Jump to content


Photo

Transfer 16mm material to ProRes

Telecine film film transfer film scanning

  • Please log in to reply
2 replies to this topic

#1 Ricky Dominguez

Ricky Dominguez

    New

  • Basic Members
  • Pip
  • 1 posts
  • Editor
  • Puerto Rico

Posted 11 May 2016 - 11:56 AM

Hi my name is Ricky Dominguez form Luna Films in Puerto Rico and we want to transfer all the 16mm material (22,620 ft) that was recorder for a documentary in the 90’s and I want your opinion in what is the best option that you recommend and why.

First we have 21,820 ft of negative material and 800 ft of positive from a workprint because the original (negative) material was lost.

What should we use to do the transfer, film scanning or telecine, witch one is better and why.

What machine would you recommend to do the transfer.

What size, 1080, 2K, 3K, 4K and why. Occasionally we will use the same shot as medium shot and then closeup, the documentary will be finish at 1080p so 2K and higher will be better to reframe.

We use FCP X so I think ProRes would be the best option but which one 422, 422 HQ, 4444, 4444 XQ

What company do you recommend to do the transfer and why.  

 

As always the budget is limited so what would be the best price for a good quality film transfer.

 

Thanks for all the help.

 

Ricky Dominguez


  • 0

#2 aapo lettinen

aapo lettinen
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1151 posts
  • Other
  • Finland

Posted 11 May 2016 - 12:34 PM

it is close to 10 hours of footage total? the best approach would maybe be to do a telecine transfer of all the material with keykode numbers, editing offline and then scanning selects to 3K or 4K using prores XQ, dpx or tiff.  you can use cheapest format for telecine that way and telecine first light if money is a concern, to a easy format like fullhd ProresHQ or ProresLT.

 

I personally usually ask for fullhd or 2k technical grade prores444 or xq scan of all the shot material and finish the film from that fist scan but it is rather expensive for 10hours of material and if you want to do zoom ins in edit like you mentioned you will probably need at least 3k. 

 

the third way would be telecine all to cheapest format, edit it, then negative cutting with keykode numbers and scanning the roughly cut negative. saves time in scanning but I don't know how cost effective it would be for the project. My approach of scanning all to the mid quality format the first time is practical if you have to later use lots of the same material for other projects. but it is more expensive as mentioned and you may still need to re scan the edit zoom pieces later anyway


  • 0

#3 Rafael Rivera

Rafael Rivera
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 121 posts
  • Director
  • San Jose, CA

Posted 19 May 2016 - 05:19 PM

Sent you a PM


  • 0



Visual Products

Willys Widgets

New Pro Video - New and Used Equipment

FJS International, LLC

Tai Audio

Abel Cine

Wooden Camera

Gamma Ray Digital Inc

Glidecam

rebotnix Technologies

Technodolly

Paralinx LLC

Rig Wheels Passport

Metropolis Post

Broadcast Solutions Inc

The Slider

CineTape

Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS

CineLab

Ritter Battery

Aerial Filmworks

Glidecam

Wooden Camera

Broadcast Solutions Inc

Ritter Battery

Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS

Gamma Ray Digital Inc

FJS International, LLC

Metropolis Post

CineLab

Paralinx LLC

rebotnix Technologies

Aerial Filmworks

New Pro Video - New and Used Equipment

Technodolly

Rig Wheels Passport

Willys Widgets

Visual Products

The Slider

CineTape

Abel Cine

Tai Audio