Jump to content


Photo

LED Company claims compared to Tungsten.

LED LED Tungsten

  • Please log in to reply
4 replies to this topic

#1 Alexander Sutton Hough

Alexander Sutton Hough
  • Basic Members
  • PipPip
  • 20 posts
  • Cinematographer
  • Los Angeles

Posted 05 February 2017 - 03:54 PM

HI, I have been doing a lot research into LED market and I am puzzled by how everyone and even the major lighting companies claim their light output compared to tungsten is so far off. For instance a common one I see is 100w(100w-135w) is a 1000w tungsten equivalent. From Arri all the way to the cheaper Aputure Lightstorms give a similar claim, but when you look at their photometrics and compare them they're more like a 300w tungsten equivalent.

 

I use Arri Photometric calculator to compare their classic 650w tungsten Fresnel to their own LED Fresnel series and everyone else's LEDs and it comes up consistently that around 100w LED is more like a 300w tungsten.   

Is there something I am missing or is this just false advertising across the whole lighting industry to push LED? I also took into account beam angle when comparing the photometrics.

 


  • 0


Support Cinematography.com and buy gear using our Amazon links!
PANASONIC LUMIX GH5 Body 4K Mirrorless Camera, 20.3 Megapixels, Dual I.S. 2.0, 4K 422 10-bit, Full Size HDMI Out, 3 Inch Touch LCD, DC-GH5KBODY (USA Black)

#2 Phil Rhodes

Phil Rhodes
  • Sustaining Members
  • 11780 posts
  • Other

Posted 05 February 2017 - 05:05 PM

Doesn't sound too far from the truth. Claims of 10:1 efficiency advantage are common. Reality is usually closer to 4:1.

 

It's not really a big enough market to expect much enforcement.

 

P


  • 0

#3 Akos Baranya

Akos Baranya
  • Basic Members
  • PipPip
  • 22 posts
  • Other
  • EU

Posted 06 February 2017 - 05:13 PM

They could maybe argue 10:1 equivalency if we are talking daylight color temp, because if you gel a 1K blue, you will get about the same amount of light as a 100W LED. Still misleading.


  • 0

#4 Edward Lawrence Conley III

Edward Lawrence Conley III
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 171 posts
  • Other
  • Los Angeles CA

Posted 07 February 2017 - 01:14 PM

Only thing Ive seen from Arri : The L5 is approximately 45% brighter than a 300 watt tungsten Fresnel, but only consumes 115 watts. When compared to the L7, the L5 is half the weight and size.

 

 

I think i read where the L10 is close to a 2k Tungsten.


  • 0

#5 Phil Rhodes

Phil Rhodes
  • Sustaining Members
  • 11780 posts
  • Other

Posted 07 February 2017 - 03:13 PM

Some of this is based on optical gains, whereby the LED doesn't emit into a sphere the way the tungsten halogen, or an HMI, very nearly does.


  • 0



Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: LED, LED Tungsten


Broadcast Solutions Inc

Tai Audio

Glidecam

CineLab

Visual Products

Metropolis Post

FJS International, LLC

Willys Widgets

Ritter Battery

Abel Cine

rebotnix Technologies

CineTape

Paralinx LLC

Technodolly

Rig Wheels Passport

Gamma Ray Digital Inc

Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS

The Slider

Aerial Filmworks

Ritter Battery

Aerial Filmworks

Tai Audio

CineLab

Glidecam

Metropolis Post

Broadcast Solutions Inc

Rig Wheels Passport

Technodolly

Abel Cine

rebotnix Technologies

FJS International, LLC

CineTape

Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS

Willys Widgets

Visual Products

The Slider

Paralinx LLC

Gamma Ray Digital Inc