Jump to content


Photo

Super Takumar vs. stock zoom lens


  • Please log in to reply
2 replies to this topic

#1 Gareth Blackstock

Gareth Blackstock
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 121 posts
  • Student
  • Ararat, Victoria Australia

Posted 07 October 2014 - 07:52 PM

G'day,

 

I recently posted a query about prime lenses, and from the advice went out and bought a Super Takumar 55mm prime.  I attached it to my K-3 and went shooting.  My question is:  with these lenses being quite affordable, and high in quality, should I stock my kit with a 28, 85, and 135mm lens? 

 

I am guessing they offer better quality optics than my Zenit zoom lens, but are they substantially better?  I do not intend to shoot film aimed at attaining the highest quality image for blow up to 35mm.  For short filming purposes, is the Zenit lens more than enough?  Is stocking up on primes over kill?

 

I intend on getting my footage transferred to digital eventually and editing on the computer.  Would the difference between a prime and zoom lens knock me out, or is the difference only noticeable when you spend hundreds on 4K telecine from the best lab?

 

It may be a simple or daft question, but if I were commuting to work would I need a ferrari or a toyota...

 

Cheers, Gareth


  • 0


#2 Stuart Brereton

Stuart Brereton
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 2939 posts
  • Cinematographer
  • Los Angeles

Posted 07 October 2014 - 11:43 PM

A set of good manual primes will be substantially better than your Zenit zoom. Whether or not they are worth the expense is a question only you can answer. Assuming you stay with the Asahi primes you'd be looking at:

 

28mm f3.5. Around $50. not bad, but there are cheaper and faster 28mm lenses available.

35mm f2. Around $150. Soft wide open open, although on a 16mm camera the softness may be mitigated by the smaller frame size

35mm f3.5. Around $80. Lovely little lens. Very sharp, great color.

85mm f1.8 or 1.9. Great lenses but expect to pay around $300 for a Super Takumar, and more for a Super Multi Coated.

135mm f3.5. Usually around $30. Not a bad lens. There is a f2.5 version which is much more expensive, at around $150

 

There are of course many options from other lens manufacturers. The other issue is that these are all quite long lenses on a 16mm camera. You really need to find some lenses in the 9mm-25mm range for short film work


  • 0

#3 Gareth Blackstock

Gareth Blackstock
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 121 posts
  • Student
  • Ararat, Victoria Australia

Posted 09 October 2014 - 03:08 PM

Hello,
Thanks for the reply. I have already shot a roll of doubleX with the 55mm, I guess I will have to wait and see when I get it transferred. I would perhaps buy a 28 or 35mm next since prices are quite low.

Cheers, gareth
  • 0


rebotnix Technologies

Ritter Battery

FJS International, LLC

Rig Wheels Passport

Gamma Ray Digital Inc

Broadcast Solutions Inc

Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS

Technodolly

The Slider

Abel Cine

CineTape

Tai Audio

Visual Products

CineLab

Glidecam

Paralinx LLC

Metropolis Post

Aerial Filmworks

Wooden Camera

Willys Widgets

Ritter Battery

CineLab

CineTape

Abel Cine

Willys Widgets

Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS

Paralinx LLC

Gamma Ray Digital Inc

FJS International, LLC

rebotnix Technologies

Aerial Filmworks

Technodolly

Metropolis Post

Broadcast Solutions Inc

Visual Products

Glidecam

The Slider

Wooden Camera

Rig Wheels Passport

Tai Audio