Jump to content




Photo

65mm B&W Motion Picture Film


  • Please log in to reply
97 replies to this topic

#1 Scott Pickering

Scott Pickering
  • Basic Members
  • PipPip
  • 89 posts
  • Other

Posted 13 January 2015 - 10:40 PM

I have a proposal to do a film shot in both 5 perf 65mm (on Panavision System 65) and select shots and or scenes in IMAX 65mm. Basically using most scenes in 5 perf, and scenes with impact in IMAX. The majority of the film to use standard B&W film, with very select scenes in color for a hyper real effect (real life vs dream sequences, etc).

 

My question is- would Kodak accept a special run of 5222 Double X to be cut into 65mm? And what lab doing a special processing run (obviously changing their tanks to B&W chemistry), would accept doing 65mm B&W film? Im sure an agreement could be setup to handle the chemistry, as long as they can still process 65mm film in general. Would CFI be able to do this?

 

As for making a positive print from the B&W negatives, would using color stock POS film work, or would it still be suggested to stick with B&W again? I'm sure using proper filters would work printing to POS film if color is used. I'd like to retain the look of film (like Nolan does with his features) instead of digitally scanning the neg for editing purposes. How would B&W neg looked printed onto color positive film?

 

Any issues with using B&W neg in IMAX or Super Panavsion 70 cameras?

 

Film is around the 2 hour mark according to the script. Time period of 1990s with a short sequence in the 70s. Want to give the film a different look using B&W film, and frankly- who wouldn't love to see a 70mm B&W film on the big screen in IMAX at least once? 5 perf reduction prints could also be made (again another Nolan idea) from the IMAX scenes, so roadshow theaters could present it in 70mm 5 perf.

 

Love to get this project off the ground before using film is completely taken away from cinematographers.


  • 0




#2 Josh Gladstone

Josh Gladstone
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 309 posts
  • Editor
  • Hollywood

Posted 14 January 2015 - 01:24 AM

Wow. I don't really have anything very helpful to say, but that sounds like quite an audacious project! If I were you, my first calls would be to Fotokem and Kodak directly. Good luck!!!!


  • 0

#3 Bill DiPietra

Bill DiPietra
  • Sustaining Members
  • 2262 posts
  • Cinematographer
  • New York City

Posted 14 January 2015 - 01:41 AM

Wow. I don't really have anything very helpful to say, but that sounds like quite an audacious project! If I were you, my first calls would be to Fotokem and Kodak directly. Good luck!!!!


What Josh said. You're lucky to have this opportunity! Congrats & good luck!
  • 0

#4 Simon Wyss

Simon Wyss
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1143 posts
  • Other
  • Basel, Switzerland

Posted 14 January 2015 - 04:01 AM

Catch the Kodakers, this could be their 2015 prestige project!

 

They have the facilities to cut and perforate. Since you speak of 120 minutes 5-perf., a 4-to-1 ratio demands a square kilometer. Absolutely negotiable

 

Same with positive stock (70 mm)

 

George Eastman took personally care that Oscar B. DePue was furnished with 60mm stock in 1897. DePue toured the globe with a Démény-Gaumont camera.

 

https://books.google...eastman&f=false


  • 1

#5 Dirk DeJonghe

Dirk DeJonghe
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 542 posts
  • Industry Rep
  • Kortrijk,Belgium

Posted 14 January 2015 - 06:40 AM

Printing B&W negative onto color positive is not a good choice. Real B&W is much better. Good luck finding a lab that can handle this. The last 70mm lab in Europe closed a couple months ago.


  • 0

#6 Matthias Greving

Matthias Greving
  • Basic Members
  • PipPip
  • 11 posts
  • Other

Posted 14 January 2015 - 08:57 AM

Orwo would be able to cut a masterroll of UN54 or UN74 to 65mm but you still need someone that perforates

the stock.

 

Arri in Munich, Germany is still capable of processing 65 / 70mm.


  • 0

#7 David Cunningham

David Cunningham
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 974 posts
  • Cinematographer

Posted 14 January 2015 - 09:36 AM

Like many of above... nothing to offer for suggestions... but very excited to follow the progress!  Good luck!


  • 0

#8 Scott Pickering

Scott Pickering
  • Basic Members
  • PipPip
  • 89 posts
  • Other

Posted 14 January 2015 - 10:33 AM

The problem holding this all up is funding. I need to find funding for all this. Film would be shot in around Vancouver BC and an nearby city. I certainly see the excitement here for such a project, so maybe getting someone on board to help fund this project would be exciting. Its been 16 years in the making.


  • 0

#9 David Cunningham

David Cunningham
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 974 posts
  • Cinematographer

Posted 14 January 2015 - 11:11 AM

Tried GoFunMe, KickStarter, etc?


