Jump to content


Photo

RED taking Sony to court


  • Please log in to reply
12 replies to this topic

#1 Brian Drysdale

Brian Drysdale
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 5193 posts
  • Cinematographer

Posted 13 February 2013 - 04:47 PM

It seems that RED is suing Sony over patent infringement.

 

http://www.deadline....as/#more-429289


  • 0

#2 Adrian Sierkowski

Adrian Sierkowski
  • Sustaining Members
  • 7371 posts
  • Cinematographer
  • Los Angeles, Ca

Posted 13 February 2013 - 04:55 PM

I have the distinct feeling this might end badly for RED.


  • 0

#3 Matthew W. Phillips

Matthew W. Phillips
  • Sustaining Members
  • 1792 posts
  • Other

Posted 13 February 2013 - 05:15 PM

Desperate much?


  • 0

#4 Vadim Bobkovsky

Vadim Bobkovsky
  • Basic Members
  • PipPip
  • 26 posts

Posted 14 February 2013 - 12:37 AM

Let's see if they win this time, because Sony is no joke. It's not unheard of, though, Kodak lived on stuff like this for longer than I'm alive.


  • 0

#5 Keith Walters

Keith Walters
  • Sustaining Members
  • 2252 posts
  • Other
  • Sydney Australia

Posted 14 February 2013 - 06:04 PM

It seems that RED is suing Sony over patent infringement.

 

http://www.deadline....as/#more-429289

 

From the story:

"Days after settling an email-hacking lawsuit with rival camera makers ARRI..."

So when did that happen? The only reference I can find to such an event is on the Deadline Website.


  • 0

#6 Dom Jaeger

Dom Jaeger
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1725 posts
  • Other
  • Melbourne, Australia

Posted 14 February 2013 - 07:00 PM

From the story:

"Days after settling an email-hacking lawsuit with rival camera makers ARRI..."

So when did that happen? The only reference I can find to such an event is on the Deadline Website.

 

You've gotta look further than REDuser for all your news Keith!  :P

 

http://cinescopophil...with-prejudice/

http://nofilmschool....-f55-f5-camera/


  • 0

#7 Brian Drysdale

Brian Drysdale
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 5193 posts
  • Cinematographer

Posted 14 February 2013 - 07:24 PM

http://nofilmschool....-f55-f5-camera/

 

The SI-2K uses the Cineform Raw, which is mentioned here, presumably you'd be safe using that. If as it's suggested, it's about compressed RAW, I assume the Cineform RAW was around as a product when the RED patent was filed. 


  • 0

#8 Keith Walters

Keith Walters
  • Sustaining Members
  • 2252 posts
  • Other
  • Sydney Australia

Posted 15 February 2013 - 12:12 AM

You've gotta look further than REDuser for all your news Keith!  :P

 

http://cinescopophil...with-prejudice/

http://nofilmschool....-f55-f5-camera/

Tee bloody hee...

Those articles appeared after my post...

Well anyway, business as usual Plaintiff: 0, Defendant: 0, Lawyers $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

 

WTF times 20,000?!

RED are claiming to have invented a Video Camera...?

http://www.google.co...tents/US8358357

Like, a video camera? The one thing all the Reduser Chuckleheads emphatically insist the RED cameras are not! :blink:


  • 0

#9 Brian Drysdale

Brian Drysdale
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 5193 posts
  • Cinematographer

Posted 15 February 2013 - 08:47 AM

The patent seems to centre around at least 4K compressed RAW, so that would take the SI-2K out of any conflict.


  • 0

#10 Keith Walters

Keith Walters
  • Sustaining Members
  • 2252 posts
  • Other
  • Sydney Australia

Posted 15 February 2013 - 09:15 PM

-Deleted by KW 17 Feb 2012-


  • 0

#11 rob spence

rob spence
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 427 posts
  • Other
  • Beaconsfield

Posted 20 February 2013 - 02:05 PM

Even more ridiculous things have happened...like the time arri took aaton to court over a swivelling eyepiece.


  • 0

#12 Brian Drysdale

Brian Drysdale
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 5193 posts
  • Cinematographer

Posted 20 February 2013 - 03:49 PM

Patents allow you to protect your intellectual property. I believe the Aaton V/F was being able to flip it from one side to the other, which was in the Arri patent, although I gather you could break a pin in your new camera to achieve this function if you wanted to. Possibly the best well known industry patent was for the Steadicam, which was defended on a number of occasions.


  • 0

#13 rob spence

rob spence
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 427 posts
  • Other
  • Beaconsfield

Posted 21 February 2013 - 12:56 PM

Absolutely. les bosher told me that aaton got round the problem by fitting the tension screw to the eyepiece. that did it apparently.


  • 0


CineTape

FJS International, LLC

New Pro Video - New and Used Equipment

CineLab

Rig Wheels Passport

Tai Audio

Aerial Filmworks

Metropolis Post

Technodolly

The Slider

Ritter Battery

Wooden Camera

Abel Cine

Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS

Paralinx LLC

Gamma Ray Digital Inc

Willys Widgets

Glidecam

Broadcast Solutions Inc

rebotnix Technologies

Visual Products

Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS

FJS International, LLC

Glidecam

Rig Wheels Passport

Paralinx LLC

New Pro Video - New and Used Equipment

Metropolis Post

Ritter Battery

Aerial Filmworks

Technodolly

The Slider

CineTape

CineLab

Wooden Camera

Tai Audio

rebotnix Technologies

Gamma Ray Digital Inc

Willys Widgets

Visual Products

Broadcast Solutions Inc

Abel Cine