Jump to content




Photo

Low Contrast Filters


  • Please log in to reply
5 replies to this topic

#1 Micah Van Hove

Micah Van Hove

    New

  • Basic Members
  • Pip
  • 7 posts
  • Director
  • California

Posted 15 December 2015 - 08:49 PM

When would you recommend using LC filters?

 

I'm gearing up for a short film in January and the main reference the directors have given me is "Five Easy Pieces." It appears that that film could've been shot with LC filters, but I'm not sure. I'm hoping to use LC as a creative choice rather than technical — how powerful is the effect of an LC filter, and what grade of LC would you recommend (1/4, 1, 2,3,4 etc)? This film is a lot of EXT. DAY.


  • 0




#2 David Mullen ASC

David Mullen ASC
  • Sustaining Members
  • 18788 posts
  • Cinematographer
  • Los Angeles

Posted 15 December 2015 - 09:24 PM

Most of "Barry Lyndon" was shot with a Tiffen Low-Con #3:

 

barrylyndon10.jpg

 

barrylyndon11.jpg

 

barrylyndon12.jpg

 

When you get a bright area in the frame, you will notice a bit of halation, though not as prominent as from a Fog filter or a ProMist filter.

 

I think the Schneider Low-Cons may be a bit more like Tiffen's UltraCons, which lower contrast, lift blacks and shadows, but with less halation.

 

Low-Cons were popular in the 1970's, along with Fog filters.  The past sequences in "Godfather Part II" were shot with Low-Cons.  "Bound for Glory" used a mix of Low-Cons and Fogs.  Harrison's Double-Fogs were a combination of Low-Cons and Fogs.  A lot of "E.T." was shot with a very light Double-Fog.

 

Tiffen's UltraCons and things like Schneider's DigiCons came along after the 1970's.

 

Peter Hyams also used Low-Cons a lot, along with smoke, in movies like "2010".

 

The older filter technology of Low-Cons means that they soften focus slightly and the halation adds a bit of grain-like texture -- some people like this when combined with digital cameras, just as some people like Black ProMists for a similar effect.

 

In terms of black level, that's something you can control with digital color-correction.  Truth is that if you just want a more pastel and lowered-contrast look, that's fairly easy if working with a log or raw original, so I would only use Low-Cons if you want that bit of retro optical halation and softening.  These days, something like a #1/4 would be fine but there is no reason not to test.


  • 0

#3 cole t parzenn

cole t parzenn
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 287 posts
  • Other

Posted 15 December 2015 - 10:08 PM

Wasn't "Barry Lyndon" also push processed?


  • 0

#4 Micah Van Hove

Micah Van Hove

    New

  • Basic Members
  • Pip
  • 7 posts
  • Director
  • California

Posted 15 December 2015 - 10:13 PM

Thanks for the response, David. I assumed also that it could be done in post but I think I'd rather force the choice in-camera. I like the halation effect. Offhand, do you know the light loss of a LC filter or does that vary by intensity?


  • 0

#5 David Mullen ASC

David Mullen ASC
  • Sustaining Members
  • 18788 posts
  • Cinematographer
  • Los Angeles

Posted 15 December 2015 - 10:28 PM

There's no light loss with a Low-Con filter.

Yes, "Barry Lyndon" was pushed one-stop.
  • 1

#6 Micah Van Hove

Micah Van Hove

    New

  • Basic Members
  • Pip
  • 7 posts
  • Director
  • California

Posted 16 December 2015 - 02:25 AM

Extremely helpful, thank you.


  • 0


Willys Widgets

Abel Cine

Broadcast Solutions Inc

Ritter Battery

Zylight

Aerial Filmworks

Paralinx LLC

Tai Audio

Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS

Glidecam

The Slider

Pro 8mm

CineTape

Technodolly

Visual Products

CineLab

rebotnix Technologies

Rig Wheels Passport

Tai Audio

CineTape

Glidecam

Visual Products

Broadcast Solutions Inc

Paralinx LLC

The Slider

Technodolly

rebotnix Technologies

Zylight

Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS

Abel Cine

Aerial Filmworks

Willys Widgets

Ritter Battery

Rig Wheels Passport

CineLab

Pro 8mm