Jump to content


Photo

Question for Mr. Mullen


  • Please log in to reply
106 replies to this topic

#1 Ckulakov

Ckulakov
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 193 posts
  • Student
  • Washington D.C.

Posted 08 June 2005 - 12:24 PM

Dear Mr. Mullen,

I know this is not the best question to ask, but if you dont mind me asking. How much money did the production company pay you for photographing the film "NORTHFORK"? If you dont whant to answere it is totally fine with me. The reason I am asking is because I whant to have an idea of the income for a film of that scale.

Thank You
  • 0

#2 David Mullen ASC

David Mullen ASC
  • Sustaining Members
  • 19759 posts
  • Cinematographer
  • Los Angeles

Posted 08 June 2005 - 01:01 PM

I wasn't paid what I normally would make for a film of that budget anyway...

We all took a flat $1000/week deal, every crew member high and low. I did it as a favor (just as a warning to those who think they can hit me up for more favors of that kind...) That deal is more typical of a half-million dollar film but this was a 1.5 million dollar film. However, the location shoot and set building took up an inordinate amount of the budget. The actors worked at scale I believe.

A DP would probably have been paid $2500/wk to $3000/wk on a film of that budget, if not more.
  • 0

#3 Stephen Williams

Stephen Williams
  • Sustaining Members
  • 4708 posts
  • Cinematographer
  • Europe

Posted 08 June 2005 - 01:24 PM

We all took a flat $1000/week deal, every crew member high and low.  I did it as a favor (just as a warning to those who think they can hit me up for more favors of that kind...) That deal is more typical of a half-million dollar film but this was a 1.5 million dollar film. However, the location shoot and set building took up an inordinate amount of the budget. The actors worked at scale I believe.

A DP would probably have been paid $2500/wk to $3000/wk on a film of that budget, if not more.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>


David,

They got a wonderful deal! Do you know what is the Union rate for a Film?

Stephen

www.stephenw.com
  • 0

#4 David Mullen ASC

David Mullen ASC
  • Sustaining Members
  • 19759 posts
  • Cinematographer
  • Los Angeles

Posted 08 June 2005 - 01:32 PM

There are many rates for union productions, some tiered to budget. There are a couple of levels to the IA Low-Budget Agreement, plus on the East Coast you have something called the East Coast Council Deal for films below a certain budget.

In the regular IA agreement, which tends to cover films over 6 mil. in budget I believe (I'm really not qualified to be talking about these issues though -- you'd want to talk to a union rep), the rates listed on my card say:

Assuming an 8-hour day (1.5X rate for work after 8 hours):

DP: $626.56/day
Operator: $385.15/day
1st AC: $279.76/day
2nd AC: $257.52/day

I don't know what the Low-Budget Agreement rates are, and they don't list any rates for a DP anyway -- it's sort of up to me to get whatever deal I can manage, which is a major pain-in-the-a... -- I guess they figured that a DP could manage to work out a better deal than the low-budget agreement could get them, but that isn't really true.
  • 0

#5 Alex Ellerman

Alex Ellerman
  • Sustaining Members
  • 228 posts
  • Other
  • Chicago

Posted 08 June 2005 - 01:43 PM

Just a tag on question... when you say 1k a week, or even 2-3k per week David, does that include any prep time? or do low budgets expect you to prep for free? or a reduced rate?

thank you immensely~
theturnaround
  • 0

#6 Phil Rhodes

Phil Rhodes
  • Sustaining Members
  • 11937 posts
  • Other

Posted 08 June 2005 - 01:47 PM

Hi,

In my experience it's easier to make decent rates on corporates and music promos. The dramatic stuff is sought after work, particularly in London. I've rarely been paid more than the train fare to shoot drama.

Phil
  • 0

#7 David Mullen ASC

David Mullen ASC
  • Sustaining Members
  • 19759 posts
  • Cinematographer
  • Los Angeles

Posted 08 June 2005 - 03:16 PM

Features pay worse on a day-to-day basis than almost anything, including EPK work. But you work more days...

There's usually a couple of weeks of paid prep budgeted for a DP, depending on what you can negotiate. Truth is, you work as much prep as necessary, whether or not you get paid for all of it. I might put in at least a month of prep on a small feature, but they might not pay for that many weeks.

I think I got four weeks of paid prep for a six week shoot for "Akeelah and the Bee", which is typical for a film of that budget. The most I got was on "Shadowboxer", because the director/producer wanted everyone on payroll as soon as possible. I got 11 weeks of paid prep for a seven week shoot, which is unusual. Part of that was because production pushed two weeks just before the first day, extending my prep.

