Jump to content


Photo

Tungsten Head vs Kino w/ Tungsten tubes


  • Please log in to reply
4 replies to this topic

#1 Tyler Clark

Tyler Clark
  • Basic Members
  • PipPip
  • 78 posts
  • Cinematographer
  • Ohio

Posted 08 January 2016 - 02:48 PM

Shooting a short narrative in an old antique shop.

 

I was set to have to deal with 4400k light. The lights seem to read closer to 3200 however. 

 

Would 3200k Kino tubes be a better choice to match color to overheads or would a tungsten head? 

 

Also What are your general thoughts on use of 3200k kino tubes? I dont use them often. Ive always felt they rolled a little too pink to match with normal house incandescents when I did. 

 

 


  • 0

#2 Satsuki Murashige

Satsuki Murashige
  • Sustaining Members
  • 3510 posts
  • Cinematographer
  • San Francisco, CA

Posted 08 January 2016 - 04:33 PM

Would you just be replacing the tubes in the existing fixtures with Kino or Optima 32K tubes? I guess you have to figure out how many you would need and if they would even fit or work with the existing ballast. If you can, why not test one or two tubes first to make sure it will work? You may get some flicker with those old ballasts even with new tubes.

I've seen 32K Kino tubes that vary from green to quite magenta, visible to the naked eye. I believe it has to do with the age of the tube. You can always make bunch of a Plus Green and Minus Green gel sleeves I guess. There are also 29K tubes that are a bit warmer and some people say they match better real tungsten units if you're using both in the same frame. The 32K tubes have been good enough for me, but opinions vary.
  • 0

#3 David Mullen ASC

David Mullen ASC
  • Sustaining Members
  • 19646 posts
  • Cinematographer
  • Los Angeles

Posted 08 January 2016 - 05:21 PM

It also depends on how precisely you need to match the color.  If the faces, for example, are always being keyed by the Kino 32 tubes, then it doesn't matter so much if practicals in the background are slightly warmer (which they often are.)  Or you could warm up the Kino 32 tube with some gel.  And if everything is keyed by the Kino 32, then any slight green (usually from the fixture not getting enough air around the tubes) could be timed out.

 

It gets trickier if you try intercutting faces lit by the Kinos with faces lit by the practical sources, if that's the case, it would be better to use tungsten lamps, perhaps on a dimmer, to match the tungsten practicals.

 

My main point is just to find a consistent approach, i.e. faces always keyed by the Kino, or always keyed by tungsten -- makes life easier in the final color-correction.  Backlights and fill matters less in terms of switching between Kinos and tungsten.


  • 0

#4 Tyler Clark

Tyler Clark
  • Basic Members
  • PipPip
  • 78 posts
  • Cinematographer
  • Ohio

Posted 09 January 2016 - 01:20 AM

Would you just be replacing the tubes in the existing fixtures with Kino or Optima 32K tubes? I guess you have to figure out how many you would need and if they would even fit or work with the existing ballast. If you can, why not test one or two tubes first to make sure it will work? You may get some flicker with those old ballasts even with new tubes.

I've seen 32K Kino tubes that vary from green to quite magenta, visible to the naked eye. I believe it has to do with the age of the tube. You can always make bunch of a Plus Green and Minus Green gel sleeves I guess. There are also 29K tubes that are a bit warmer and some people say they match better real tungsten units if you're using both in the same frame. The 32K tubes have been good enough for me, but opinions vary.

 

 

It also depends on how precisely you need to match the color.  If the faces, for example, are always being keyed by the Kino 32 tubes, then it doesn't matter so much if practicals in the background are slightly warmer (which they often are.)  Or you could warm up the Kino 32 tube with some gel.  And if everything is keyed by the Kino 32, then any slight green (usually from the fixture not getting enough air around the tubes) could be timed out.

 

It gets trickier if you try intercutting faces lit by the Kinos with faces lit by the practical sources, if that's the case, it would be better to use tungsten lamps, perhaps on a dimmer, to match the tungsten practicals.

 

My main point is just to find a consistent approach, i.e. faces always keyed by the Kino, or always keyed by tungsten -- makes life easier in the final color-correction.  Backlights and fill matters less in terms of switching between Kinos and tungsten.

 

Thanks so much guys! Always appreciated!


  • 0

#5 Phil Rhodes

Phil Rhodes
  • Sustaining Members
  • 11883 posts
  • Other

Posted 09 January 2016 - 06:10 AM

The low-risk approach is to ensure you're lighting everything with the same sources, or to ensure there's a clearly screen-visible reason why things don't match. Consistency and matching is the number-one problem of filmmaking at anything but the very highest levels, in my experience. Claims that HMI matches daylight or, as discussed here, tungsten kinos match real tungsten are almost always dubious in terms of both colour and character. If you want it to match, shine the same lights at people.

 

P


  • 0


The Slider

Paralinx LLC

Broadcast Solutions Inc

Glidecam

Wooden Camera

Tai Audio

Metropolis Post

CineTape

CineLab

Aerial Filmworks

FJS International, LLC

rebotnix Technologies

Rig Wheels Passport

Gamma Ray Digital Inc

Technodolly

Visual Products

Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS

Abel Cine

Ritter Battery

Willys Widgets

Glidecam

Broadcast Solutions Inc

Metropolis Post

Tai Audio

CineTape

Visual Products

Wooden Camera

Gamma Ray Digital Inc

Aerial Filmworks

The Slider

Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS

Ritter Battery

FJS International, LLC

Technodolly

rebotnix Technologies

CineLab

Willys Widgets

Abel Cine

Paralinx LLC

Rig Wheels Passport