Jump to content


Photo

Optimo Style vs Optimo DP Rouge

Angenieux Optimo Style Rouge

  • Please log in to reply
3 replies to this topic

#1 Arben Thai

Arben Thai

    New

  • Basic Members
  • Pip
  • 6 posts

Posted 22 January 2017 - 09:47 AM

Hi, I was wondering has someone been using the Optimo Style series (16-40 & 30-76) from Angenieux and what would be difference or improvements in relation with the Optimo DP Rouge (16-42 & 30-80).


  • 0

#2 Dom Jaeger

Dom Jaeger
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1814 posts
  • Other
  • Melbourne, Australia

Posted 22 January 2017 - 08:10 PM

I know the DP Rouge lenses, but only got a brief chance to throw the similar range Style zooms up on my test projector and play with them a bit.

As far as I could tell the build and optical performance are very similar. The main advantage to the newer Style series is their compatibility with extenders, which can also help to increase their coverage for 6K. The normal rear protrusion also makes them compatible with film cameras and internal filter systems. They can be used with the servo module if that's the sort of work you do, and also easily swap to EF or Nikon mount.

The big advantage to the DPs would be the possibility of buying them much cheaper on the 2nd hand market.
  • 0

#3 Arben Thai

Arben Thai

    New

  • Basic Members
  • Pip
  • 6 posts

Posted 23 January 2017 - 02:43 PM

I can't decide on whether to buy two used Optimo DP Rouge (16-42 & 30-80) or the Optimo Style 16-40 with 2x Extender. Dom I have read your post regarding the Optimo DP and if there is no compromise on optical quality even with the 15-40mm like you mentioned I would have no doubt chosing the cheaper DP Rouges. But as far I see the big production would always chose the 15-40mm and the footage with the Rouge are often characterised with blown out skies, lost details etc. 

 
  • 0

#4 Dom Jaeger

Dom Jaeger
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1814 posts
  • Other
  • Melbourne, Australia

Posted 23 January 2017 - 10:12 PM

Are the lenses for your own use or do you want to rent to big production companies? Problems like blown out skies etc aren't due to the lenses..  :) 

 

Big productions will often use the highest end gear (like a 15-40) because it's what they're used to and the small advantages (slightly faster, slightly wider, slightly less aberrations, better mechanical durability) are worth it to them for the slightly higher rental. For a private operator, paying $50,000 instead of say $12,000 second hand for a slightly better lens doesn't make much sense.

 

But if you need the flexibility of extenders and different mounts, or think you need the latest lenses to maximise a rental return, then spending $17,000 on a Style 16-40 instead of $12,000 on a 2nd hand DP 16-42 might be worth it.


  • 0



Gamma Ray Digital Inc

Willys Widgets

Metropolis Post

Broadcast Solutions Inc

New Pro Video - New and Used Equipment

Aerial Filmworks

rebotnix Technologies

Glidecam

Rig Wheels Passport

Abel Cine

CineTape

Tai Audio

Visual Products

FJS International, LLC

Wooden Camera

Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS

Paralinx LLC

CineLab

The Slider

Technodolly

Ritter Battery

CineTape

Tai Audio

The Slider

Rig Wheels Passport

Broadcast Solutions Inc

Gamma Ray Digital Inc

Visual Products

Ritter Battery

Abel Cine

Wooden Camera

New Pro Video - New and Used Equipment

rebotnix Technologies

FJS International, LLC

Technodolly

Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS

Paralinx LLC

Metropolis Post

Aerial Filmworks

CineLab

Willys Widgets

Glidecam