Jump to content


Photo

Moonrise Kingdom 200t unfiltered


  • Please log in to reply
5 replies to this topic

#1 Elias Markkula

Elias Markkula

    New

  • Basic Members
  • Pip
  • 4 posts

Posted 09 October 2013 - 05:58 AM

Hi,

 

Robert Yeoman says in this article that they shot the whole film with vision3 200t stock and did not use any filtration besides an ND filter. 

 

http://www.studiodai...onrise-kingdom/

 

So it's good to shoot tungsten stocks in daylight without 85 filter and correct in post?

 


  • 0

#2 Paul Bartok

Paul Bartok
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 223 posts
  • Cinematographer

Posted 09 October 2013 - 06:16 AM

You could but It just seems lazy not todo it, I think you also affect the grain doing that though Im not 100% sure on that
  • 0

#3 Elias Markkula

Elias Markkula

    New

  • Basic Members
  • Pip
  • 4 posts

Posted 09 October 2013 - 06:46 AM

Do you think that they made the choice of shooting unfiltered because of lazyness?


  • 0

#4 Mark Dunn

Mark Dunn
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 2670 posts
  • Other
  • London

Posted 09 October 2013 - 08:28 AM

David Mullen will explain it better, but you get a very underexposed blue record, so one assumes a very grainy sky.


  • 0

#5 David Mullen ASC

David Mullen ASC
  • Sustaining Members
  • 20074 posts
  • Cinematographer
  • Los Angeles

Posted 09 October 2013 - 10:36 AM

They probably made that choice in order to shoot as much of the movie on 200T stock even in bad weather, to save on the 2/3-stop loss of the 85, plus it sounds like they wanted a lot of depth of field and stopped down when possible.

 

Sort of the opposite, by pulling the 85 filter outside, you have an overexposed blue record and underexposed reds.  Correcting that tends to get you noisier reds, and if you overexposed the blue sky too much, some scanner noise in the blues.  But film has a lot of latitude.

 

I'm just surprised they didn't use the 85 filter -- pulling it is more common for movies that want a cooler cast (I didn't use an 85 filter on "Northfork" for example, it helpded pull some color out of the faces.)  In this case, the movie was digitally timed for a warm yellowish look so you'd have to push the channels past the blue to neutral correction even farther towards the yellow-red end.  But obviously the film negative held up fine to that.  It sounds like, from reading the ASC article, that the director decided on a warmer look than originally planned while shooting.

 

"Barry Lyndon" and "Heat" are famous movies that were shot on tungsten stock without the 85 filters.


  • 1

#6 John Holland

John Holland
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 2273 posts
  • Cinematographer
  • London England

Posted 09 October 2013 - 12:46 PM

Most of my work has been in UK, where i stopped using a 85 in the 80's just needed that extra speed without the 2/3 stop loss. If i am  shooting in a country with lot of sun and fantastic blue skies as i did in India March this year then yes i did use 85 and 85ND's .And yes its so easy to correct in post even more so now.


  • 0


FJS International, LLC

Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS

Abel Cine

Tai Audio

Broadcast Solutions Inc

Wooden Camera

CineLab

Glidecam

Gamma Ray Digital Inc

Visual Products

Paralinx LLC

The Slider

Willys Widgets

Metropolis Post

Technodolly

New Pro Video - New and Used Equipment

rebotnix Technologies

Rig Wheels Passport

Aerial Filmworks

Ritter Battery

CineTape

Aerial Filmworks

Rig Wheels Passport

CineLab

Paralinx LLC

Visual Products

rebotnix Technologies

Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS

Metropolis Post

Abel Cine

CineTape

Glidecam

Ritter Battery

Broadcast Solutions Inc

Gamma Ray Digital Inc

New Pro Video - New and Used Equipment

Willys Widgets

Technodolly

The Slider

Tai Audio

Wooden Camera

FJS International, LLC