Wally Pfister photochemical grade
Posted 22 November 2016 - 09:07 AM
Support Cinematography.com and buy gear using our Amazon links!
PANASONIC LUMIX GH5 Body 4K Mirrorless Camera, 20.3 Megapixels, Dual I.S. 2.0, 4K 422 10-bit, Full Size HDMI Out, 3 Inch Touch LCD, DC-GH5KBODY (USA Black)
Posted 22 November 2016 - 12:18 PM
Prints have better blacks than digital projection (other than laser projection). I had a lot of contrast and deep blacks in my prints of "The Love Witch" too, just from overexposing the negative and printing at higher numbers.
There's no secret tricks involved.
But you posted a frame from a digital source, so obviously black level, contrast, and saturation are set digitally even if transferred from a timed IP. I could easily make this image washed-out if I wanted to in Photoshop and so could have the person doing the home video transfer.
Black level in a print is the function of the printer lights combined with the design of the print stock. Processing is standardized though development can tweak the contrast a little. Forget lighting for a moment -- imagine sending an unexposed roll of film to the lab and having it processed and printed. Then imagine making prints using lights in the 10's, 20's, 30's, and 40's. The print made at the higher numbers will have deeper blacks. Deeper blacks would give an image more contrast and saturation.
Posted 22 November 2016 - 03:43 PM
The digital versions of these movies all pass through a conventional color correction suite. Yes the DP usually approves the grade, but it has to conform to REC709 which has a narrower dynamic range then a film print can deliver.