Jump to content




Photo

Telecine noise or Grain?

16mm celuloid grain noise spirit telecine

  • Please log in to reply
5 replies to this topic

#1 Yunus Koylu

Yunus Koylu

    New

  • Basic Members
  • Pip
  • 2 posts
  • Student
  • Hamburg

Posted 03 October 2015 - 04:28 PM

Hey everyone,

 

Recently I shot a student film with 16mm Kodak 200t 7213 stock. It recently came back from telecine and it looks much more grainy than the footage I've seen previously online of 7213 or even 7219. A Spirit Data cine was used for the transfer and I got the footage as HD pro res 4:2:2. We rated the film at 200 and underexposed -1 stop. My question is, is this the noise from the telecine or is it just 16mm grain? I attached some screenshots below. 

 

Thanks in advance

 

Best Regards

 

Yunus

 

 

4.jpg

 

 

 

 

Sequence%2001.Still001.jpg


  • 0




#2 Adrian Sierkowski

Adrian Sierkowski
  • Sustaining Members
  • 6771 posts
  • Cinematographer
  • Los Angeles, Ca

Posted 03 October 2015 - 05:28 PM

Probably both as you not only under-exposed the film, but then the TC op pulled it back up. Also it's all so flatly lit that any change in contrast (e.g. grain and noise) immediately pops out at you.

YIn motion could be more helpful to see.


  • 0

#3 David Cunningham

David Cunningham
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 978 posts
  • Cinematographer

Posted 03 October 2015 - 09:52 PM

Also, an HD scan would likely enhance the grain as well. The relatively low resolution scan would cause grain aliasing that makes the grain chunkier and larger than it really is.

In 16mm, 7213 is pretty grainy.

I've also found that most transfers of tungsten balanced stocks are far more noisy likely due to the extra sensitive blue layer.
  • 0

#4 Tyler Purcell

Tyler Purcell
  • Sustaining Members
  • 2369 posts
  • Other
  • Los Angeles

Posted 04 October 2015 - 02:38 AM

For sure what Adrian said. It's very typical for telecine operators to do a "one light" transfer, where they set a look and run it off. So there was some correction made right off the top to make it look acceptable. In the future you can ask the operator to give you a "RAW" color space file and they should be able to do that.

David's point is also spot on. HD telecine's can look like crap sometimes, especially with tungsten stocks.
  • 0

#5 Yunus Koylu

Yunus Koylu

    New

  • Basic Members
  • Pip
  • 2 posts
  • Student
  • Hamburg

Posted 04 October 2015 - 07:55 AM

Thanks for the quick replies .So it would make sense if I got a 2K or HD scan, right? 


  • 0

#6 David Cunningham

David Cunningham
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 978 posts
  • Cinematographer

Posted 04 October 2015 - 10:11 AM

2k and HD are basically the same in wide format like super16. There's virtually no difference. A good 4K scan on something like the Director at MetroPost, Scanity at Cinelicious, Xena at Cinelab or even ScanStation at Gamma Ray Digital may tighten up the grain a bit. But, I'm guessing for the most part it's the under exposure of a tungsten stock and then correction in post pushing that grain more than anything else.
  • 0



Pro 8mm

rebotnix Technologies

Tai Audio

Abel Cine

Ritter Battery

Rig Wheels Passport

Willys Widgets

Technodolly

CineTape

CineLab

Zylight

Paralinx LLC

Visual Products

Glidecam

Aerial Filmworks

Broadcast Solutions Inc

The Slider

CineLab

Paralinx LLC

Abel Cine

Zylight

Ritter Battery

Visual Products

Willys Widgets

CineTape

The Slider

Tai Audio

Technodolly

Pro 8mm

Rig Wheels Passport

rebotnix Technologies

Glidecam

Broadcast Solutions Inc

Aerial Filmworks