Another shot fashion with Bealieu 4008 and Vision3 50d, the development Andec (quite dirty) and scanning, Ochoypico.
![]() Vision3 50d shot
Started By Jose luis villar, Nov 15 2014 10:19 AM
29 replies to this topic
#1
Posted 15 November 2014 - 10:19 AM Another shot fashion with Bealieu 4008 and Vision3 50d, the development Andec (quite dirty) and scanning, Ochoypico.
#2
Posted 15 November 2014 - 03:19 PM Looks good. What part of Spain is that?
#3
Posted 15 November 2014 - 04:58 PM Is Las Bardenas reales, a small area of Spain, in Navarre near the Pyrenees, that looks like a desert.
#4
Posted 15 November 2014 - 07:12 PM Very nice!
#5
Posted 16 November 2014 - 12:24 AM Hi !
There is a listing for Lab who develop the Vision3 ? Specially in Canada or US.
Thanks!
#6
Posted 16 November 2014 - 06:42 AM Check the Kodak Lab Directory to find labs near you. (Make sure to check off Color Negative to find labs that process Vision 3)
http://motion.kodak....ctory/index.htm
#7
Posted 16 November 2014 - 11:45 AM Thanks !
#8
Posted 16 November 2014 - 02:06 PM Who did the color correction them or you? Looks sharp, any grain reduction?
#9
Posted 16 November 2014 - 02:14 PM NIAGARA Custom Lab
They are a Canadian lab that can process Super 8 color negative VISION3 film.
#10
Posted 16 November 2014 - 02:24 PM Thanks James !!
#11
Posted 17 November 2014 - 07:12 AM
The transfer gives me Ochoypico is a 10 bits very flat file, after I corrected the post through RGB curves. It has some grain reduction, but less than at other times. If you download the .mov can see some grain.
#12
Posted 17 November 2014 - 08:12 AM Jose Nice DS there one of my fave cars also uses of vision 3 and what super 8 can do in this Age , Have not got into shooting 50d neg film as have found costs work out to high for me , Has any one done home cooking with this film in a lomo tank ? All for keeping cost down and Diy cooking, Never say never but for now have loads of 100d/ B/W to keep me going !
#13
Posted 19 November 2014 - 05:00 AM Really nice and crisp pictures. Just wondering about the final format (16:9 ?) did you crop in post or use anamorphic lenses ?
#14
Posted 19 November 2014 - 02:21 PM Very nice footage! Super-8 has come a long way since I last shot it!
#15
Posted 02 December 2014 - 04:56 PM Hi Jose. What kind of post work are you doing to this film to make the colors pop and add sharpness to the image?
You show examples of some software treatment you are applying. What is this exactly?
#16
Posted 07 January 2015 - 01:50 PM Just curious if you had an answer to how you did that. What program/recipe makes the image that much sharper. No reply, so maybe someone else can chime in to help me out. There are certain things that I like about Super8 that 16mm cannot give me (and vice versa), but the one major drawback at times with Super 8 can be the "seeming" sharpness of the image, and if I could surmount that obstacle sometimes, I'd definitely choose to shoot more of it. Just looking for a little help on that front. At least the knowledge of who to go to, so I can reliably enter a workflow using Super8 and know the results won;t be confined to the blurred version of it...just need to know where to go/what to do.
#17
Posted 07 January 2015 - 08:15 PM It could be Neat Video? Or correction and sharpening in Resolve. Maybe a blend of both.
#18
Posted 07 January 2015 - 09:21 PM
Jose does use Neat on a low and fine setting. He does grading in Premiere pro and uses flat Prores 4444 scan from a proprietary scanner at Ochopico. They do a great job.
#19
Posted 07 January 2015 - 11:36 PM I bet if you got an overkill 2K data scan at Cinelab and did light sharpening with Neat Video you could come close. Far more economical to shoot 16mm at that point if your aiming for sharpness on a small gauge.
#20
Posted 07 January 2015 - 11:57 PM His shooting skill is a big part too. Focus is critical and often soft in S8. If you have critical focus, you can keep most of your sharpness by only having to do a slight clean-up of a film like 50D. Neat Video also has some decent sharpening tools. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |