Jump to content


Photo

Sony Vegas drawbacks?


  • Please log in to reply
2 replies to this topic

#1 Macks Fiiod

Macks Fiiod
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1089 posts
  • Director
  • Og from DC, Now in NJ

Posted 17 January 2016 - 02:23 PM

I'm gonna come out and say I love using Sony Vegas. I don't aim to exclusively do post-production, and if someone did, I would recommend AVID cause it's what the majority of studios use.

 

My personal gripe with AVID is navigating the timeline takes an eternity in contrast to Vegas which allows full mobility with the scroll wheel. Someone said you can change that in AVID's settings but I haven't seen that anywhere in the program.

 

A straight answer to what makes Vegas fall short in comparison to AVID from a workflow angle has never been given to me. The most common answer is "people don't use it" but I want to know how it technically falls short from someone who has legitimate experience with both Vegas and AVID.

 

  • 0

#2 Brian Drysdale

Brian Drysdale
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 5030 posts
  • Cinematographer

Posted 17 January 2016 - 03:17 PM

One major problem is that it can't be used for collaborative editing as used on large productions. It's also not great at handling long form  projects and organising all the material involved.

 

AVID editors tend to use the keyboard because it's faster than drag and dropping. I own Vegas and it has an extremely confusing set of keyboard short cuts.


Edited by Brian Drysdale, 17 January 2016 - 03:18 PM.

  • 0

#3 Tyler Purcell

Tyler Purcell
  • Sustaining Members
  • 3570 posts
  • Other
  • Los Angeles

Posted 17 January 2016 - 04:44 PM

I mean it's like FCPX vs Avid, they're night and day different. Vegas is the same way, it uses a different way of cutting, which is fine and all, but it's not really what the industry uses. So it's great for messing around, like FCPX is. But it's not great for serious work. I mean, what you use at home on your own time for your own projects, really doesn't matter. A lot of people hate Avid... I actually don't love it, but man does it work! Had Final Cut 7 had more development, it would be my favorite editor. However, they quit developing it right when it was getting good. So Avid and Premiere are where the industry sits right now. I personally haven't bothered with premiere yet because it requires the newest operating system and Avid doesn't like it... so I'm still on Avid for 90% of my work.
  • 0


FJS International, LLC

Wooden Camera

rebotnix Technologies

Willys Widgets

Technodolly

Ritter Battery

CineTape

Glidecam

Visual Products

Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS

Paralinx LLC

Broadcast Solutions Inc

Metropolis Post

The Slider

Aerial Filmworks

Tai Audio

Gamma Ray Digital Inc

Rig Wheels Passport

Abel Cine

CineLab

FJS International, LLC

Rig Wheels Passport

CineTape

CineLab

Metropolis Post

Technodolly

The Slider

Visual Products

Wooden Camera

Broadcast Solutions Inc

Abel Cine

Ritter Battery

Gamma Ray Digital Inc

rebotnix Technologies

Aerial Filmworks

Tai Audio

Willys Widgets

Glidecam

Paralinx LLC

Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS