Jump to content


Photo

Vision3 50d shot.

vision 3 50d super 8 fashion

  • Please log in to reply
23 replies to this topic

#1 Jose luis villar

Jose luis villar
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 136 posts
  • Cinematographer
  • SPAIN

Posted 21 January 2014 - 01:40 PM

Here is another fashion shot with 50d Vision 3. The telecine was done by Ochoypico, the camera used  my Beaulieu 4008 ZM2.

 


  • 6


#2 Zac Fettig

Zac Fettig
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 338 posts
  • Other
  • Boston

Posted 21 January 2014 - 02:38 PM

Beautiful! It looks amazing! Very clean picture. Makes me want to go out and shoot some 50D!


  • 0

#3 Mike Maliwanag

Mike Maliwanag
  • Basic Members
  • PipPip
  • 20 posts
  • Cinematographer
  • Los Angeles

Posted 21 January 2014 - 03:20 PM

Looks fantastic! What a great scan. I'm very surprised by the clean image!


  • 0

#4 David Cunningham

David Cunningham
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1048 posts
  • Cinematographer

Posted 21 January 2014 - 09:46 PM

Jose, that;s amazing!  How are you getting this so grain free!?  Are you using Neat Video to reduce the grain?

 

Your lighting and colorist (I assume you) are fantastic!  Can you tell me the secret?  I'm having a very difficult time with coloring my flat scans.


  • 0

#5 Gabriele Turchi

Gabriele Turchi
  • Basic Members
  • PipPip
  • 24 posts
  • Colorist

Posted 21 January 2014 - 10:47 PM

very impressive indeed . could be mistaken for 16mm .

i am curious about what scanner has been used 

 

thanks


  • 0

#6 Jose luis villar

Jose luis villar
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 136 posts
  • Cinematographer
  • SPAIN

Posted 22 January 2014 - 07:07 AM

Hi David, the color correction is very simple, is made with rgb curves in Premiere Pro, Neat application is minimal, I do not like to clean much grain because it creates an image plastic video.

Look at these screenshots,

 

z5d8.jpg

 

7syy.jpg

 

d4pn.jpg

 

 

Gabriele, the telecine is done in http://ochoypico.com/super8-telecine/


  • 2

#7 Matt Stevens

Matt Stevens
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 701 posts
  • Other

Posted 22 January 2014 - 10:05 AM

No doubt that looked like 16mm. 50D is wonderful stock.


  • 0

#8 David Cunningham

David Cunningham
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1048 posts
  • Cinematographer

Posted 22 January 2014 - 10:15 AM

Jose,

 

Thanks for the tips!  I'm going to try re-coloring my shots later tonight with your technique.  It looks simple and efficient!  I also have Neat, so I'll be adding that in too!

 

Thanks again!

 

Dave


  • 0

#9 Anthony Schilling

Anthony Schilling
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1047 posts
  • Camera Operator
  • Portland, OR

Posted 22 January 2014 - 01:23 PM

Wow, that looks good! I like the Neat noise settings you used, so thanks for sharing. The more i see and work with negatives S8, the less i miss reversal.


  • 0

#10 Will Montgomery

Will Montgomery
  • Sustaining Members
  • 2017 posts
  • Producer
  • Dallas, TX

Posted 22 January 2014 - 05:35 PM

I believe that model makes the film look good or is it the other way around?  :)


  • 1

#11 Robert Houllahan

Robert Houllahan
  • Sustaining Members
  • 1575 posts
  • Industry Rep
  • Providence R.I.

Posted 22 January 2014 - 09:10 PM

Nice!


  • 0

#12 David Cunningham

David Cunningham
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1048 posts
  • Cinematographer

Posted 22 January 2014 - 10:23 PM

Yeah, models definitely help.  :)


  • 0

#13 Bill DiPietra

Bill DiPietra
  • Sustaining Members
  • 2339 posts
  • Cinematographer
  • New York City

Posted 22 January 2014 - 10:36 PM

Yup, that fooled me!  Thought that was 16mm.  50D has always been my favorite color stock.


