Jump to content


Photo

Protector/UV Filters and image degradation


  • Please log in to reply
5 replies to this topic

#1 Alexandre de Tolan

Alexandre de Tolan
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 115 posts
  • Camera Operator
  • Sevilla, Spain

Posted 08 January 2014 - 07:31 PM

I'm starting this thread to ask what you all think about neutral/protector or UV filters constantly on on your lenses.

 

Even if using Tiffen, B+W, Hoya, Lee or any other top brand filter do you think that final IQ will be affected in some way?


  • 0

#2 Alexandre de Tolan

Alexandre de Tolan
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 115 posts
  • Camera Operator
  • Sevilla, Spain

Posted 10 January 2014 - 04:39 PM

Wow!… 84 views and 0 comments. Is it really that straightforward that don't even deserves a thought on this one?


  • 0

#3 Adrian Sierkowski

Adrian Sierkowski
  • Sustaining Members
  • 7118 posts
  • Cinematographer
  • Los Angeles, Ca

Posted 11 January 2014 - 12:59 AM

I would say most people don't keep any of those filters on their lenses at all times, since most of us will be using matteboxes. Maybe, on a red, for example, you may keep a hot mirror in, or an optical flat ect.


  • 0

#4 Alexandre de Tolan

Alexandre de Tolan
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 115 posts
  • Camera Operator
  • Sevilla, Spain

Posted 11 January 2014 - 10:06 AM

I would say most people don't keep any of those filters on their lenses at all times, since most of us will be using matteboxes. Maybe, on a red, for example, you may keep a hot mirror in, or an optical flat ect.

 

I realize that it isn't common to protect rented lenses. Only to care for them obviously. But when you have your own set naked front elements become a problem when you look at them every time you use those lenses. Or at least for me...

 

I've recently sold all but a couple of Nikkors I had and bought a set of 5 Zeiss ZF.2s which  I want them to last. I'm considering attaching Hoyas HD flats or UVs. Nonetheless I'm concerned with "side effects" from those filters on final IQ. I guess I can always remove them when shooting since I'll be doing that with MB almost of the time.


  • 0

#5 Adrian Sierkowski

Adrian Sierkowski
  • Sustaining Members
  • 7118 posts
  • Cinematographer
  • Los Angeles, Ca

Posted 11 January 2014 - 10:29 AM

Wouldn't you have lens caps on both sides of the lens when in storage anyway? But if it's for your own piece of mind, I would just get a optically clear filter from a good brand--- tiffen or Schneider or Formatt and worry less about image degradation as it would be minimal at best, the filter can be removed, and this is assuming the camera it's going on is actually discerning enough. 


  • 0

#6 Alexandre de Tolan

Alexandre de Tolan
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 115 posts
  • Camera Operator
  • Sevilla, Spain

Posted 11 January 2014 - 10:47 AM

Thanks for your input. Regarding the camera. It's for a Blackmagic cinema camera.


  • 0


Tai Audio

Rig Wheels Passport

Technodolly

Paralinx LLC

Gamma Ray Digital Inc

Willys Widgets

Metropolis Post

Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS

rebotnix Technologies

Ritter Battery

Abel Cine

Broadcast Solutions Inc

Opal

CineTape

Aerial Filmworks

Glidecam

FJS International, LLC

Visual Products

The Slider

Wooden Camera

CineLab

Gamma Ray Digital Inc

Rig Wheels Passport

FJS International, LLC

Paralinx LLC

Tai Audio

Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS

CineTape

Ritter Battery

Willys Widgets

The Slider

Glidecam

Aerial Filmworks

Broadcast Solutions Inc

rebotnix Technologies

Opal

CineLab

Visual Products

Metropolis Post

Technodolly

Wooden Camera

Abel Cine