Jump to content


Photo

Does exposed film weigh more than unexposed film?


  • Please log in to reply
7 replies to this topic

#1 Dan Salzmann

Dan Salzmann
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1143 posts
  • Cinematographer
  • Paris, France

Posted 03 June 2005 - 04:04 AM

Does exposed film weigh more than unexposed film?
Does developed film weigh more than undeveloped film?
That's to say, do the chemical reactions that take place add weight to the filmstock?
  • 0

#2 John Pytlak RIP

John Pytlak RIP

    (deceased)

  • Sustaining Members
  • 3499 posts
  • Industry Rep
  • Rochester, NY 14650-1922

Posted 03 June 2005 - 05:34 AM

Does exposed film weigh more than unexposed film?
Does developed film weigh more than undeveloped film?
That's to say, do the chemical reactions that take place add weight to the filmstock?

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>


How much does a photon weigh? ;)

I've never seen data on this, but I assume more things (rem-jet, soluble absorber dyes, silver halide, etc.) are washed out/off of the film during processing than any added molecular weight of the dyes formed by reaction of couplers with oxidized developer. So I suspect that processed film weighs less than raw stock.
  • 0

#3 Robert Morein

Robert Morein
  • Basic Members
  • PipPip
  • 33 posts
  • Cinematographer

Posted 03 June 2005 - 05:36 AM

Does exposed film weigh more than unexposed film?
Does developed film weigh more than undeveloped film?
That's to say, do the chemical reactions that take place add weight to the filmstock?

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

Exposed film weighs no more than unexposed film.
The loss or gain in energy, which equates to mass, is miniscule, not measurable.
On the other hand, I would expect developed film to weigh less than undeveloped film, because the silver has been removed, and the antihalation backing stripped off.
  • 0

#4 Dominic Case

Dominic Case
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1357 posts
  • Other
  • Sydney Australia

Posted 03 June 2005 - 05:12 PM

Does exposed film weigh more than unexposed film?


Well, only very slightly - after all, what it's captured is only light. :rolleyes:
  • 0

#5 Robert Hughes

Robert Hughes
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 873 posts
  • Sound Department
  • Minneapolis

Posted 04 June 2005 - 01:11 AM

So I assume overexposed film will be lighter still - unless it's negative...
  • 0

#6 Dominic Case

Dominic Case
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1357 posts
  • Other
  • Sydney Australia

Posted 04 June 2005 - 06:00 PM

So I assume overexposed film will be lighter still

Not really, because over-exposure leads to a heavier negative, with more density. :lol:
  • 0

#7 John Thomas

John Thomas
  • Sustaining Members
  • 116 posts
  • Cinematographer
  • Akron, Ohio USA

Posted 04 June 2005 - 10:20 PM

I've found that poorly exposed film can weigh on you heavily.
  • 0

#8 Rich Steel

Rich Steel
  • Sustaining Members
  • 128 posts
  • Cinematographer
  • Scotland

Posted 05 June 2005 - 04:10 PM

Developed film definetly weighs more especially if you use HEAVY WATER in the chemicals....
  • 0


Metropolis Post

Visual Products

Glidecam

Aerial Filmworks

CineTape

CineLab

rebotnix Technologies

Technodolly

Wooden Camera

Rig Wheels Passport

Opal

Gamma Ray Digital Inc

Abel Cine

The Slider

Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS

Broadcast Solutions Inc

FJS International, LLC

Paralinx LLC

Tai Audio

Willys Widgets

Ritter Battery

Visual Products

CineTape

Broadcast Solutions Inc

Rig Wheels Passport

Aerial Filmworks

Willys Widgets

The Slider

Abel Cine

Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS

Metropolis Post

Opal

Wooden Camera

CineLab

FJS International, LLC

rebotnix Technologies

Paralinx LLC

Ritter Battery

Glidecam

Gamma Ray Digital Inc

Tai Audio

Technodolly