Jump to content


Photo

Kodak's New Super 8 Camera Update


  • Please log in to reply
41 replies to this topic

#1 Samuel Berger

Samuel Berger
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 634 posts
  • Cinematographer
  • Seattle

Posted 01 December 2017 - 05:49 PM

https://www.kodak.co...ntid=4295004933

 

Looks like it's going to be a bit more expensive than they thought, at $2500-$3000. Not a good move.

 

 

The KODAK Super 8 Camera and processing ecosystem will be available in 2018 for approximately $2500-$3000.

P.S. If you'll be at CES 2018 in Las Vegas, Nevada, stop by the Kodak Booth #20612 in South Hall Tech East to see a working prototype of the camera and get a demo of the KODAK Darkroom, your soon-to-be online destination for Super 8 storytelling.

 

The one thing I find innovative is that you can record sound with it. I'm very interested in how they will be synching the sound from the SD card to the actual film.

 

It's very unfortunate that they are not taking projectors into consideration, nor developing new projectors.


Edited by Samuel Berger, 01 December 2017 - 05:55 PM.

  • 0

#2 tom lombard

tom lombard
  • Basic Members
  • PipPip
  • 86 posts
  • Other
  • nebraska

Posted 01 December 2017 - 07:33 PM

I got the email as well but I'm really concerned for Kodak and wondering if that camera & "processing ecosystem" will ever be a reality.  I've been unable to buy film off of their website for a couple of weeks now.  I've got plenty of D50 16mm for a project but wanted to pick up some S8mm to try out a loaner Bauer and all I'm getting is server errors.  Not a real temp. issue as their online store has been this way for several weeks now  http://store.kodak.c...goryID.70237500


  • 0

#3 Macks Fiiod

Macks Fiiod
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1160 posts
  • Director
  • Og from DC, Now in NJ

Posted 01 December 2017 - 07:37 PM

I thought it was going to retail for only like $400? Would anyone who already owns film cameras want this thing at that price point?

 

Was under the assumption it was made to be something to get newer digital shooters familiar with film cameras, at 3 grand I really have no interest.


  • 0

#4 Samuel Berger

Samuel Berger
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 634 posts
  • Cinematographer
  • Seattle

Posted 01 December 2017 - 07:57 PM

I thought it was going to retail for only like $400? Would anyone who already owns film cameras want this thing at that price point?

 

Was under the assumption it was made to be something to get newer digital shooters familiar with film cameras, at 3 grand I really have no interest.

 

People paying that much at launch will feel stabbed in the back when the price inevitably goes down.

It would be better for them to take a loss and make the product popular than to try to be the Apple of film by overpricing themselves squarely inside the hipster market.

 

I will still want it if it has the Logmar's pin registration system and pressure plate. That is the only true improvement that can make Super 8 a professional use format. Otherwise there is still no advantage to it and I'll continue to use my ZC-1000.

 

Tom, I hear the 50D carts have been sold out for some time. I bought mine from eBay instead.


  • 0

#5 Macks Fiiod

Macks Fiiod
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1160 posts
  • Director
  • Og from DC, Now in NJ

Posted 01 December 2017 - 08:36 PM

Now if they put out a 16MM camera in a nice user-friendly body I'd be interested at that price point.


  • 0

#6 Robin Phillips

Robin Phillips
  • Basic Members
  • PipPip
  • 19 posts
  • Director
  • Los Angeles / San Francisco

Posted 01 December 2017 - 08:40 PM

Im sure kodak doesnt want to anger fotokem, but I feel like a bigger thing for them would be offering process paid service on 16mm, maybe even 35 as a way to expand the market for motion picture film.

Sadly even with the Max8 gate (or larger?) this thing has, for the price point Im gonna just shoot 16. Heck, a 16mm cartridge camera would have made more sense than this thing...

 

Im really afraid this camera's price point is smack in that digital bolex price dead zone - too expensive for a point of entry for many people, but lacking things any professional might want. Which means it'll sell out right when they declare they're discontinuing it...

 

that all being said I still kinda want one. just annoying that its gonna cost more than my SR3 cost me


  • 0

#7 tom lombard

tom lombard
  • Basic Members
  • PipPip
  • 86 posts
  • Other
  • nebraska

Posted 01 December 2017 - 08:47 PM

 

People paying that much at launch will feel stabbed in the back when the price inevitably goes down.

It would be better for them to take a loss and make the product popular than to try to be the Apple of film by overpricing themselves squarely inside the hipster market.

