Preping for Varicam shoot, shalow d.o.f concern
Posted 16 May 2005 - 11:01 PM
1) The producer like to have the shallowest depth of field possible, fish eye lenses is also considered.
2) Output to 35mm film, Cine Alta or Varicam is more suitable for this?
So far I'm looking into the 2/3" Zeiss & Fujinon E-series 20mm and 40mm. Are they comparable to 35mm in terms of shallow d.o.f? I'm thinking of renting a P&S Technik Pro 35mm adaptor for 2/3" to get that extra shallow d.o.f, is this necessasry since they already have 2/3" prime lenses? How about fish eye 2/3" lens?
Any comments on actual film output fr. Varicam vs. Cine Alta?
Posted 16 May 2005 - 11:16 PM
There is about two and half stops more depth of field with 2/3" CCD HD cameras over 35mm. This means that if you shoot at an f/2.0 in HD, you'd get the equivalent of shooting at an f/4.0-5.6 split.
Not shallow focus except for longer-lensed, tighter shots. I think that's fine, personally, in half the cases anyway except wide-angle shots (where a shallow-focus look is always hard to get anyway).
A super-fast HD prime lens opened to f/1.6 will help even more, but for a super-shallow-focus look, you'd have to use the P&S Technik Pro35 and fast 35mm cine lenses.
Fish-eye and shallow focus are contradictory almost.
Posted 17 May 2005 - 03:41 AM
I can't really add much to Mr. Mullen's comments - I recently shot with Varicam, and... really, it's just another video camera that happens to have the useful ability to shoot at 60fps. Very easy to use. I am used to 2/3" video and I don't have a problem with the depth of field; obvious focus artifacts are if I want them to be there, but if I have a particularly evil focus pull to do and I don't want it, I can get rid of it! Ideal.
Posted 17 May 2005 - 04:08 AM