Back when I was shooting more three-week features, I usually got paid for one week of prep.
  • 0

#8 Brian Wells

Brian Wells
  • Sustaining Members
  • 438 posts
  • Other

Posted 08 June 2005 - 04:21 PM

Respectfully, this just doesn't seem as high of a rate as I had thought. Like you've said on here before your interest is in making movies not becoming wealthy--which is a wonderful thing. When you consider that as a feature D.P. all the equipment is provided (contrast to a commercial d.p. who owns gear) you get the best of all worlds: getting to do what you love without having notes on equipment. What you do is really cool and is what I'd like to do someday.. This isn't a "let me know how to succeed" post, but more like "you lead a cool life and it's admirable" type of post. I hope this makes sense. Best wishes (from a college little guy). As an aside, what are the three screengrabs on davidmullenasc.com from? I really like all of them, especially the first one. I'd like to see these projects if they are available.

Thanks,

Brian
  • 0

#9 Phil Rhodes

Phil Rhodes
  • Sustaining Members
  • 11937 posts
  • Other

Posted 08 June 2005 - 04:35 PM

Hi,

I don't really know anything about how Hollywood works, but if it's anything like London I think you'll find it's very variable. Pay for most stuff seems to be based on the desirability of the project, how busy the person in question has been recently, whether their best friend/favourite client is attached to direct/produce, whether one or both agents are sleeping with somebody on the production team... I'm not sure how worthwhile it could ever be to take an example and say "I'm surprised..." because you'll always be surprised.

Phil
  • 0

#10 Richard Boddington

Richard Boddington
  • Sustaining Members
  • 5482 posts
  • Director

Posted 08 June 2005 - 06:11 PM

"Respectfully, this just doesn't seem as high of a rate as I had thought. "

This is a common realization that people aspiring to work in the film industry come to.

Problem is that people grow up watching Entertainment Tonight and all they hear about are the people that get paid millions and millions to work in the movies. So they start to think it must be like that for every one.

Fact is those salaries are reserved for the top .5 - 1 %.


R,
  • 0

#11 David Mullen ASC

David Mullen ASC
  • Sustaining Members
  • 19759 posts
  • Cinematographer
  • Los Angeles

Posted 08 June 2005 - 06:15 PM

Yes, it's surprising how LOW and how HIGH the rates can be... That's why when some student asks how much a DP makes in a year, the answer is "Zero to over a million dollars."

The only thing you can really quote are the minimum IA rates. Now you can ask "who makes IA minimum?" but the truth is quite a bit do. If they are lucky.

My website is just a closet to stuff frame grabs -- there must be hundreds hidden on the site but those three are digital stills taken from the sets of "Dot" (now "The Quiet"), "Shadowboxer", and "When Do We Eat?".
  • 0

#12 Phil Rhodes

Phil Rhodes
  • Sustaining Members
  • 11937 posts
  • Other

Posted 08 June 2005 - 06:16 PM

Hi,

The second realisation is that even the "not very high" rates we've been talking about here are reserved for the top 5%.

Everyone else works three jobs to pay the rent.

Phil
  • 0

#13 Daniel J. Ashley-Smith

Daniel J. Ashley-Smith
  • Guests

Posted 08 June 2005 - 06:33 PM

Actually if the figures David quoted are accurate, then, wow.... David, hows it going in that mansion of yours with all your jags and porches??!!

I NEVER thought it would be that high, I was thinking more £150 a day, at the most.

And here I am stuck working in Chas Norman Cameras for a crappy £25.50 an 8 and a half hour day!!!! :angry:

Well I'm glad someone finally had the guts to ask David that question, I really wanted to but I was too scared he might take it as being rude.
  • 0

#14 Phil Rhodes

Phil Rhodes
  • Sustaining Members
  • 11937 posts
  • Other

Posted 08 June 2005 - 07:16 PM

Hi,

Daniel, have you checked house prices recently?

Phil
  • 0

#15 Daniel J. Ashley-Smith

Daniel J. Ashley-Smith
  • Guests

Posted 08 June 2005 - 07:18 PM

Daniel, have you checked house prices recently?

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

No, why? Anyway their dirt cheap out in America so on that kind of pay you really would get a mansion. Even in england you could afford to get something pretty big on that wage.
  • 0

#16 Phil Rhodes

Phil Rhodes
  • Sustaining Members
  • 11937 posts
  • Other

Posted 08 June 2005 - 07:23 PM

Hi,

Sigh.

