Jump to content




Photo

The Eastsider (a feature shot on B&W s16mm)

s16mm 16mm feature celluloid black & white arri sr3

  • Please log in to reply
15 replies to this topic

#1 Nicholas Grillo

Nicholas Grillo
  • Basic Members
  • PipPip
  • 11 posts
  • Director
  • Warren, MI

Posted 15 December 2015 - 08:04 PM

Just completed post on my first feature, "The Eastsider" (www.theeastsidermovie.com), a comedy/drama set in suburban Detroit. Shot it on Kodak 7222 with the Arri SR3, an amazing camera. Nothing will ever beat the look of celluloid.

Here is the trailer (contains coarse language):

 

 

I'm putting this thread in the "in production" section, since I don't even have a festival premiere date yet (not sure if this thread belongs elsewhere).


  • 1




#2 David Mullen ASC

David Mullen ASC
  • Sustaining Members
  • 18789 posts
  • Cinematographer
  • Los Angeles

Posted 15 December 2015 - 08:24 PM

Looks good, the 16mm Double-X reminds me of Jarmusch's "Stranger Than Paradise"... certainly stands out against all the digital indie stuff.


  • 1

#3 Hunter O'Shea

Hunter O'Shea
  • Basic Members
  • PipPip
  • 55 posts
  • Cinematographer
  • Phoenix, Arizona

Posted 15 December 2015 - 08:34 PM

This looks great. Personally I'd be very interested in watching this film and the contrast on the b&w stock looks amazing!

 

- Hunter


  • 1

#4 Nicholas Grillo

Nicholas Grillo
  • Basic Members
  • PipPip
  • 11 posts
  • Director
  • Warren, MI

Posted 15 December 2015 - 08:36 PM

Looks good, the 16mm Double-X reminds me of Jarmusch's "Stranger Than Paradise"... certainly stands out against all the digital indie stuff.

 

It's interesting that you compared it to "Stranger Than Paradise." It was one of my biggest influences (I even used the STP soundtrack in the rough cut; it gave my composer an idea of what I wanted; only the first track in the trailer is used in the actual film).


  • 0

#5 Nicholas Grillo

Nicholas Grillo
  • Basic Members
  • PipPip
  • 11 posts
  • Director
  • Warren, MI

Posted 15 December 2015 - 08:40 PM

This looks great. Personally I'd be very interested in watching this film and the contrast on the b&w stock looks amazing!

 

- Hunter

 

Thank you!

 

I really doubt I'll ever go back to digital (which I used for my shorts). Celluloid is too beautiful (and, in the end, it's not as expensive as a lot of people think).


  • 0

#6 Wiliam Cardoza

Wiliam Cardoza
  • Basic Members
  • PipPip
  • 44 posts
  • Other
  • Salinas, California

Posted 21 December 2015 - 09:08 PM

Scenes with the black beanie dude seems reminiscent of "Clerks" LOL

 

Just curious, did you ever consider using Tri-X reversal?

 

Congratulations on completing your film.


  • 0

#7 Nicholas Grillo

Nicholas Grillo
  • Basic Members
  • PipPip
  • 11 posts
  • Director
  • Warren, MI

Posted 21 December 2015 - 09:14 PM

Scenes with the black beanie dude seems reminiscent of "Clerks" LOL

 

Just curious, did you ever consider using Tri-X reversal?

 

Congratulations on completing your film.

 

Thank you! I preferred the 7222 over the reversal for its high-contrast and graininess. I love the extra grit it gave the film.


  • 0

#8 Jay Young

Jay Young
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 380 posts
  • Cinematographer
  • Lexington KY

Posted 22 December 2015 - 06:37 AM

Youtube just simply does not play well with celluloid.  Digital artifacts all over the place. 

 

Looks great!


  • 1

#9 Chris Burke

Chris Burke
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1517 posts
  • Boston, MA

Posted 06 January 2016 - 01:02 PM

With high end scanning now becoming very affordable, I feel 7222 looks better than ever. I couldn't agree more about Youtube. That's why there is Vimeo, film looks much better on their site. Don't know why. S16 is a very affordable format.
  • 1

#10 Chris Burke

Chris Burke
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1517 posts
  • Boston, MA

Posted 06 January 2016 - 01:07 PM

Honestly, we see lots of trailers and teasers on this site, very few engage me. When I watched your film , I had a huge smile the whole time. I would definitely pay to see this. Best of luck with it.
  • 1

#11 Nicholas Grillo

Nicholas Grillo
  • Basic Members
  • PipPip
  • 11 posts
  • Director
  • Warren, MI

Posted 06 January 2016 - 04:06 PM

Yeah, the Vimeo upload is quite a bit better (no random digital noise). Makes me wonder if I should've used different settings for YT? Not sure.

 

 

Thank you very much for the compliments! Hoping for a festival premiere by the summer.


Edited by Nicholas Grillo, 06 January 2016 - 04:07 PM.

  • 0

#12 Manu Delpech

Manu Delpech
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 289 posts
  • Director

Posted 07 January 2016 - 05:28 AM

Looks good ! But my god, the Vimeo compression is an abomination, it really struggles with 16 mm, it's okay watching in a tiny window, but once you blow it up to full screen, it's just unwatchable. Take a look around but I think there are some recommended settings you can use to make it better, but then again, YT and Vimeo, same fight, compression just has a tough time with grain, either it completely vanishes on YT or it turns into blocky patches on Vimeo. It also has to do with the B&W, B&W is so much grainier to my eyes and plays even less nicely with compression.


Edited by Manu Delpech, 07 January 2016 - 05:29 AM.

  • 1

#13 Richard Boddington

Richard Boddington
  • Sustaining Members
  • 5195 posts
  • Director

Posted 07 January 2016 - 12:25 PM

Wow another writer, director, editor, and producer, and here I thought I was the only one. :)

 

R,


  • 1

#14 Saul Pincus

Saul Pincus
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 113 posts
  • Director

Posted 07 January 2016 - 01:23 PM

Wow another writer, director, editor, and producer, and here I thought I was the only one. :)

 

R,

 

Hardly... :)

 


  • 0

#15 Richard Boddington

Richard Boddington
  • Sustaining Members
  • 5195 posts
  • Director

Posted 07 January 2016 - 01:42 PM

Looks like some very nice solid production values Saul, you're in Ontario?

 

R,


  • 0

#16 Saul Pincus

Saul Pincus
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 113 posts
  • Director

Posted 07 January 2016 - 06:25 PM

Thanks Richard. Yes, I'm in Toronto.


  • 0



Aerial Filmworks

Rig Wheels Passport

Abel Cine

Broadcast Solutions Inc

The Slider

CineTape

Paralinx LLC

Glidecam

rebotnix Technologies

Visual Products

Technodolly

Zylight

Ritter Battery

Pro 8mm

Tai Audio

Willys Widgets

CineLab

Broadcast Solutions Inc

Zylight

Pro 8mm

Willys Widgets

Rig Wheels Passport

CineLab

rebotnix Technologies

Tai Audio

Aerial Filmworks

CineTape

Abel Cine

The Slider

Paralinx LLC

Visual Products

Ritter Battery

Technodolly

Glidecam