 

I will still want it if it has the Logmar's pin registration system and pressure plate. That is the only true improvement that can make Super 8 a professional use format. Otherwise there is still no advantage to it and I'll continue to use my ZC-1000.

 

Tom, I hear the 50D carts have been sold out for some time. I bought mine from eBay instead.

 

 

This doesn't appear to be an issue of them being sold out.  Up until about 3 weeks ago, you could see all of the S8, 16, & 35 mm offerings but some would indicate availability for order & some would not but that would vary over time.  Their online store has just been a server error for several weeks now.  If it were an issue with their web pages, they'd have it fixed within 24 hours.


  • 0

#8 Anthony Schilling

Anthony Schilling
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1053 posts
  • Camera Operator
  • Portland, OR

Posted 02 December 2017 - 11:30 AM

They have done a fine job of erasing my hopes of ever owning this camera. For $3K I need a new shed or concrete patio. I originally thought they would mass produce the R&D already in place by Logmar, as a way of bringing down the price tag that drove everyone off the field... and only s 30 units. But it's the same thing all over again. A new camera hyped and anticipated while the R&D costs slowly raise the price tag beyond what's feasible to the target user. 


  • 0

#9 Samuel Berger

Samuel Berger
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 634 posts
  • Cinematographer
  • Seattle

Posted 02 December 2017 - 04:30 PM

Here is some Logmar footage:

 

 

 

The first one is cleaner, but that is why I feel some folks will still go for the new Kodak camera. I don't like the new high price which much higher than the originally proposed $750 but in the end they are proposing a more professional means of film acquisition. That first video, had it not been for the dirt on the gate, would have been indistinguishable from S16. This from a small camcorder shaped camera that is easily concealed and taken possibly anywhere and captures sound.

 

It's really overpriced for its market but it's also a game-changer. That's the trade-off. I just hope this isn't the death of Super 8 instead of its revival, because other than myself I don't know a single Super 8 enthusiast who will buy this.

 

Edit: second video doesn't embed, has to be seen on Vimeo.


Edited by Samuel Berger, 02 December 2017 - 04:31 PM.

  • 0

#10 Macks Fiiod

Macks Fiiod
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1160 posts
  • Director
  • Og from DC, Now in NJ

Posted 02 December 2017 - 06:13 PM

How does this look so incredibly clean? Is it just that most Youtube videos are using old expired stock they found in their basement?


  • 0

#11 Samuel Berger

Samuel Berger
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 634 posts
  • Cinematographer
  • Seattle

Posted 02 December 2017 - 06:19 PM

How does this look so incredibly clean? Is it just that most Youtube videos are using old expired stock they found in their basement?

 

Pressure-plate + pin registration + 50D low grain film + Gamma Ray Digital 2K scan.

 

Ive been looking at pictures of the Super 8 camera prototype by Kodak and it looks like it will NOT have the same internal movement as the Logmar. If this is true I'm not buying it.


  • 0

#12 Anthony Schilling

Anthony Schilling
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1053 posts
  • Camera Operator
  • Portland, OR

Posted 03 December 2017 - 05:38 PM

 

 

Ive been looking at pictures of the Super 8 camera prototype by Kodak and it looks like it will NOT have the same internal movement as the Logmar. If this is true I'm not buying it.

It does not have the same gate which pulls the film out of the cart, they did mention that a lot of the R&D has gone into improving the gate system and claim it's paying off. I expect the registration will be good.  


  • 0

#13 Samuel Berger

Samuel Berger
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 634 posts
  • Cinematographer
  • Seattle

Posted 03 December 2017 - 05:52 PM

It does not have the same gate which pulls the film out of the cart, they did mention that a lot of the R&D has gone into improving the gate system and claim it's paying off. I expect the registration will be good.  

 

$3000 good?


  • 0

#14 Simon Wyss

Simon Wyss
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1405 posts
  • Other
  • Basel, Switzerland

Posted 04 December 2017 - 08:42 AM

The right direction of a price correction would have been from $2,000 to $600.

You still deal with that darn stupid, idiotic, cybernetics-from-hour-one cartridge.


  • 0

#15 Scott Pickering

Scott Pickering
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 159 posts
  • Other

Posted 04 December 2017 - 12:58 PM

I have too many Super 8 cameras to bother considering the new one, but its steadiness looks interesting. That Logmar video is the best Super 8 footage I've ever seen. Sharp as ever, and you can even see the fine detail in the grass, bricks on house, etc. Gives 16mm a run for its money.


