Jump to content


Photo

Standard 16mm aspect ratio obsolete?


  • Please log in to reply
6 replies to this topic

#1 Jon R Williams

Jon R Williams

    New

  • Basic Members
  • Pip
  • 2 posts
  • Cinematographer
  • Ogden, .UT

Posted 16 June 2015 - 11:37 PM

I would like to hear your comments as to whether the Standard 16mm film aspect ratio retains any potential value for documentary production.
  • 0

#2 Satsuki Murashige

Satsuki Murashige
  • Sustaining Members
  • 3510 posts
  • Cinematographer
  • San Francisco, CA

Posted 17 June 2015 - 02:04 PM

I think the 1.33:1 aspect ratio is more or less obsolete for general production. There are very few theaters that can properly show 1.33:1 without pillar boxing a wider format (mostly old revival theaters still projecting film), and there are no new 1.33:1 TV monitors being sold. If you were making deliverables for broadcast, theatrical, and Netflix you would be required to give them at least a 1.78:1 version or some other current standard. That said you can still use the aspect ratio for aesthetic purposes. It will just be displayed within a wider frame.

The only similar current aspect ratio is 15-perf 65mm IMAX, 1.43:1. But even then you would have to deliver a 1.78 version for other distribution venues.
  • 0

#3 Simon Wyss

Simon Wyss
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1570 posts
  • Other
  • Near Basel, Switzerland

Posted 18 June 2015 - 01:35 AM

To not be able to project regular 16 is proof of ignorance, worse: disrespect of film history. It should be the other way around, that regular 16 (and 35) is the base plus other aspect ratios in addition. Integration, not exclusion!

 

Different story with television and video, of course


  • 1

#4 Brian Drysdale

Brian Drysdale
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 5302 posts
  • Cinematographer

Posted 18 June 2015 - 02:06 AM

Very few commerical theatres could project regular 16, apart from art houses. It was mostly used by film clubs and A/V work.

 

The last time I used my 16mm projector was about 10 years ago to project a short film which was only available as a print. The picture quality was on a higher level to the DVD video projected shorts, the down side being the projector noise.


  • 0

#5 Simon Wyss

Simon Wyss
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1570 posts
  • Other
  • Near Basel, Switzerland

Posted 18 June 2015 - 03:23 AM

You could use a Diksi-Tfp (Tonfilmprojektor). Purrs like a kitten

 

http://www.filmvorfu...&attach_id=4710

Attached Images

  • Diksi-Tfp., Werkstatt.jpg

  • 0

#6 David Cunningham

David Cunningham
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1054 posts
  • Cinematographer

Posted 18 June 2015 - 06:35 PM

I love my regular 16mm pageant projector and all my work prints and what's left of my e100d. Nothing compared to those amazing images! My super16 pageant is that much more awesome. Projecting super16 e100d is like watching heaven. Just beautiful. Even timed super16 v3 50d 7203 is pretty awesome.
  • 0

#7 Simon Wyss

Simon Wyss
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1570 posts
  • Other
  • Near Basel, Switzerland

Posted 19 June 2015 - 12:37 AM

Link upstairs is not valid. Next try:

 

Diksi-Tfp., 2013.JPG


  • 0


Technodolly

Visual Products

Aerial Filmworks

Gamma Ray Digital Inc

New Pro Video - New and Used Equipment

Metropolis Post

Willys Widgets

CineTape

CineLab

Rig Wheels Passport

Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS

Tai Audio

FJS International, LLC

Ritter Battery

Abel Cine

The Slider

Broadcast Solutions Inc

Wooden Camera

Glidecam

rebotnix Technologies

Paralinx LLC

The Slider

Wooden Camera

Glidecam

rebotnix Technologies

Rig Wheels Passport

CineLab

FJS International, LLC

Paralinx LLC

Gamma Ray Digital Inc

Abel Cine

Broadcast Solutions Inc

Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS

Tai Audio

Visual Products

CineTape

Willys Widgets

New Pro Video - New and Used Equipment

Metropolis Post

Ritter Battery

Aerial Filmworks

Technodolly