Found this video on Vimeo and I am really impressed by the footage, the grading, and the area.
![]() Incredible color!
Started By Ted Keaton III, Dec 14 2015 08:05 PM
8 replies to this topic
#1
Posted 14 December 2015 - 08:05 PM Found this video on Vimeo and I am really impressed by the footage, the grading, and the area.
#2
Posted 16 December 2015 - 02:02 PM On a Sony A7ii? Looks damn good. Color is very stylized but works for the location.
#3
Posted 16 December 2015 - 03:56 PM That's the look of the moment, certainly. I call it "advertising executive who doesn't understand how log works."
#4
Posted 16 December 2015 - 04:11 PM ^HA!
#5
Posted 16 December 2015 - 04:22 PM
Am I the only one here who doesn't find it "incredible?" It's nice, but I think the location is really what's pulling you in. As Phil often says, the production design is half of what makes quality cinematography.
#6
Posted 17 December 2015 - 12:08 AM
I'm with Bill on this one, I didn't see anything incredible. It had lifted mid's with a color tint. That trick is so over-used to compensate for poor shooting, it kinda gets boring honestly. Cool locations and all, but meh. I like video's to tell stories, travel logs aren't that interesting.
#7
Posted 17 December 2015 - 06:35 AM Flat as a pancake on my monitor. TRIPOD!
#8
Posted 19 December 2015 - 07:01 AM Looks awful , Cuba is a very colourful place this makes it look flat and drab !
#9
Posted 02 January 2016 - 05:50 PM 5-6 years ago, youtube was full of "shallow depth of field" footage because, every amateur that, until then was shooting on 2/3 sensor, had the opportunity to use a 35mm camera (aka 5D), and what can be cooler than shooting f/1,2 to get "cinematic look" ? Now, all those guys are using LOG profile (and slowmo) because every crap video looks "cinematic" and everyone likes it. So will be the "miracle" luts, the grain simulators, and other *@(#. None of this tons of footage worth to get attention. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |