Jump to content


Photo

Rivas Splicer vs Guillotine Splicer?

splice tape guillotine rivas industry hollywood standard

  • Please log in to reply
6 replies to this topic

#1 Jon Taala

Jon Taala
  • Basic Members
  • PipPip
  • 11 posts
  • Student
  • Chicago

Posted 05 September 2014 - 12:46 AM

Today In class, my teacher told me that Rivas splicer was hollywood standard. Is this true? I swear I always heard Guillotine splicer was industry standard. Is this just a preference thing? I'm curious

 

Thanks!


  • 0

#2 Chris Millar

Chris Millar
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1642 posts
  • Other

Posted 05 September 2014 - 01:25 AM

If I'm not mistaken Rivas facilitates cement, whereas guillotine is for tape (?). I know tape is used lots in projection, but would have thought cement would be more prevalent in editing because the splice is hidden at the frameline.

 

If so, it really depends on what side of Hollywood you're talking about - unless of course you want to find out how many splices of each kind were made in Hollywood in 2014 full stop.

 

Maybe I've got it wrong...


  • 0

#3 Brian Drysdale

Brian Drysdale
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 5030 posts
  • Cinematographer

Posted 05 September 2014 - 01:40 AM

I could believe that the Rivas splicer was the Hollywood standard since it was invented in 1950 for cutting mag film, so was well established and also manufactured by Moviola who supplied editing machines. They're both tape splicers, with the Rivas using pre perforated tape, while the guillotine punches its own.

 

Although, in the UK every cutting room I've been in had a CIR Guillotine splicer, which has the option of angled sound splices. 

 

EDIT I don't know if there was two versions of the Rivas splicer, I've only seen references to a tape version.


Edited by Brian Drysdale, 05 September 2014 - 01:45 AM.

  • 0

#4 Simon Wyss

Simon Wyss
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1354 posts
  • Other
  • Basel, Switzerland

Posted 05 September 2014 - 01:51 AM

I have learnt to love the Rivas splicers. There are models for straight cuts and models for angled cuts in magnetic film.

 

What I like about the Rivas is that I don’t have any of the slugs sticking to the film like with Dr. Leo Cat(t)ozzo’s invention. Plus I’m faster.


  • 0

#5 Brian Drysdale

Brian Drysdale
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 5030 posts
  • Cinematographer

Posted 05 September 2014 - 03:26 AM

Videos showing differences:

 

 


  • 0

#6 Mark Dunn

Mark Dunn
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 2342 posts
  • Other
  • London

Posted 05 September 2014 - 04:53 AM

Plain tape is inexpensive  (and easier to get, by the look of it).

I haven't used the Rivas but it looks a bit fiddly compared with the CIR. The Rivas predates the CIR so perhaps it just became established before the CIR arrived. Splicers last a long time.


  • 0

#7 Brian Drysdale

Brian Drysdale
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 5030 posts
  • Cinematographer

Posted 05 September 2014 - 05:03 AM

I guess the ultimate test is throwing the splicer against the cutting room wall and surviving. Something I've heard of a few editors doing when they keep on running into sync and other problems.


  • 0



Ritter Battery

The Slider

Abel Cine

Paralinx LLC

Willys Widgets

Broadcast Solutions Inc

rebotnix Technologies

CineTape

Rig Wheels Passport

Gamma Ray Digital Inc

Tai Audio

Visual Products

Aerial Filmworks

Wooden Camera

Metropolis Post

Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS

FJS International, LLC

Technodolly

CineLab

Glidecam

rebotnix Technologies

Ritter Battery

Broadcast Solutions Inc

Wooden Camera

The Slider

Technodolly

FJS International, LLC

Abel Cine

Paralinx LLC

Visual Products

Metropolis Post

Glidecam

Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS

CineLab

Tai Audio

Rig Wheels Passport

Willys Widgets

CineTape

Gamma Ray Digital Inc

Aerial Filmworks