Jump to content


Photo

TV Drama 2.39 Aspect ?


  • Please log in to reply
6 replies to this topic

#1 Felix Wiedemann

Felix Wiedemann
  • Basic Members
  • PipPip
  • 11 posts
  • Cinematographer
  • UK, Germany

Posted 05 January 2017 - 04:51 AM

Hello everybody,

 

Are there any US TV Dramas broadcast in 2.39 : 1 aspect ratio ?

 

I know 2 : 1 is becoming more popular, but are there any examples of 2.39 ?

 

Thank you very much !


  • 0

#2 Phil Connolly

Phil Connolly
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 335 posts
  • Director
  • London

Posted 05 January 2017 - 06:25 AM

Hey Felix

 

Netflix seems to be cooler with wider AR's as you say quite a lot of 2 :1 but I did spot that "Master of None" is 2.39:1

 

In the UK of course there's Utopia and Top Boy which I guess you've seen. 

 

Phil


  • 0

#3 Phil Rhodes

Phil Rhodes
  • Sustaining Members
  • 11470 posts
  • Other

Posted 05 January 2017 - 08:09 AM

Who's shooting scope for broadcast in the UK?

 

I'd have thought the BBC would have an aneurysm.

 

P


  • 0

#4 Phil Connolly

Phil Connolly
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 335 posts
  • Director
  • London

Posted 05 January 2017 - 08:16 AM

Who's shooting scope for broadcast in the UK?

 

I'd have thought the BBC would have an aneurysm.

 

P

Almost exclusively on Channel 4 - Top Boy was probably the first one, super 16 with 1.3X anamorphics. 

 

But channel 4 and Film Four have tended to use letterbox a lot for films anyway - far fewer films were pan and scanned. So that softens the audience to accept letter boxed TV drama programming. If they use it for films with minimal complaints then its fine for commissioned drama. 

 

Utopia looked great in scope: 


  • 0

#5 Mark Kenfield

Mark Kenfield
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 800 posts
  • Cinematographer
  • Australia/Wherever The Wind Takes Me

Posted 05 January 2017 - 09:46 AM

2:1 is okay, but the full 2.39:1 scope ratio seems kinda silly for any project that's destined purely for TV screening. It's just not making good use of the medium.
  • 0

#6 Phil Connolly

Phil Connolly
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 335 posts
  • Director
  • London

Posted 05 January 2017 - 10:21 AM

2:1 is okay, but the full 2.39:1 scope ratio seems kinda silly for any project that's destined purely for TV screening. It's just not making good use of the medium.

With the increasing number of common width cinema screens and the fact that with digital projection, scope film use fewer pixels then flat - you could make the same argument about use of scope in theatrical films. As my local multiplex the screen gets smaller for scope films. If we wanted to maximise screen real estate all films should be 1.9:1

 

I would argue that since TV screens are much bigger then they used to be, scope images can be effective.  Different aspect ratio's are a creative choice just as relevant for TV broadcast as it is for cinema. Personally I'd like to see more 2.39:1 telly programs - go do it Felix


  • 0

#7 Felix Wiedemann

Felix Wiedemann
  • Basic Members
  • PipPip
  • 11 posts
  • Cinematographer
  • UK, Germany

Posted 07 January 2017 - 07:05 AM

Thanks a lot Phil, very useful to know that 'Master of None' is 2.39 ! Will see if there are more examples.


  • 0


Ritter Battery

Quantum Music Works

Abel Cine

CineLab

Metropolis Post

CineTape

Pro 8mm

The Slider

Glidecam

Aerial Filmworks

rebotnix Technologies

Technodolly

Zylight

Paralinx LLC

Tai Audio

Willys Widgets

Visual Products

Rig Wheels Passport

FJS International, LLC

Broadcast Solutions Inc

Paralinx LLC

Zylight

Glidecam

Pro 8mm

rebotnix Technologies

The Slider

Aerial Filmworks

CineLab

Metropolis Post

Quantum Music Works

Rig Wheels Passport

Abel Cine

Tai Audio

FJS International, LLC

CineTape

Visual Products

Willys Widgets

Broadcast Solutions Inc

Technodolly

Ritter Battery