Jump to content


Photo

Photochemical noise reduction - apparently it's a real thing


  • Please log in to reply
4 replies to this topic

#1 Karim D. Ghantous

Karim D. Ghantous
  • Basic Members
  • PipPip
  • 33 posts
  • Other
  • Melbourne, Australia

Posted 11 April 2017 - 05:45 PM

A photographer explains it briefly:

 

https://iftimestoods...before-after-2/

 

So, has anyone done this with movie film? If so, was it worth it?


  • 0


Support Cinematography.com and buy gear using our Amazon links!
PANASONIC LUMIX GH5 Body 4K Mirrorless Camera, 20.3 Megapixels, Dual I.S. 2.0, 4K 422 10-bit, Full Size HDMI Out, 3 Inch Touch LCD, DC-GH5KBODY (USA Black)

#2 Mark Dunn

Mark Dunn
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 2295 posts
  • Other
  • London

Posted 12 April 2017 - 06:13 AM

Coming from a stills background all I can think of is that this will cause slight overdevelopment, a speed push and possibly increase the contrast a bit. Rodinal is a fine-grain developer, but I doubt that the effect would survive standard development.

It's a non-starter for MP film because it is continuously processed. It can't escape agitation.

This is just development, followed by, er, development.

BTW it's not "lack of fixation" which bleaches the silver image, it's the bleach stage. The clue is in the name. The only time an image is left unfixed is in reversal development, after bleach and before re-exposure.


  • 0

#3 Robert Houllahan

Robert Houllahan
  • Sustaining Members
  • 1572 posts
  • Industry Rep
  • Providence R.I.

Posted 12 April 2017 - 08:39 PM

You can change the developer chemistry and strength to reduce grain, Brad has been doing some experiments with our Allen 35mm/16mm B&W machine to knock some grain down on XX22 and it seems to have worked, I can ask him what they changed tomorrow.


  • 0

#4 Chris Burke

Chris Burke
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1619 posts
  • Boston, MA

Posted 13 April 2017 - 05:38 AM

You can change the developer chemistry and strength to reduce grain, Brad has been doing some experiments with our Allen 35mm/16mm B&W machine to knock some grain down on XX22 and it seems to have worked, I can ask him what they changed tomorrow.

good to hear rob. Those interviews I told you I was going to shoot I will probably shoot B&W 7222.


  • 0

#5 Karim D. Ghantous

Karim D. Ghantous
  • Basic Members
  • PipPip
  • 33 posts
  • Other
  • Melbourne, Australia

Posted 13 April 2017 - 06:46 PM

Robert, that would be very helpful information. The photographer I cited uses 5222 in his film cameras.


  • 0



Technodolly

Paralinx LLC

FJS International, LLC

Quantum Music Works

Gamma Ray Digital Inc

Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS

Broadcast Solutions Inc

Aerial Filmworks

Ritter Battery

The Slider

Visual Products

CineTape

CineLab

Abel Cine

Tai Audio

Glidecam

Rig Wheels Passport

Lenser

Metropolis Post

Willys Widgets

rebotnix Technologies

CineLab

Lenser

Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS

rebotnix Technologies

Gamma Ray Digital Inc

Technodolly

Ritter Battery

Paralinx LLC

Aerial Filmworks

Abel Cine

Visual Products

Willys Widgets

Glidecam

FJS International, LLC

Tai Audio

CineTape

The Slider

Metropolis Post

Rig Wheels Passport

Broadcast Solutions Inc

Quantum Music Works