Jump to content


Photo

Optimo Style vs Optimo DP Rouge

Angenieux Optimo Style Rouge

  • Please log in to reply
3 replies to this topic

#1 Arben Thai

Arben Thai

    New

  • Basic Members
  • Pip
  • 6 posts

Posted 22 January 2017 - 09:47 AM

Hi, I was wondering has someone been using the Optimo Style series (16-40 & 30-76) from Angenieux and what would be difference or improvements in relation with the Optimo DP Rouge (16-42 & 30-80).


  • 0


Support Cinematography.com and buy gear using our Amazon links!
PANASONIC LUMIX GH5 Body 4K Mirrorless Camera, 20.3 Megapixels, Dual I.S. 2.0, 4K 422 10-bit, Full Size HDMI Out, 3 Inch Touch LCD, DC-GH5KBODY (USA Black)

#2 Dom Jaeger

Dom Jaeger
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1407 posts
  • Other
  • Melbourne, Australia

Posted 22 January 2017 - 08:10 PM

I know the DP Rouge lenses, but only got a brief chance to throw the similar range Style zooms up on my test projector and play with them a bit.

As far as I could tell the build and optical performance are very similar. The main advantage to the newer Style series is their compatibility with extenders, which can also help to increase their coverage for 6K. The normal rear protrusion also makes them compatible with film cameras and internal filter systems. They can be used with the servo module if that's the sort of work you do, and also easily swap to EF or Nikon mount.

The big advantage to the DPs would be the possibility of buying them much cheaper on the 2nd hand market.
  • 0

#3 Arben Thai

Arben Thai

    New

  • Basic Members
  • Pip
  • 6 posts

Posted 23 January 2017 - 02:43 PM

I can't decide on whether to buy two used Optimo DP Rouge (16-42 & 30-80) or the Optimo Style 16-40 with 2x Extender. Dom I have read your post regarding the Optimo DP and if there is no compromise on optical quality even with the 15-40mm like you mentioned I would have no doubt chosing the cheaper DP Rouges. But as far I see the big production would always chose the 15-40mm and the footage with the Rouge are often characterised with blown out skies, lost details etc. 

 
  • 0

#4 Dom Jaeger

Dom Jaeger
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1407 posts
  • Other
  • Melbourne, Australia

Posted 23 January 2017 - 10:12 PM

Are the lenses for your own use or do you want to rent to big production companies? Problems like blown out skies etc aren't due to the lenses..  :) 

 

Big productions will often use the highest end gear (like a 15-40) because it's what they're used to and the small advantages (slightly faster, slightly wider, slightly less aberrations, better mechanical durability) are worth it to them for the slightly higher rental. For a private operator, paying $50,000 instead of say $12,000 second hand for a slightly better lens doesn't make much sense.

 

But if you need the flexibility of extenders and different mounts, or think you need the latest lenses to maximise a rental return, then spending $17,000 on a Style 16-40 instead of $12,000 on a 2nd hand DP 16-42 might be worth it.


  • 0




CineLab

Tai Audio

Visual Products

Ritter Battery

Paralinx LLC

CineTape

Gamma Ray Digital Inc

Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS

Willys Widgets

Rig Wheels Passport

Glidecam

The Slider

Broadcast Solutions Inc

rebotnix Technologies

Aerial Filmworks

Metropolis Post

Abel Cine

FJS International, LLC

Technodolly

Ritter Battery

Broadcast Solutions Inc

Visual Products

Rig Wheels Passport

Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS

Metropolis Post

Glidecam

Tai Audio

CineTape

Willys Widgets

The Slider

Technodolly

CineLab

Paralinx LLC

Gamma Ray Digital Inc

Abel Cine

rebotnix Technologies

FJS International, LLC

Aerial Filmworks