This is why we don't usually discuss wages, isn't it...

Phil
  • 0

#17 Dominic Jones

Dominic Jones
  • Basic Members
  • PipPip
  • 12 posts
  • Cinematographer

Posted 08 June 2005 - 07:46 PM

Hi David,

Very impressive work on Northfork, congratulations. I saw the article on it here a while ago and have just today found the forums - this is an amazing resource...

I'm planning on lighting a 35mm short for a friend and colleague of mine, Callum Reid, at some point entitled "Layman" in which we are also seeking to use non-digital desaturation techniques such as ENR and flashing the neg - could I ask you a few questions about stocks, level of ENR used, etc. as long as you don't feel it's encroaching on your preofessional territory, so to speak?

I'd be very interested to get the benefit of your wisdom - needless to say, we'll be testing extensively ourselves, but I have not used many of these techniques before and would be very grateful for any and all advice you have to offer...

I hope you don't feel this question rude or invasive (and of course, please feel free to decline if you feel it is) - it seems to be the season for it, doesn't it?!
  • 0

#18 David Mullen ASC

David Mullen ASC
  • Sustaining Members
  • 19759 posts
  • Cinematographer
  • Los Angeles

Posted 08 June 2005 - 07:49 PM

I don't think Daniel is aware of just how few days of the year one works. I've worked 10 weeks total so far this year, and it's mid-June, so that's like 10 weeks out of 26 or so (the upside is that I have time to answer so many questions here...)

And even if you have a good year, you may have a few weak years after that so it would make more sense to look at a three-year average.

As for housing prices, they are astronomical here in Los Angeles!

Generally it's considered rude to discuss one's income, but I feel that it may be informative to others out there, so I'm willing. However, income varies WILDLY from person to person in this industry, so there isn't such a thing as a "typical" case. I'm sure my agent wouldn't want me to discuss my salary, since a production often makes you an offer based on what you made in the past, as in "but we heard he did 'x' movie for only 'x' amount of money? Why should we pay more?"
  • 0

#19 David Mullen ASC

David Mullen ASC
  • Sustaining Members
  • 19759 posts
  • Cinematographer
  • Los Angeles

Posted 08 June 2005 - 07:52 PM

A lot of info on "Northfork" is here:
http://www.cinematog...cles/northfork/

I also discussed it here before, so do a search. I shot the movie in late Spring 2002 and there might be some journal entries from that time here in the forum.
  • 0

#20 Richard Boddington

Richard Boddington
  • Sustaining Members
  • 5482 posts
  • Director

Posted 08 June 2005 - 07:55 PM

"No, why? Anyway their dirt cheap out in America so on that kind of pay you really would get a mansion. Even in england you could afford to get something pretty big on that wage. "

Daniel,

Come on start doing some maths or sums.

First, have you heard of a thing called TAXES? Ever heard of those?

Let's say you make $2000.00 per week as a DOP on a film, the tax man will want about 40% of that in the USA when you add in the self employment tax. Plus you'll need to buy health insurance working in the USA, they don't have NHS you know.

Next have you looked at house prices in the LA area? 600k will get you decent little house, not a mansion by any stretch of the imagination.

Next you have to keep working every week of the year in order to have a high income. Guess what film work is five weeks here and 10 weeks there, it's not 9-5 Mon-Fri 50 weeks a year. Come on you know this.

So you think you'll be living the high life in America eh, sitting in your mansion that you bought for $45,000.00?

Think again, you're a bright guy.

R,
  • 0


Tai Audio

The Slider

Glidecam

Rig Wheels Passport

Broadcast Solutions Inc

CineTape

Ritter Battery

FJS International, LLC

Aerial Filmworks

Gamma Ray Digital Inc

rebotnix Technologies

Technodolly

Opal

Visual Products

Wooden Camera

Willys Widgets

Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS

Metropolis Post

CineLab

Paralinx LLC

Abel Cine

Aerial Filmworks

Willys Widgets

Paralinx LLC

The Slider

Visual Products

CineLab

Technodolly

rebotnix Technologies

FJS International, LLC

CineTape

Opal

Glidecam

Rig Wheels Passport

Wooden Camera

Gamma Ray Digital Inc

Abel Cine

Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS

Metropolis Post

Tai Audio

Broadcast Solutions Inc

Ritter Battery