  • 0

#16 Samuel Berger

Samuel Berger
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 634 posts
  • Cinematographer
  • Seattle

Posted 04 December 2017 - 01:10 PM

I have too many Super 8 cameras to bother considering the new one, but its steadiness looks interesting. That Logmar video is the best Super 8 footage I've ever seen. Sharp as ever, and you can even see the fine detail in the grass, bricks on house, etc. Gives 16mm a run for its money.

 

But that level isn't attainable without proper registration and pressure plate. And as good as it looks, it would look different on a projector due to the sprocket hole flying around in the frame. Not to mention that you can't watch projected negative film.

I'm glad to see Ektachrome coming back, I just wish the camera had the Logmar registration system.


  • 0

#17 Will Montgomery

Will Montgomery
  • Sustaining Members
  • 2030 posts
  • Producer
  • Dallas, TX

Posted 05 December 2017 - 03:48 PM

I'm more interested in their processing & transfer system. If they can keep that reasonable I will shoot more Super 8. Right now I'd rather shoot 16mm since the transfer costs me about the same anyway.

 

As far as the $2500 price point, it is high compared to all the used cameras we have but with good DSLRs costing $3000+ and the best Super 8 cameras back in the day costing a similar amount its really not out of the ballpark. They may not sell a ton of them but its not unreasonable for what's involved with making them.

 

But if they wanted a hipster film revolution boost they need to get that down to $500 or so.


  • 0

#18 Samuel Berger

Samuel Berger
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 634 posts
  • Cinematographer
  • Seattle

Posted 05 December 2017 - 04:34 PM

Good points, Will. I am hoping, if the new camera doesn't live up to their sales expectations, that at least the "ecosystem" they are proposing won't be discarded with it.

 

In the past, offering processing had led to monopoly issues but this isn't the case today.

 

If anything, it will get people to use their old cameras more. I just hope that this doesn't cause a camera price hike. If it does...well, I have plenty of them hoarded already. ;-)  But it's unlikely.


  • 0

#19 Dom Jaeger

Dom Jaeger
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1599 posts
  • Other
  • Melbourne, Australia

Posted 05 December 2017 - 06:17 PM

But that level isn't attainable without proper registration and pressure plate. And as good as it looks, it would look different on a projector due to the sprocket hole flying around in the frame. Not to mention that you can't watch projected negative film.
I'm glad to see Ektachrome coming back, I just wish the camera had the Logmar registration system.


Why do you want the Logmar registration system? If you want steady and fine detailed film images, the same money will get you an Arri or Aaton 16mm camera that will be way way better, and quiet to boot. And the cost of film, processing and transfer isn't much more.

The only real advantages to S8 are ease of use and cheap cameras, and the charm of the medium itself. I never saw the point of the Logmar camera to be honest. If you want the small format look with best quality, get a Bolex H8. Or shoot S16 and crop a little window out of the middle of it. ;)
  • 2

#20 Samuel Berger

Samuel Berger
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 634 posts
  • Cinematographer
  • Seattle

Posted 05 December 2017 - 06:27 PM

Dom, for a second I thought it was Simon Wyss who was posting. :D

 

I have enough 16mm camera packages, I just want to see film stay alive. The reality is that most people who are tangentially attracted to film will try Super 8 for ease of use. When I was 8 I didn't want an SLR because I thought threading the film would be too difficult and so kept using a very silly Instamatic that shot 126 Kodak cartridges. Too many adults will feel the same about 16mm.

 

There are thousands of inexpensive cameras out there, and projectors. People thinking of trying film for the first time are much more likely to snap up an Elmo For $8 than an Arri or Aaton for $3000.

 

If Super 8 dies, film could very well die with it because you lose that cheap, accessible entryway into the world of celluloid.


  • 0


FJS International, LLC

Abel Cine

Opal

Tai Audio

Metropolis Post

Paralinx LLC

Aerial Filmworks

Gamma Ray Digital Inc

Visual Products

Glidecam

Technodolly

Ritter Battery

Willys Widgets

CineLab

CineTape

The Slider

Broadcast Solutions Inc

Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS

Wooden Camera

rebotnix Technologies

Rig Wheels Passport

Opal

Rig Wheels Passport

CineTape

rebotnix Technologies

The Slider

Tai Audio

Ritter Battery

Aerial Filmworks

Abel Cine

Gamma Ray Digital Inc

Metropolis Post

Glidecam

Wooden Camera

Broadcast Solutions Inc

Paralinx LLC

Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS

FJS International, LLC

Visual Products

Willys Widgets

Technodolly

CineLab