  • 0

#10 Scott Pickering

Scott Pickering
  • Basic Members
  • PipPip
  • 89 posts
  • Other

Posted 14 January 2015 - 05:49 PM

I was considering Kickstarter, but being millions of dollars would need to be involved with very little info on what the story they are giving it for, I'm not sure how successful that would be. It's still an option though.


  • 0

#11 Scott Pickering

Scott Pickering
  • Basic Members
  • PipPip
  • 89 posts
  • Other

Posted 14 January 2015 - 09:28 PM

I decided to post up a Kickstarter thing to get this going. Its currently being reviewed before being posted. If all goes well, it should be live in the next while. I asked for 15 million which is a lofty goal, but we'll see how well this does. I originally put 7 million, but I really don't think it would be feasible at that price with using IMAX and 2 hours long. If anyone wants to pledge me, I'd love that. I gave myself till the end of the year to do this. I really didn't like entering in a personal bank account, as I currently don't have a business account. My question is if the funds came to be 100% and it gets sent to one of my accounts, how would Canada Revenue look at that? I wonder if I could switch it to a business account before the thing ends, if I knew it was going to happen? But at 15 million, its a long shot, but I'm hopeful.


  • 0

#12 cole t parzenn

cole t parzenn
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 287 posts
  • Other

Posted 15 January 2015 - 12:31 AM

I suspect it's an oversight but Fuji's MP FAQ states that they make MP black and white camera film.


  • 0

#13 Kenny N Suleimanagich

Kenny N Suleimanagich
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 843 posts
  • Cinematographer
  • New York

Posted 15 January 2015 - 12:48 AM

With Kickstarter you should take into account that you need to give them a percentage of your raised funds. I recommend finding a producer and approaching financial backers for a project of this scope and budget. Also look into grants, and tax incentives. 


  • 0

#14 Scott Pickering

Scott Pickering
  • Basic Members
  • PipPip
  • 89 posts
  • Other

Posted 15 January 2015 - 05:55 PM

I think Kickstarter might not be the way I want to go on this. The income I'd receive would go into a personal account and not a business account, which means I'd have to pay taxes on that. And with that amount of cash, I'd get taxed so high that there wouldn't be much of the funds left for the project. So really a production company supporting this sounds like the better option.


  • 0

#15 Robert Houllahan

Robert Houllahan
  • Sustaining Members
  • 1511 posts
  • Industry Rep
  • Providence R.I.

Posted 15 January 2015 - 07:24 PM

Did you talk to FotoKem about processing B&W? There are not too many film processors with 65mm/70mm rollers in the world I would start by finding out about how the lab would approach it.


  • 0

#16 Mark Dunn

Mark Dunn
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 2182 posts
  • Other
  • London

Posted 16 January 2015 - 08:14 AM

I suspect it's an oversight but Fuji's MP FAQ states that they make MP black and white camera film.

It's an intermediate film for making separations. The effective ISO is very low, probably single figures. Some people are using 16mm intermediate film in cameras, though.


  • 0

#17 Scott Pickering

Scott Pickering
  • Basic Members
  • PipPip
  • 89 posts
  • Other

Posted 16 January 2015 - 10:31 PM

I contacted Fotokem and asked them if they could do it. Also Kickstarter wants for more information to post my project, so I decided not to follow through with them at this time.


  • 0

#18 Josh Gladstone

Josh Gladstone
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 309 posts
  • Editor
  • Hollywood

Posted 17 January 2015 - 01:26 AM

What did Fotokem say?


  • 0

#19 Scott Pickering

Scott Pickering
  • Basic Members
  • PipPip
  • 89 posts
  • Other

Posted 17 January 2015 - 04:07 PM

They will contact me on Monday, as they are not available during weekends.


  • 0

#20 Scott Pickering

Scott Pickering
  • Basic Members
  • PipPip
  • 89 posts
  • Other

Posted 17 January 2015 - 05:51 PM

I got a short email back from Andrew at Fotokem. He states they do have in their possession a decommissioned B&W 65mm processor that was used at IMAGICA up until 2004. Fotokem has never made it operational and said it would take some effort to do so. He said he'll get back to me on Monday to see if it is viable, with the amount of film my movie would use.


  • 0


CineLab

Paralinx LLC

Technodolly

Tai Audio

The Slider

Ritter Battery

CineTape

Aerial Filmworks

Willys Widgets

Broadcast Solutions Inc

Visual Products

Pro 8mm

rebotnix Technologies

Abel Cine

Glidecam

Rig Wheels Passport

Zylight

Aerial Filmworks

Paralinx LLC

Rig Wheels Passport

Broadcast Solutions Inc

Technodolly

CineLab

CineTape

Willys Widgets

Ritter Battery

Zylight

Visual Products

Tai Audio

Abel Cine

Glidecam

rebotnix Technologies

Pro 8mm

The Slider