc

Technodolly

CineLab

Aerial Filmworks

FJS International, LLC

Tai Audio

Metropolis Post

New Pro Video - New and Used Equipment

Visual Products

Rig Wheels Passport

Ritter Battery

The Slider

Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS

Wooden Camera

Paralinx LLC

Willys Widgets

CineTape

Abel Cine

rebotnix Technologies

Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS

Rig Wheels Passport

Aerial Filmworks

Wooden Camera

Tai Audio

New Pro Video - New and Used Equipment

Broadcast Solutions Inc

The Slider

Technodolly

Paralinx LLC

rebotnix Technologies

Ritter Battery

Abel Cine

Willys Widgets

Visual Products

FJS International, LLC

Gamma Ray Digital Inc

CineLab

Glidecam

Metropolis Post

CineTape