Jump to content




Photo

A friendly reminder...


  • Please log in to reply
34 replies to this topic

#1 Bill DiPietra

Bill DiPietra
  • Sustaining Members
  • 2261 posts
  • Cinematographer
  • New York City

Posted 21 April 2016 - 12:10 AM

Due to the volatile nature some threads have been taking as of late, I thought a quick review of these might be in order:

 

Forum Guidelines


  • 4




#2 David Mullen ASC

David Mullen ASC
  • Sustaining Members
  • 18788 posts
  • Cinematographer
  • Los Angeles

Posted 21 April 2016 - 10:44 AM

I don't think it's the threads that are volatile, just some of the personalities posting to them...


  • 4

#3 Keith Walters

Keith Walters
  • Sustaining Members
  • 2131 posts
  • Other
  • Sydney Australia

Posted 23 April 2016 - 05:11 AM

Due to the volatile nature some threads have been taking as of late

So where was this?

I have seen quite a few posts that can best be described as "egregious" but I don't think anybody can be bothered replying anymore.


  • 0

#4 Landon D. Parks

Landon D. Parks
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1626 posts
  • Producer
  • Cincinnati, Ohio

Posted 23 April 2016 - 06:29 AM

Yeah, I also don't see any of these threads that are anything that would go against the forum rules. I know Tyler and myself have had some arguments in a few threads, but we have kept it civil and to the facts. Other than that, I haven't really seen any threads I'd deem as 'bad'.


  • 0

#5 JD Hartman

JD Hartman
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1488 posts
  • Gaffer
  • Edison, N.J. U.S.A.

Posted 23 April 2016 - 06:35 AM

Contentious and argumentative posters can be moderated, awarded warning points, blocked, banned, etc. 

 

Do we really need a 'net nanny on this board?

 

Sometime a fresh idea or new perspective can come out of a heated discussion. 


  • 0

#6 David Mullen ASC

David Mullen ASC
  • Sustaining Members
  • 18788 posts
  • Cinematographer
  • Los Angeles

Posted 23 April 2016 - 10:43 AM

Clearly there had been a problem lately with threads descending to the level of personal jibes. This forum is barely moderated at all and it could stay that way if people can resist getting personal. But if certain members keep up with the unpleasant comments and poor attitude, then they are basically going to force the issue of moderation.
  • 0

#7 JD Hartman

JD Hartman
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1488 posts
  • Gaffer
  • Edison, N.J. U.S.A.

Posted 23 April 2016 - 04:04 PM

I think we can police this board ourselves, occasionally calling Tim's attention to those posts that stray outside the norms of civility.


  • 0

#8 Gregg MacPherson

Gregg MacPherson
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1514 posts
  • Other
  • New Zealand

Posted 23 April 2016 - 05:19 PM

No-one has been called a "vacuous ball sack" lately so things are probably not that bad.  What?  Google that with cinematography.com and Matthew Philips in the search string.

 

I'm not following the threads that may be provoking some discord lately.  Aside from that, there are a tiny number of self proffessed experts on the forum who do provoke a response akin to genuine nausia. 


  • 0

#9 David Mullen ASC

David Mullen ASC
  • Sustaining Members
  • 18788 posts
  • Cinematographer
  • Los Angeles

Posted 23 April 2016 - 05:55 PM

No-one has been called a "vacuous ball sack" lately so things are probably not that bad.


Someone was called a d--- lately, which is only a notch above the insult you mentioned, both figuratively and literally.
  • 1

#10 Gregg MacPherson

Gregg MacPherson
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1514 posts
  • Other
  • New Zealand

Posted 23 April 2016 - 06:29 PM

I'm missing out on spectating all the schoolyard fights.


  • 0

#11 Tyler Purcell

Tyler Purcell
  • Sustaining Members
  • 2350 posts
  • Other
  • Los Angeles

Posted 24 April 2016 - 12:34 AM

Digital sucks.  :rolleyes:


  • 0

#12 Landon D. Parks

Landon D. Parks
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1626 posts
  • Producer
  • Cincinnati, Ohio

Posted 24 April 2016 - 01:50 AM

Tyler, watch your language! We don't need none of that digital hatin' stuff 'round here! After all, we can all agree that film is dead. Opps, is dead a bad word? *Sarcasm*


  • 0

#13 Carl Looper

Carl Looper
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1367 posts
  • Digital Image Technician
  • Melbourne, Australia

