Jump to content


Photo

Photochemical noise reduction - apparently it's a real thing


  • Please log in to reply
4 replies to this topic

#1 Karim D. Ghantous

Karim D. Ghantous
  • Basic Members
  • PipPip
  • 32 posts
  • Other
  • Melbourne, Australia

Posted 11 April 2017 - 05:45 PM

A photographer explains it briefly:

 

https://iftimestoods...before-after-2/

 

So, has anyone done this with movie film? If so, was it worth it?


  • 0

#2 Mark Dunn

Mark Dunn
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 2270 posts
  • Other
  • London

Posted 12 April 2017 - 06:13 AM

Coming from a stills background all I can think of is that this will cause slight overdevelopment, a speed push and possibly increase the contrast a bit. Rodinal is a fine-grain developer, but I doubt that the effect would survive standard development.

It's a non-starter for MP film because it is continuously processed. It can't escape agitation.

This is just development, followed by, er, development.

BTW it's not "lack of fixation" which bleaches the silver image, it's the bleach stage. The clue is in the name. The only time an image is left unfixed is in reversal development, after bleach and before re-exposure.


  • 0

#3 Robert Houllahan

Robert Houllahan
  • Sustaining Members
  • 1567 posts
  • Industry Rep
  • Providence R.I.

Posted 12 April 2017 - 08:39 PM

You can change the developer chemistry and strength to reduce grain, Brad has been doing some experiments with our Allen 35mm/16mm B&W machine to knock some grain down on XX22 and it seems to have worked, I can ask him what they changed tomorrow.


  • 0

#4 Chris Burke

Chris Burke
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1595 posts
  • Boston, MA

Posted 13 April 2017 - 05:38 AM

You can change the developer chemistry and strength to reduce grain, Brad has been doing some experiments with our Allen 35mm/16mm B&W machine to knock some grain down on XX22 and it seems to have worked, I can ask him what they changed tomorrow.

good to hear rob. Those interviews I told you I was going to shoot I will probably shoot B&W 7222.


  • 0

#5 Karim D. Ghantous

Karim D. Ghantous
  • Basic Members
  • PipPip
  • 32 posts
  • Other
  • Melbourne, Australia

Posted 13 April 2017 - 06:46 PM

Robert, that would be very helpful information. The photographer I cited uses 5222 in his film cameras.


  • 0


Gamma Ray Digital Inc

Technodolly

Broadcast Solutions Inc

Quantum Music Works

CineLab

rebotnix Technologies

Visual Products

Glidecam

ZoomCrane

Pro 8mm

FJS International, LLC

Metropolis Post

CineTape

Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS

Paralinx LLC

Tai Audio

Willys Widgets

Ritter Battery

The Slider

Rig Wheels Passport

Aerial Filmworks

Abel Cine

Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS

Gamma Ray Digital Inc

CineTape

Technodolly

Abel Cine

Rig Wheels Passport

Ritter Battery

Broadcast Solutions Inc

Willys Widgets

Tai Audio

Metropolis Post

ZoomCrane

Quantum Music Works

CineLab

The Slider

Visual Products

Aerial Filmworks

rebotnix Technologies

Pro 8mm

Glidecam

FJS International, LLC

Paralinx LLC