Jump to content


Photo

Camera Recomendation


  • Please log in to reply
6 replies to this topic

#1 Mark Day

Mark Day
  • Basic Members
  • PipPip
  • 78 posts
  • Cinematographer
  • Greenville, SC

Posted 10 June 2016 - 12:05 PM

So, can anyone suggest a good "entry" level camera that doesn't cost a fortune?  I'm talking $3K or less for camera alone.  I've been looking at Blackmagic, but I see mixed reviews here.  I'm not new to digital photography and I've done a little film work, but it appears digital is the way to go.  Like I said, $3K or less and 2.5K resolution.  4K would be optimal, but it appears those would be out of my budget.

Thanks.


  • 0


#2 Tyler Purcell

Tyler Purcell
  • Sustaining Members
  • 3543 posts
  • Other
  • Los Angeles

Posted 10 June 2016 - 12:58 PM

What kind of work are you doing? What specs are you looking for?
  • 0

#3 Tom Yanowitz

Tom Yanowitz
  • Basic Members
  • PipPip
  • 73 posts
  • Cinematographer
  • Paris

Posted 10 June 2016 - 02:27 PM

My choice would depends on what you want to sacrifice.

Great sensor but poor video file (hence poor postproduction) : sony a7s II

Mediocre sensor but raw video file : blackmagic cameras


  • 0

#4 Mark Day

Mark Day
  • Basic Members
  • PipPip
  • 78 posts
  • Cinematographer
  • Greenville, SC

Posted 14 June 2016 - 04:32 PM

Well, I really like doing nature.  Not in a documentary style, but just subject matter with background tracks.  I realize that this is going to require a rather expensive telephoto lens.  I'd like 4K if I can afford it, but I think 2.5K could be good.  Or not.  I don't know.


  • 0

#5 Phil Rhodes

Phil Rhodes
  • Sustaining Members
  • 11877 posts
  • Other

Posted 14 June 2016 - 05:43 PM

Most of the blackmagic stuff is fine.The 4K doesn't have the dynamic range or low noise of the 2.5, but that's reasonable - it's not a bad camera.

 

At that price level you're looking at Blackmagic, or a DSLR from Canon, Sony or Panasonic.

 

Also look at JVC - they're cruelly overlooked.

 

P


  • 0

#6 Tyler Purcell

Tyler Purcell
  • Sustaining Members
  • 3543 posts
  • Other
  • Los Angeles

Posted 14 June 2016 - 06:05 PM

Well, I really like doing nature.  Not in a documentary style, but just subject matter with background tracks.  I realize that this is going to require a rather expensive telephoto lens.  I'd like 4K if I can afford it, but I think 2.5K could be good.  Or not.  I don't know.


So the next question is; who will be seeing your videos? What is the highest form of distribution (if any) do you expect?
  • 0

#7 Jan Tore Soerensen

Jan Tore Soerensen
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 174 posts
  • Director
  • Norway

Posted 15 June 2016 - 07:44 AM

You'd really rather want a Blackmagic over a DSLR. The image quality is on another level. It's all in the detail and dynamic range. I've shot on 5d2, 7d and now the BMC2,5. If you can afford it, I would also look at the a7s2, which has the internal stabilizer and 4k@100mbps. I'd take that over the BMC.

 

Blackmagic has had huge problems with their sensors and customer support. I would not really feel comfortable buying a URSA mini myself. My BMC also shows some problems in lowlight at 1600iso. No problems at 800 though.

 

As already stated, it boils down to use.


  • 0


Paralinx LLC

Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS

Glidecam

Gamma Ray Digital Inc

rebotnix Technologies

Aerial Filmworks

The Slider

Abel Cine

Broadcast Solutions Inc

Visual Products

Wooden Camera

Technodolly

Willys Widgets

Ritter Battery

FJS International, LLC

Tai Audio

Rig Wheels Passport

Metropolis Post

CineLab

CineTape

Glidecam

Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS

Metropolis Post

Willys Widgets

Broadcast Solutions Inc

Rig Wheels Passport

The Slider

Paralinx LLC

rebotnix Technologies

Ritter Battery

FJS International, LLC

Abel Cine

CineTape

CineLab

Aerial Filmworks

Gamma Ray Digital Inc

Visual Products

Wooden Camera

Technodolly

Tai Audio