Jump to content


Photo

Letus Anamorphic X Adapter


  • Please log in to reply
10 replies to this topic

#1 Andy_Alderslade

Andy_Alderslade
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1055 posts
  • Cinematographer
  • London, UK

Posted 30 March 2014 - 04:25 PM

Hi everybody, hope you're all well out there.

 

Some of the stuff shot on it looks quite nice:

 

 

 

But wondering how practical it is to shoot with?

 

Has anyone had any experience with it, seen its pros and cons? I don't believe there any here in the UK yet so I'd quite like to get peoples feedback on it.

 

Cheers,

Andy


  • 0

#2 Stuart Hooper

Stuart Hooper

    New

  • Basic Members
  • Pip
  • 1 posts

Posted 30 March 2014 - 08:25 PM

I thought for sure I'd be buying one when it was first announced, but the tests and the manner it's been released and general lack of information has given me great pause.  In fact I came here looking to see if anyone had mentioned it on this forum!!!  Turns out that 'flight patterns' video is one I haven't seen.  How did you find it?  I search twitter, vimeo and several forums, daily.  Looks like one of the better things I've seen with it (I find it difficult to tell on Proximity for some reason), but seems to have a lot of the issues I'd suffer on my LA7200.  Still no silver bullet saying 'buy this over the SLR Magic or diopters on the LA7200' to my eyes, though I am looking for it!!!


  • 0

#3 Freya Black

Freya Black
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 4161 posts
  • Other
  • Went over the edge... Central Europe

Posted 31 March 2014 - 04:53 AM

Yeah I'm curious about it too.

 

I think the problem is that it's a bit too expensive for most people to just take a punt and see what it is like.

 

Freya


  • 0

#4 Mark Dunn

Mark Dunn
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 2426 posts
  • Other
  • London

Posted 31 March 2014 - 05:16 AM

Shameless plug.

You could try the Kowa 8Z currently on ebay which will probably be much more reasonably priced.


  • 0

#5 Sean Cunningham

Sean Cunningham
  • Basic Members
  • PipPip
  • 51 posts
  • Other
  • Austin, Texas

Posted 31 March 2014 - 10:57 AM

If Stuart is anything like me, dual-focus is a deal breaker.  It boils down to this: no matter how pretty a given still might be, not your favorite anamorphic feature, not your least favorite anamorphic feature and none inbetween could have been shot as-shot with a dual focus anamorphic.  


  • 0

#6 Andy_Alderslade

Andy_Alderslade
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1055 posts
  • Cinematographer
  • London, UK

Posted 31 March 2014 - 11:27 AM

If Stuart is anything like me, dual-focus is a deal breaker.  It boils down to this: no matter how pretty a given still might be, not your favorite anamorphic feature, not your least favorite anamorphic feature and none inbetween could have been shot as-shot with a dual focus anamorphic.  

Hi Stuart, I'm not sure I follow what you are saying, your sentence construction is brilliantly complex! ;)


  • 0

#7 Sean Cunningham

Sean Cunningham
  • Basic Members
  • PipPip
  • 51 posts
  • Other
  • Austin, Texas

Posted 31 March 2014 - 02:15 PM

Sorry, I get bored sometimes with conventional syntax and the results aren't always in my favor.


  • 0

#8 Mark Kenfield

Mark Kenfield
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1051 posts
  • Cinematographer
  • Australia/Wherever The Wind Takes Me

Posted 02 April 2014 - 01:17 AM

Andy, I think Sean's post basically boils down to: "dual-focus is a pain in the arse".


  • 0

#9 Andy_Alderslade

Andy_Alderslade
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1055 posts
  • Cinematographer
  • London, UK

Posted 02 April 2014 - 03:34 AM

Andy, I think Sean's post basically boils down to: "dual-focus is a pain in the arse".

Nice translation Mark!


  • 0

#10 Sean Cunningham

Sean Cunningham
  • Basic Members
  • PipPip
  • 51 posts
  • Other
  • Austin, Texas

Posted 02 April 2014 - 10:52 AM

Andy, I think Sean's post basically boils down to: "dual-focus is a pain in the arse".

 

More than that though.  Only a few moments into any film you care to select at any random spot you care to pick will quickly present you with a shot that would be impossible to do with a dual-focus system.  Going dual-focus immediately makes that lens the center of the universe and it informs what you can and cannot do with the camera now.   It also imposes a more restrictive kind of performance on your actors.  My point is, it's not simply an aesthetic decision to be taken lightly.  Most films are more than just the sum of their close-ups and insert shots, aren't they?


Edited by Sean Cunningham, 02 April 2014 - 10:55 AM.

  • 0

#11 Vadim Joy

Vadim Joy
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 209 posts
  • Cinematographer
  • Los Angeles, London

Posted 18 April 2014 - 05:17 AM

I think it's way oversized. 


  • 0


Ritter Battery

Glidecam

Metropolis Post

Paralinx LLC

Broadcast Solutions Inc

FJS International, LLC

Technodolly

Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS

rebotnix Technologies

Aerial Filmworks

Tai Audio

Gamma Ray Digital Inc

Opal

CineLab

Rig Wheels Passport

The Slider

Wooden Camera

Visual Products

CineTape

Willys Widgets

Abel Cine

CineLab

Ritter Battery

Metropolis Post

Aerial Filmworks

Rig Wheels Passport

Broadcast Solutions Inc

Willys Widgets

Visual Products

Tai Audio

Opal

rebotnix Technologies

Glidecam

Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS

Abel Cine

The Slider

CineTape

Paralinx LLC

Technodolly

Gamma Ray Digital Inc

Wooden Camera

FJS International, LLC