Jump to content


Photo
  • Please log in to reply
13 replies to this topic

#1 Alexandros Angelopoulos Apostolos

Alexandros Angelopoulos Apostolos
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 420 posts
  • Student
  • Athens

Posted 05 October 2017 - 10:01 AM

Here is the first look at the second collaboration between Woody Allen and Vittorio Storaro:

 

 

It was posted yesterday. The film will premiere on 14 October 2017 at the New York Film Festival and will be available on 1 December in select theatres.

 

IndieWire has all the best shots and The Woody Allen Pages has a shot-by-shot breakdown.

 

It looks very candy-coloured, doesn't it? And not much unlike the last film even though the time periods are different. In fact, it seems like a continuation or a variation on a theme. People are already declaring it visually stunning and saying no wonder, since it's Storaro.


  • 0


#2 Mark Kenfield

Mark Kenfield
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1018 posts
  • Cinematographer
  • Australia/Wherever The Wind Takes Me

Posted 05 October 2017 - 04:48 PM

I think it looks marvellous from that trailer. Intriguing too, I'll be looking forward to this one.


  • 1

#3 Macks Fiiod

Macks Fiiod
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1088 posts
  • Director
  • Og from DC, Now in NJ

Posted 05 October 2017 - 10:39 PM

Great cast, great colors.


  • 1

#4 Tyler Purcell

Tyler Purcell
  • Sustaining Members
  • 3527 posts
  • Other
  • Los Angeles

Posted 06 October 2017 - 04:21 AM

Pretty, but the trailer doesn't really give us much insight to the movie. I have a feeling it's probably not very good. His last one was so/so, only really watched it due to liking the lead and wanting to see the F65 run by a 'film' guy. Looked really nice.
  • 0

#5 Alexandros Angelopoulos Apostolos

Alexandros Angelopoulos Apostolos
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 420 posts
  • Student
  • Athens

Posted Today, 12:27 PM

Well, the point was not the film; it was cinematography. You and I both no that there is a pretty good probability that the film won't be good – we have now become accustomed to think so given Allen's previous several films.

 

I've actually never posted about these films because of what they're about or anything like that. My main goal was to see the impressions about the cinematography of those movies, which I still think is a main purpose and goal of this whole forum and this particular subforum together with In Production.

 

At first I thought that Storaro went for diminishing the sharpness of this one compared to the last. In the trailer opening, is that diffusion, or whatever it is, a product of computer correction or on-camera filtering?

 

I'm a little surprised about how it looks – I expected it to be totally different, but at times it almost seems it's the same movie as the last one. In terms of cinematography.

 

I don't get it why is he so in love with that really powerful and overexposed backlight in hair. It's everywhere.


Edited by Alexandros Angelopoulos Apostolos, Today, 12:27 PM.

  • 0

#6 Alexandros Angelopoulos Apostolos

Alexandros Angelopoulos Apostolos
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 420 posts
  • Student
  • Athens

Posted Today, 12:32 PM

Here are two new clips new clip:

 

 


Edited by Alexandros Angelopoulos Apostolos, Today, 12:32 PM.

  • 0

#7 Alexandros Angelopoulos Apostolos

Alexandros Angelopoulos Apostolos
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 420 posts
  • Student
  • Athens

Posted Today, 12:39 PM

The first reviews are up, too.

 

Variety:

 

Woody Allen films now come in three essential flavors, or maybe it just comes down to three levels of quality. Once in a blue jasmine moon, he comes up with an enthralling act of high-wire inspiration, like “Match Point” or “Blue Jasmine,” that proves that he can still be as major as any filmmaker out there. Then there are the quaintly crafted, phoned-in mediocrities, like “Café Society” or “To Rome with Love,” where the jokes feel old and the situations older, like the Woody Allen version of paint by numbers. But then there are the middle-drawer Allen films that still percolate with energy and flair, like “Bullets Over Broadway” or “Vicky Cristina Barcelona.” They’re too baubly and calculated to be great, with each Woody trope locking into place, yet damned if they don’t hold you and even, in their way, add up to something (even if it’s ultimately something minor).
 
Wonder Wheel” is one of those movies.

 
The Guardian:
 

Don’t tell any of this to the Oscar-winning Apocalypse Now cinematographer Vittorio Storaro, who seems blissfully unaware of the film’s many failings, gracing it with an aesthetic so beautiful that it almost feels like a waste. Allen’s films have rarely been remembered for their visuals, but Storaro, who also gave Café Society an unmistakable sheen, does fantastic, awards-worthy work here. Each scene is carefully, lovingly composed and he takes great pleasure in lighting the actors, whether it be in golden sunlight, bleak off-season greys or a selection of woozily reflected neon lights. There’s also a surprisingly ambitious and vivid recreation of 1950s Coney Island and coupled with Storaro’s aesthetic, it’s frustrating that the practical craftsmanship of others isn’t supported by a script that brings the requisite heft to the table.
 
It’s by no means the worst of Allen’s later films (Cassandra’s Dream remains unrivaled in that department) and the flashes of brilliance from Winslet and stunning visuals do lift it but there’s an overwhelming, existential pointlessness to it all. Allen’s lazy unengaged script is the work of someone short on inspiration, so why is he still churning these films out? If competent is now considered a compliment for him then why is anyone still funding them? Like Winslet’s character, Allen is stuck in the past and Wonder Wheel is a crushing reminder of his present.