  • 0

#14 Marc Marti

Marc Marti
  • Basic Members
  • PipPip
  • 50 posts
  • Other

Posted 23 January 2014 - 05:55 PM

Amazing stuff... as always! ;)

 

Enhorabuena, José Luís!


  • 0

#15 Gabriele Turchi

Gabriele Turchi
  • Basic Members
  • PipPip
  • 24 posts
  • Colorist

Posted 24 January 2014 - 12:16 AM

very interesting ... the quality of the transfer seems very good , even tough from the specs seems to be a telecine and not even a data scanner ... nonetheless beautiful . I guess that the quality of the Beaulieu is an important factor too ...

 

i just shot some Vision 3 200T but i have not seen it yet because i was trying to get Pro8mm (considering that i got Film + processing + scan package ) to scan in LOG but they ended up saying that they cannot do it in LOG ... so i guess i have to look somewhere else ...

 

ps: was your telecine in HD , would you mind share just a couple of HD frames ? how did you get it back ? DPX or Qt?

 

thanks

g


  • 0

#16 Jeremy Parsons

Jeremy Parsons
  • Basic Members
  • PipPip
  • 37 posts
  • Cinematographer
  • Pittsburgh

Posted 24 January 2014 - 03:31 AM


...i just shot some Vision 3 200T but i have not seen it yet because i was trying to get Pro8mm (considering that i got Film + processing + scan package ) to scan in LOG but they ended up saying that they cannot do it in LOG ... so i guess i have to look somewhere else ...

 

Technically, an uncorrected film negative is something of a log image. It still has a slight contrast curve to it, but its still flatter than rec709 or if you made a projecting print. You'll never get a flat curve from film like that of a digital camera. You don't need to. Film generally has a higher dynamic range than digital to begin with and still preserves highlights better than most of todays digital cameras.

 

If you still really wanted it, the only way you're going to get a LOG looking image is if you use a DI film.

 

Thanks for reminding me about this stock. I have a roll of it in 35mm staring at me every time I open the fridge. I never thought to consider it for super-8. The grain holds up extremely well!. That is one sharp piece of glass!


  • 0

#17 Justin Donoghue

Justin Donoghue
  • Basic Members
  • PipPip
  • 36 posts
  • Other
  • Ireland

Posted 24 January 2014 - 04:38 AM

Beautiful transfer. I've yet to try 50D now I really must buy a few rolls.I'm always put off by the scan costs. It would be really interesting to see a scan of 50D going through the new super8 film camera being worked on when it comes out. I know unsteadiness is a quirk of super8 but if this stock went through that camera with it's proper film feed it would effectively be 16mm! 


  • 0

#18 Jose luis villar

Jose luis villar
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 136 posts
  • Cinematographer
  • SPAIN

Posted 24 January 2014 - 07:06 AM

Here the  mk-of, shot on Ektachrome 100d and Tri-X, with Canon 1014 xls and 514 xl. This really seems super 8.

 


  • 1

#19 David Cunningham

David Cunningham
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1048 posts
  • Cinematographer

Posted 24 January 2014 - 09:15 AM

<sigh>  The loss of E100D is so depressing.  :(


  • 3

#20 ignacio benedeti

ignacio benedeti
  • Basic Members
  • PipPip
  • 54 posts
  • Producer

Posted 24 January 2014 - 04:28 PM

Dear JL: a beautiful film stock for a very pretty girls! Nice telecine and postproduction, too. A pleasure to watch. Congratulations! CINEcerely, Ignacio
  • 0



Broadcast Solutions Inc

FJS International, LLC

Aerial Filmworks

The Slider

Glidecam

Ritter Battery

rebotnix Technologies

Paralinx LLC

Abel Cine

Gamma Ray Digital Inc

Visual Products

Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS

Metropolis Post

CineLab

Rig Wheels Passport

Tai Audio

Technodolly

Willys Widgets

CineTape

Rig Wheels Passport

Technodolly

Paralinx LLC

FJS International, LLC

Willys Widgets

Aerial Filmworks

Gamma Ray Digital Inc

Metropolis Post

rebotnix Technologies

Broadcast Solutions Inc

Ritter Battery

CineLab

CineTape

Tai Audio

Glidecam

Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS

Abel Cine

The Slider

Visual Products