Working on a short film, shot on Super 16mm. Well I just have a humble converted K-3, so the frame rate is not exactly 'accurate'. Sound will all be added in post. But I wonder why all labs here in Europe have a default film scanning frame rate of 25 fps and in the US it is 24 fps. Especially since all cameras I know of meant for screening (as opposed to European TV) always have a frame rate of 24fps, including the old Super 8mm sound cameras.
I know that 25fps comes from the old PAL television standard (50 fields per second, 25 frames - all movies shot at 24 fps ran slightly faster to be in sync with the TV standard).
I would like to choose a frame rate which is the most compatible with HD 1080p. No planning on getting my humble movie projected theatrically, but I would like to have it as compatible as possible with existing (and if possible future) standards. Also: if I work at 25fps and it will be played back at 24fps or vice-versa (not sure about the digital tech details though), the sound will be altered. At the very least its speed and probably also the pitch, as was the case back in the analog days - which is bad especially for music. Any tune recorded at 24fps and played back at 25fps is almost a half step higher and the tempo is faster (I am a pro musician and I checked it many times). I would love to work at 24fps, simply because it's the cinema standard. My main concerns are compatibility and sound. The look of 24fps vs 25fps is virtually indistinguishable (IMHO) on modern screens and monitors.
Technically a scan has no frame rate, it's a scan of each individual film frame -- it's up to you as to the speed you want to play back the frames.
Frame rates come more into the picture, so to speak, if you are doing a telecine transfer to a video format.
But even in Europe, you should be able to get a scan or a telecine transfer to a non-broadcast format, let's say, 2K ProRes in whatever aspect ratio you want, and at 24P if you want.
If you plan on just watching the footage on your computer, then a 24P file will play fine, and even a DVD or blu-ray player can show 24P material on a TV set, converting it to the display rate of the monitor. But for anything handed over for broadcast, you'd have to convert the file to either a 50Hz or 60Hz standard.
I think you will find that at some point, your 24P project might get shown at 25 fps in Europe somewhere... but not being European, I'm guessing a bit here, you'd get a better answer from someone in PAL-land.
the scanning fps does not matter if you are not transferring sound from the film at the same time.
The 24/25fps or 25/24fps speed change is a simple metadata change or clicking a button in edit, takes two seconds. As long as the film frames are transferred 1:1 to video frames (no telecine conversion) it does not matter at all.
Here in Finland movies are shot for theatrical release at 24.00fps and for television at 25.00fps always. It it's a TV movie (normally in these cases, a documentary feature) which is later decided to also be released theatrically it is usually shot and edited + post made at 25fps and then the final image conformed to 24.00fps for DCP and separate audio mix done for 24.00fps dcp.
In some countries, I have heard, it is quite normal to shoot at 25fps even when shooting mainly for cinema release. One of the reasons we always shoot 24fps in camera for cinema release here may be that we are so used to convert all the foreign movies from 24 to 25 with audio speed change that it is just practical to use the same workflow also with our own movies.
I recommend just scanning at whichever framerate is easier and more economical and just conforming the playback rate in edit to whichever was the rate in camera. then syncing the audio and editing normally. If you are doing separate 24fps (bluray, web, DCP) and 25fps (TV, dvd) releases you will make the version after the editing and image post is done, just remember to ask for both the 24fps and 25fps soundtrack masters (they are different lenght and there is some work involved when doing the speed change but for image it is just a simple click of a button with zero quality loss when swithing between 24 and 25)
for exporting to NTSC countries: 24.00fps (and they can convert it later to 29.976 if absolutely necessary)
always do the framerate changes to image by conforming so that all the frames are 1:1 and the program lenght in seconds will change, then change the audio speed to match the different program lenght.
Ghosting and double frames are much more apparent in the final product than couple of % audio speed change (most people don't notice it at all when the audio pitch change is compensated at the same time) so this is the best way to do the conversion quality-wise.
Edited by aapo lettinen, 18 November 2016 - 08:05 AM.
Yes: the audio change in pitch is much less distracting (if noticeable at all to viewers) than those nasty "dissolving double frames", old school NTSC 3:2 pull down and repeated frames. I love seeing film being shown each frame in full and for the exact same duration (like old school film projection). No jerky motion. This is the max priority, not the exact frame rate itself by a rather narrow margin (as long as the audio remains 100% in sync).
I will choose what ever is the most affordable, produce the audio in perfect sync and take it from there.
Thanks a lot again - this was very helpful.
Edited by Christian Schonberger, 18 November 2016 - 08:33 AM.