Jump to content




Photo

Camera Recomendation


  • Please log in to reply
6 replies to this topic

#1 Mark Day

Mark Day
  • Basic Members
  • PipPip
  • 62 posts
  • Electrician
  • Greenville, SC

Posted 10 June 2016 - 12:05 PM

So, can anyone suggest a good "entry" level camera that doesn't cost a fortune?  I'm talking $3K or less for camera alone.  I've been looking at Blackmagic, but I see mixed reviews here.  I'm not new to digital photography and I've done a little film work, but it appears digital is the way to go.  Like I said, $3K or less and 2.5K resolution.  4K would be optimal, but it appears those would be out of my budget.

Thanks.


  • 0




#2 Tyler Purcell

Tyler Purcell
  • Sustaining Members
  • 2352 posts
  • Other
  • Los Angeles

Posted 10 June 2016 - 12:58 PM

What kind of work are you doing? What specs are you looking for?
  • 0

#3 Tom Yanowitz

Tom Yanowitz
  • Basic Members
  • PipPip
  • 64 posts
  • Cinematographer
  • ENS Louis Lumiere student, Paris

Posted 10 June 2016 - 02:27 PM

My choice would depends on what you want to sacrifice.

Great sensor but poor video file (hence poor postproduction) : sony a7s II

Mediocre sensor but raw video file : blackmagic cameras


  • 0

#4 Mark Day

Mark Day
  • Basic Members
  • PipPip
  • 62 posts
  • Electrician
  • Greenville, SC

Posted 14 June 2016 - 04:32 PM

Well, I really like doing nature.  Not in a documentary style, but just subject matter with background tracks.  I realize that this is going to require a rather expensive telephoto lens.  I'd like 4K if I can afford it, but I think 2.5K could be good.  Or not.  I don't know.


  • 0

#5 Phil Rhodes

Phil Rhodes
  • Sustaining Members
  • 11223 posts
  • Other

Posted 14 June 2016 - 05:43 PM

Most of the blackmagic stuff is fine.The 4K doesn't have the dynamic range or low noise of the 2.5, but that's reasonable - it's not a bad camera.

 

At that price level you're looking at Blackmagic, or a DSLR from Canon, Sony or Panasonic.

 

Also look at JVC - they're cruelly overlooked.

 

P


  • 0

#6 Tyler Purcell

Tyler Purcell
  • Sustaining Members
  • 2352 posts
  • Other
  • Los Angeles

Posted 14 June 2016 - 06:05 PM

Well, I really like doing nature.  Not in a documentary style, but just subject matter with background tracks.  I realize that this is going to require a rather expensive telephoto lens.  I'd like 4K if I can afford it, but I think 2.5K could be good.  Or not.  I don't know.


So the next question is; who will be seeing your videos? What is the highest form of distribution (if any) do you expect?
  • 0

#7 Jan Tore Soerensen

Jan Tore Soerensen
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 156 posts
  • Director
  • Norway

Posted 15 June 2016 - 07:44 AM

You'd really rather want a Blackmagic over a DSLR. The image quality is on another level. It's all in the detail and dynamic range. I've shot on 5d2, 7d and now the BMC2,5. If you can afford it, I would also look at the a7s2, which has the internal stabilizer and 4k@100mbps. I'd take that over the BMC.

 

Blackmagic has had huge problems with their sensors and customer support. I would not really feel comfortable buying a URSA mini myself. My BMC also shows some problems in lowlight at 1600iso. No problems at 800 though.

 

As already stated, it boils down to use.


  • 0


Broadcast Solutions Inc

CineTape

rebotnix Technologies

Rig Wheels Passport

Glidecam

Abel Cine

Aerial Filmworks

CineLab

The Slider

Zylight

Willys Widgets

Tai Audio

Paralinx LLC

Technodolly

Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS

Visual Products

Pro 8mm

Ritter Battery

Glidecam

CineLab

Abel Cine

Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS

Zylight

Aerial Filmworks

Rig Wheels Passport

Broadcast Solutions Inc

Willys Widgets

Visual Products

Pro 8mm

Tai Audio

Technodolly

The Slider

CineTape

Ritter Battery

rebotnix Technologies

Paralinx LLC