Jump to content


Photo

Low light camera options


  • Please log in to reply
6 replies to this topic

#1 John (Jeff) Hammond

John (Jeff) Hammond

    New

  • Basic Members
  • Pip
  • 3 posts
  • Other
  • Denver

Posted 25 February 2016 - 12:38 PM

As I'm still waiting for my 1014 Auto Zoom E to arrive, I find myself already thinking ahead to snagging a low-light camera to shoot 500 speed film indoors and outdoors. Thinking out loud, the Canon 310XL seems like a pretty good option. I know it only films at 18fps, but it's an f 1.0, and I figure if there is not a lot of movement in my shots, that might do the trick.

 

Along those lines, I'm wondering if something like the Nikon Super Zoom 8 might work as well, or even better. I know the shutter angle isn't nearly as wide, but that tells me the frames will be a little sharper, and it does film at 9fps (as well as 18 and 24), so each frame will have a longer exposure time, am I right? So, for static shots or shots with minimal movement, can I get away with shooting at 9 fps and have clean, sharp images (well, as sharp as can be expected from the format)?

 

A 514XL perhaps? Other suggestions?  A very confusing issue (for novice me, anyway), and I would really appreciate any feedback.


  • 0


#2 Jay Young

Jay Young
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 483 posts
  • Cinematographer
  • Lexington KY

Posted 25 February 2016 - 02:59 PM

Or you could attempt to light your scene properly? This comes up literally every day on reddit. 

 

What are you shooting in low-light?

 

At ASA 500, you only need like 2 foot candles of light at f1.0.. two "standard candles" will give you this output.  But the image won't be as sharp as if you stop down to somewhere in the 4/5.6 range.


  • 0

#3 Robert Houllahan

Robert Houllahan
  • Sustaining Members
  • 1575 posts
  • Industry Rep
  • Providence R.I.

Posted 25 February 2016 - 05:28 PM

I have a Bauer 107XL with a f1.2 zoom and a 220deg shutter it's very nice in low light.


  • 1

#4 Matt Stevens

Matt Stevens
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 701 posts
  • Other

Posted 26 February 2016 - 01:51 AM

The Nikon R10 does insanely well at low light. I know this from personal experience with the camera.


  • 0

#5 Will Montgomery

Will Montgomery
  • Sustaining Members
  • 2022 posts
  • Producer
  • Dallas, TX

Posted 26 February 2016 - 12:33 PM

The 310xl has just about the fastest lens on a Super 8 camera...but it's not exactly top-notch glass. You can pick one up on eBay for under $50 so I'd give it a shot and see if you're happy with the results. Very easy to use!

 

Watch out for the AF-310 as the newer autofocus version is notorious for poorly focused footage. It focuses when you first pull the trigger and remains fixed until you stop and pull it again. Still is a fun camera to hand out to kids on vacation however.


  • 0

#6 John (Jeff) Hammond

John (Jeff) Hammond

    New

  • Basic Members
  • Pip
  • 3 posts
  • Other
  • Denver

Posted 01 March 2016 - 08:04 AM

So I read on another thread I may get better low light images using faster film with a non-XL shutter vs. an XL shutter with a finer grain film. Any experiences with that?
  • 0

#7 Zac Fettig

Zac Fettig
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 338 posts
  • Other
  • Boston

Posted 01 March 2016 - 09:08 AM

So I read on another thread I may get better low light images using faster film with a non-XL shutter vs. an XL shutter with a finer grain film. Any experiences with that?

As far as I know, the fastest film available today is the Vision3 500T you're already planning on using. Which is plenty fast for most applications.

 

In my experience, a 220 degree shutter (in my case I used a Sankyo LXL 255) will give better low light performance than a 155 degree shutter (Canon 814 Autozoom Electronic). It will give weaker performance everywhere else. Low light in my case meant I lit for f2.0 with Tri-X, for both cameras.

 

You probably will get better images with a faster film in a 155 degree camera than a slower film with finer grain in a 220 degree camera. The 220 degree lens will let in about 15% more light. But 500T is 233% as sensitive as 200T. So all other things being equal, the shutter angle is not the deciding factor. The film sensitivity is.


Edited by Zac Fettig, 01 March 2016 - 09:09 AM.

  • 0


Technodolly

The Slider

Glidecam

Abel Cine

Gamma Ray Digital Inc

Broadcast Solutions Inc

FJS International, LLC

CineLab

Wooden Camera

Aerial Filmworks

Metropolis Post

Willys Widgets

rebotnix Technologies

Ritter Battery

Tai Audio

Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS

Visual Products

CineTape

Rig Wheels Passport

Paralinx LLC

The Slider

Visual Products

Technodolly

Metropolis Post

Abel Cine

Paralinx LLC

FJS International, LLC

Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS

Willys Widgets

CineLab

Tai Audio

Broadcast Solutions Inc

rebotnix Technologies

Wooden Camera

Aerial Filmworks

Ritter Battery

Glidecam

CineTape

Gamma Ray Digital Inc

Rig Wheels Passport