Jump to content


Photo

first try hand processing


  • Please log in to reply
6 replies to this topic

#1 David Dvorchak

David Dvorchak

    New

  • Basic Members
  • Pip
  • 3 posts
  • Other

Posted 25 September 2014 - 10:56 AM

First shot at hand-processing Super 8 film in a darkroom. I develop 35mm Tri-X still film all the the time there, so I thought "why not" and basically just repeated the process with Super 8. Came out better than I was expecting (actually, I was just thrilled to have an image at all). Crappy off-the-wall telecine is not so hot.

 


  • 0

#2 Chris Leutger

Chris Leutger
  • Basic Members
  • PipPip
  • 30 posts
  • Student
  • Seattle

Posted 25 September 2014 - 11:06 AM

Looks great, what'd you use for developer and for how long? I'm assuming you just did "spaghetti" style in a tank?


  • 0

#3 Josh Gladstone

Josh Gladstone
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 323 posts
  • Editor
  • Hollywood

Posted 25 September 2014 - 01:26 PM

Nice! I'm assuming based on the white edges that you processed as a negative and and inverted digitally?


  • 0

#4 David Dvorchak

David Dvorchak

    New

  • Basic Members
  • Pip
  • 3 posts
  • Other

Posted 25 September 2014 - 01:47 PM

Looks great, what'd you use for developer and for how long? I'm assuming you just did "spaghetti" style in a tank?

 

I used Sprint Systems Standard Developer (they supply all our darkroom chemistry) for 10 minutes, agitating for the first minute and then for 5 seconds every 30 seconds after that. Though I seem to be reading that I might not need to develop for that long, I just went with what I normally do. Stop, fix, fixer remover, wash. Yes, I crammed it all in a Paterson 5 reel tank! Processed to negative though I want to learn the reversal process soon.

 

Nice! I'm assuming based on the white edges that you processed as a negative and and inverted digitally?

 

Yes, I want to get it properly telecined (I have another reel from this, too) but was too impatient to wait for that!

 

Thanks!


Edited by David Dvorchak, 25 September 2014 - 01:48 PM.

  • 0

#5 Gregg MacPherson

Gregg MacPherson
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1830 posts
  • Other
  • New Zealand

Posted 25 September 2014 - 10:59 PM

 

..... Yes, I crammed it all in a Paterson 5 reel tank! ...

 

 

I can't remember if Lomo tanks take S8, but if they do you might enjoy that.  But your spagetti style looked good.  I always wanted to try processing 16mm spagetti style in a bathtub,  but never did.


  • 0

#6 Chris Leutger

Chris Leutger
  • Basic Members
  • PipPip
  • 30 posts
  • Student
  • Seattle

Posted 26 September 2014 - 02:19 AM

The Lomo tanks do Super 8, or at least I know someone that says they use one. Also Jobo (Catlabs) announced at Photokina that they have designed a Super 8 tank for the Jobo system. It's still being developed but hopefully soon. I suppose to assist all those Logmar users. Funny, I keep seeing signs that we're a long way from film giving up the ghost....


  • 0

#7 David Dvorchak

David Dvorchak

    New

  • Basic Members
  • Pip
  • 3 posts
  • Other

Posted 26 September 2014 - 07:14 AM

I would like to use a Lomo but don't have $ for one. I am happy with the spaghetti method and will be trying it out in bigger containers, buckets, etc.


  • 0


Abel Cine

Willys Widgets

Rig Wheels Passport

Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS

Glidecam

Tai Audio

FJS International, LLC

Technodolly

Gamma Ray Digital Inc

CineTape

Ritter Battery

Metropolis Post

Paralinx LLC

Visual Products

rebotnix Technologies

Aerial Filmworks

The Slider

Broadcast Solutions Inc

Wooden Camera

CineLab

Metropolis Post

Aerial Filmworks

Rig Wheels Passport

Ritter Battery

Willys Widgets

Abel Cine

rebotnix Technologies

Paralinx LLC

Wooden Camera

The Slider

Visual Products

Broadcast Solutions Inc

Technodolly

CineLab

Glidecam

Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS

Tai Audio

CineTape

Gamma Ray Digital Inc

FJS International, LLC