 
Vulture:
 

Did Allen ask his cinematographer, Vittorio Storaro, to pretend it was a Bertolucci movie? The colors are saturated, with oranges so intense that this film should have been called Tangerine. In Winslet’s big monologue, the lighting goes from normal to an orange bath to normal again, like in the theater. It’s lovely but over-the-top. So are Winslet’s last scenes. After Ginny’s good speech about “playing a waitress,” why didn’t Allen build on her insight into the difference between the roles she plays and her essence? How can she be a truly tragic character when she behaves in the end exactly the way we predict she will?

Edited by Alexandros Angelopoulos Apostolos, Today, 12:43 PM.

  • 0

#8 Alexandros Angelopoulos Apostolos

Alexandros Angelopoulos Apostolos
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 420 posts
  • Student
  • Athens

Posted Today, 12:44 PM

Vanity Fair – “Wonder Wheel Review: A Pretty Melodrama with a Woody Allen Problem – Though gorgeous to behold, the writer-director’s latest has some familiar issues.”:

 

I did say that there is a beautiful movie in there somewhere, though. And I think there is, if Santo Loquasto’s gorgeous production design and Vittorio Storaro’s lush cinematography had been employed in service of a better script. Wonder Wheel’s careful compositions, saturated in shifting primary hues, really are lovely. They lend the film its only real poetry, evoking an emotionally alluring mood piece that might have been, had someone other than Allen made the rest of the movie. Maybe Loquasto, Storaro, and Winslet could isolate their work and shop it around to some theater companies. I’d be eager to see what they could come up with together, when they’re not stuck on Allen’s wheel—turning and turning, never getting anywhere

 


Edited by Alexandros Angelopoulos Apostolos, Today, 12:46 PM.

  • 0

#9 Alexandros Angelopoulos Apostolos

Alexandros Angelopoulos Apostolos
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 420 posts
  • Student
  • Athens

Posted Today, 12:46 PM

The Huffington Post has a brutal title: Surprise, Surprise: Woody Allen Made Another Lousy Movie:

 

“Wonder Wheel” is further enhanced by cinematographer Vittorio Storaro, who also gave Allen’s “Café Society” a sun-speckled elegance. Here, Storaro frames Coney Island with lush nostalgia. When things are going swell for Ginny and Mickey, the sunny sky’s blue hues glisten against pearly clouds. When events turn dreary, the gray of the rain crackles, as if disappointment is drizzling on the characters. In other words, Storaro does Allen’s work for him.


Edited by Alexandros Angelopoulos Apostolos, Today, 12:49 PM.

  • 0

#10 Alexandros Angelopoulos Apostolos

Alexandros Angelopoulos Apostolos
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 420 posts
  • Student
  • Athens

Posted Today, 12:49 PM

But forget the reviews. As usual, you have to see it for yourself. If nothing, we'll all enjoy dissecting the cinematography, whether we end up loving it or not. Blade Runner 2049 is loved by critics, but the movie is terrible.


  • 0

#11 Brian Drysdale

Brian Drysdale
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 5025 posts
  • Cinematographer

Posted Today, 01:35 PM

I suspect like many of the more interesting films  "Blade Runner 2049" divides opinion, However, to say it's terrible means that you haven't seen any truly terrible films.


  • 0

#12 Alexandros Angelopoulos Apostolos

Alexandros Angelopoulos Apostolos
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 420 posts
  • Student
  • Athens

Posted Today, 01:57 PM

I was just waiting for someone to come and tell me that. And voilà, here you are. :)


  • 0

#13 Brian Drysdale

Brian Drysdale
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 5025 posts
  • Cinematographer

Posted Today, 02:58 PM

You haven't justified your terrible argument position. All these things are subjective, but terrible is a level way below the Blade Runner film. I've heard people have walked out, but people also walk out of Godard and Werner Herzog films, but these aren't usually called terrible films. 

 

Perhaps not what you were expecting is a better description or not your thing.


  • 0

#14 Alexandros Angelopoulos Apostolos

Alexandros Angelopoulos Apostolos
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 420 posts
  • Student
  • Athens

Posted Today, 04:13 PM

Vittorio Storaro and Edward Lachman held a masterclass at the 55th New York Film Festival. Here is some of what they talked about:

 

http://filmmakermaga...ro-at-the-nyff/

 

For those of you who know Italian, here is more:

 

http://www.lavocedin...ica-di-ferrara/


  • 0



Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: Woody Allen, Vittorio Storaro, Anthony Raffaele, Sony CineAlta F65, Sony CineAlta PMW-F55, Cooke S4, Angenieux Optimo

Aerial Filmworks

Tai Audio

Gamma Ray Digital Inc

Paralinx LLC

Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS

FJS International, LLC

Technodolly

Willys Widgets

Glidecam

Ritter Battery

Abel Cine

Broadcast Solutions Inc

Visual Products

Metropolis Post

Wooden Camera

The Slider

rebotnix Technologies

Rig Wheels Passport

CineLab

CineTape

Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS

Tai Audio

Ritter Battery

Metropolis Post

Rig Wheels Passport

Gamma Ray Digital Inc

Abel Cine

The Slider

Visual Products

Glidecam

rebotnix Technologies

Aerial Filmworks

CineTape

Broadcast Solutions Inc

Paralinx LLC

Technodolly

CineLab

Wooden Camera

Willys Widgets

FJS International, LLC