Jump to content


Photo

Cinematographers Choice?


  • Please log in to reply
7 replies to this topic

#1 Guy Meachin

Guy Meachin
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 216 posts
  • Other
  • U.K.

Posted 19 May 2005 - 06:37 PM

I often wonder how a cinematographer chooses what shots s/he can afford to use given a certain budget. How do you plan which scenes are most important and which need to have more finance thrown at them for camera dynamics etc (if they decided that's what they wanted).

How do they go through each scene and work out whether they can do what they want with the money they have? Surely this must be a nightmare! Does a cinematographer sit down with the producer?

I'm intrigued!
  • 0

#2 David Mullen ASC

David Mullen ASC
  • Sustaining Members
  • 19769 posts
  • Cinematographer
  • Los Angeles

Posted 19 May 2005 - 06:47 PM

Experience teaches you how long certain types of shots take to set-up and how many crew people are needed to do it efficiently, and what special equipment is needed. More experience you have, the better your estimates, although if you are working with unfamiliar crew or equipment, you may be thrown off your estimates.

But it does require sitting down with the director and finding out about the type of elaborate shots he has in mind for a scene so it can be properly scheduled and budgeted. If on the day, the director decides he needs to do a shot that requires a Weaver-Steadman head and you aren't carrying one, then you can tell him that a little warning would have been nice...

If you are doing things like remote crane or Steadicam shots, you also have to consider rigging and derigging time and whether it would be more efficient to pick-up a second camera for that stuff so you can shoot while they are rigging.
  • 0

#3 Guy Meachin

Guy Meachin
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 216 posts
  • Other
  • U.K.

Posted 20 May 2005 - 08:10 AM

Thanks!

I'm still waiting until I have an evening free to sit down and watch Northfork! Looks brilliant!


Guy
  • 0

#4 Phil Rhodes

Phil Rhodes
  • Sustaining Members
  • 11945 posts
  • Other

Posted 20 May 2005 - 09:21 AM

Hi,

...so what's a Weaver-Steadman head?

Phil
  • 0

#5 Wendell_Greene

Wendell_Greene
  • Sustaining Members
  • 545 posts
  • Other

Posted 20 May 2005 - 10:31 AM

weaver-stedman
  • 0

#6 Phil Rhodes

Phil Rhodes
  • Sustaining Members
  • 11945 posts
  • Other

Posted 20 May 2005 - 01:44 PM

Oh, fine, it's just a remote head...
  • 0

#7 David Mullen ASC

David Mullen ASC
  • Sustaining Members
  • 19769 posts
  • Cinematographer
  • Los Angeles

Posted 20 May 2005 - 05:53 PM

Oh, fine, it's just a remote head...

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>


Actually, the typical Weaver-Steadman head used is a manual 3-axis tripod head that allows you to undersling the camera for ground level dolly moves, etc.
  • 0

#8 oscar jimenez

oscar jimenez
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 317 posts
  • Cinematographer
  • PANAMA, REPUBLIC OF PANAMA

Posted 21 May 2005 - 09:01 AM

Actually it is not "just a remote Head" if you use it, you'll surely going to change that definition, mostly if used on a Porta Jib, It is a beauty.
  • 0


Metropolis Post

Visual Products

Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS

Paralinx LLC

Glidecam

CineLab

CineTape

Tai Audio

Wooden Camera

Opal

Abel Cine

Gamma Ray Digital Inc

rebotnix Technologies

Technodolly

Ritter Battery

Rig Wheels Passport

Broadcast Solutions Inc

FJS International, LLC

The Slider

Aerial Filmworks

Willys Widgets

Opal

FJS International, LLC

Abel Cine

Wooden Camera

Metropolis Post

Broadcast Solutions Inc

Technodolly

Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS

Glidecam

Gamma Ray Digital Inc

Paralinx LLC

rebotnix Technologies

CineLab

Aerial Filmworks

Willys Widgets

Ritter Battery

Rig Wheels Passport

The Slider

Visual Products

CineTape

Tai Audio