Posted 24 April 2016 - 03:34 AM

My line is that film has been dead for decades, but that hasn't stopped anyone from using it, talking about it, screening it, and so on. A bit like so called vintage cars. They are long dead but that hasn't stopped them from being driven around, particularly at car shows (and on car shows - on tv) devoted to such, but also on the public road, and they remain just as wonderful and fascinating as when they were alive. Indeed, one could say they are even more so. I treat this as a kind of ghost effect but a real one as distinct from a fake one. Will digital enjoy the same afterlife? We may not be around to see that but I assume it will - unless modernism succeeds in destroying it's own history, as it often seems bent on doing. No doubt quantum computing will be the next paradigm shift and one can imagine quantum cameras of some unimaginable sort - perhaps eventually explaining those cameras on spaceships from the 1960s, where they could get a wide-angle closeup of an enemy ship on their video (rear projected film) displays, despite their ship being miles away from the enemy one.

 

C


Edited by Carl Looper, 24 April 2016 - 03:43 AM.

  • 0

#14 Carl Looper

Carl Looper
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1367 posts
  • Digital Image Technician
  • Melbourne, Australia

Posted 24 April 2016 - 03:52 AM

st-menagerie16.jpg?resize=740%2C555&type


  • 0

#15 Satsuki Murashige

Satsuki Murashige
  • Sustaining Members
  • 3081 posts
  • Cinematographer
  • San Francisco, CA

Posted 24 April 2016 - 07:16 AM

image.gif
  • 0

#16 Landon D. Parks

Landon D. Parks
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1626 posts
  • Producer
  • Cincinnati, Ohio

Posted 24 April 2016 - 04:27 PM

Loves me some Sam Elliot... Not in a weird way, I just idolize the guy.  B)


  • 0

#17 Richard Boddington

Richard Boddington
  • Sustaining Members
  • 5188 posts
  • Director

Posted 24 April 2016 - 09:04 PM

Due to the volatile nature some threads have been taking as of late, I thought a quick review of these might be in order:

 

Forum Guidelines

 

Geez no point in even owning a computer and having an internet connection then.

 

I wonder what this forum would be like if it was all women?

 

R,


  • 0

#18 Macks Fiiod

Macks Fiiod
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 428 posts
  • Director
  • OG from DC, Now in NJ

Posted 24 April 2016 - 11:52 PM

Posting here is a bit polarizing for me. I've been on forums that encourage verbal harassment lol. Much more important to be civil on places like this dealing with actual crafts and not the Simpsons Forums or whatever.


  • 0

#19 Carl Looper

Carl Looper
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1367 posts
  • Digital Image Technician
  • Melbourne, Australia

Posted 25 April 2016 - 06:41 AM

I'm occasionally guility of breaking the following rule in terms of a short reply such as a smiley (and phecussing a little bit every now and then), but I do try to avoid large quotes (and will edit an entire quote down to the relevant passage). I think that's quite appropriate. But I don't think that many people do actually read a thread from beginning to end, so some sort of localised quote/context is necessary. My experience is that many will just jump right into the middle of a debate without having read it's history.

 

Please do not create useless posts. Posts with one or two words (e.g. LOL or I agree. or Ditto.) are wasteful and are routinely removed by the administrator. Please do not quote a large portion of a previous message in your post. A threaded discussion is most often read from the start, so the reader will usually understand that you are referring to a previous message without needing to re-read it in your post.


Edited by Carl Looper, 25 April 2016 - 06:47 AM.

  • 0

#20 Macks Fiiod

Macks Fiiod
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 428 posts
  • Director
  • OG from DC, Now in NJ

Posted 25 April 2016 - 02:33 PM

 

 

 I do try to avoid large quotes (and will edit an entire quote down to the relevant passage). I think that's quite appropriate. But I don't think that many people do actually read a thread from beginning to end, so some sort of localised quote/context is necessary.

I've seen forums that've had their UI destroyed by dozens of endless quote chains.


  • 0


Broadcast Solutions Inc

Willys Widgets

Technodolly

Visual Products

Pro 8mm

The Slider

CineTape

Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS

Abel Cine

Glidecam

Zylight

Aerial Filmworks

rebotnix Technologies

Tai Audio

Paralinx LLC

Rig Wheels Passport

CineLab

Ritter Battery

The Slider

Aerial Filmworks

Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS

rebotnix Technologies

Tai Audio

Paralinx LLC

Technodolly

Visual Products

Willys Widgets

CineLab

Ritter Battery

Abel Cine

Zylight

Rig Wheels Passport

Broadcast Solutions Inc

Glidecam

Pro 8mm

CineTape