Jump to content


Photo

Calculating Soft Light Throw


  • Please log in to reply
5 replies to this topic

#1 Ronnee Swenton

Ronnee Swenton
  • Basic Members
  • PipPip
  • 15 posts
  • Cinematographer

Posted 27 February 2014 - 11:56 PM

I'm familiar with calculating direct light sources using photo metric data/calculators, but have never encountered a sure fire way of figuring out an exposure for a diffused light. To me it seems like there are too many variables to get it perfect but I'm interested in a ball park or at the very least an "ideal" result.

I wouldn't mind a general answer, but I do have a specific setup I'm interested in calculating for if any one is able to help me.

I'm considering creating a flying moon about 20' vertical (bottom of the 5x5x5 cube). 4 2K Juniors pointed at opposite corners, the entire cube covered in bleached muslin.

I'm trying to figure out what my exposure would be directly below at head height, and what the maximum horizontal distance from the cube I could pull a 1.4. I'm slightly nervous I might need more power, which I imagine will be the case.
  • 0

#2 Mark Kenfield

Mark Kenfield
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1201 posts
  • Cinematographer
  • Australia/Wherever The Wind Takes Me

Posted 28 February 2014 - 02:42 AM

The photometrics would change vastly depending on the fabric being bounced into or shot through, it would change depending on the beam angle at which a particular source hit it at, it would change depending on both the distance of the source from the diffusion as well as the distance of the diffusion from the subject. So I really can't see any real way to calculate precise luminance the setup would provide without testing it specifically.
  • 0

#3 Adrian Sierkowski

Adrian Sierkowski
  • Sustaining Members
  • 7485 posts
  • Cinematographer
  • Los Angeles, Ca

Posted 28 February 2014 - 03:30 AM

Hell it would even change often substantially with how recently it was last put through the wash. If you are going with one of those helium balloons, however, they may already have rough photometrics on it.


  • 0

#4 Ronnee Swenton

Ronnee Swenton
  • Basic Members
  • PipPip
  • 15 posts
  • Cinematographer

Posted 01 March 2014 - 02:22 AM

Well with that's said, has anybody every flew a flying moon and what was your setup and resulting measurements? Perhaps I can get an idea by scaling down from somebody else's measurements.
  • 0

#5 andrew ward

andrew ward
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 269 posts
  • Cinematographer

Posted 01 March 2014 - 04:51 AM

Whys the textile so heavy?
  • 0

#6 andrew ward

andrew ward
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 269 posts
  • Cinematographer

Posted 01 March 2014 - 04:52 AM

And why use fresnels?
  • 0


Willys Widgets

Rig Wheels Passport

rebotnix Technologies

CineTape

New Pro Video - New and Used Equipment

Paralinx LLC

FJS International, LLC

Wooden Camera

Metropolis Post

Glidecam

The Slider

CineLab

Aerial Filmworks

Visual Products

Broadcast Solutions Inc

Gamma Ray Digital Inc

Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS

Abel Cine

Technodolly

Tai Audio

Ritter Battery

CineLab

FJS International, LLC

Willys Widgets

Rig Wheels Passport

Metropolis Post

New Pro Video - New and Used Equipment

Abel Cine

Visual Products

Glidecam

Wooden Camera

Broadcast Solutions Inc

CineTape

Paralinx LLC

rebotnix Technologies

Technodolly

Gamma Ray Digital Inc

Ritter Battery

The Slider

Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS

Aerial Filmworks

Tai Audio