Jump to content


Photo

Premiere DigiBetacam Models?


  • Please log in to reply
10 replies to this topic

#1 Macks Fiiod

Macks Fiiod
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1424 posts
  • Director
  • Og from DC, Now in NJ

Posted 17 May 2018 - 03:57 PM

I see a lot of Sony DVW-709WS, DVW-790WS, stuff, but I'm assuming those were budget models?

 

I need the minds of the industry veterans here! Stuff major networks were using.

 

Thanks.


  • 0

#2 Tyler Purcell

Tyler Purcell
  • Sustaining Members
  • 4155 posts
  • Other
  • Los Angeles

Posted 17 May 2018 - 04:27 PM

The 790WS was the "premiere" all-in-one model. 


  • 0

#3 Phil Rhodes

Phil Rhodes
  • Sustaining Members
  • 12229 posts
  • Other

Posted 17 May 2018 - 07:07 PM

The was a DVW-970 which could do progressive scan. There was an option board to produce 3:2 pulldown on NTSC models. I'm not sure how this was handled on the PAL version but I suspect it was just shot and recorded at 25.

The 790 was the archetypal version, though. Seen and used everywhere, on everything, right up to the high end.
  • 0

#4 Robin R Probyn

Robin R Probyn
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 2277 posts
  • Cinematographer
  • Tokyo

Posted 17 May 2018 - 07:21 PM

Great camera.. the earlier digibeta,s (700) I think from memory.. had a 4-3 sensor and VF and would crop for 16-9.. which was just coming in.. the 790 and 709 the big improvement was a 16-9 sensor /VF that cropped to 4-3.. used mine for 15 years.. paid for my house.. and was the industry work horse for just about everything.. before HD camer along.. I even got £1,500 trade in for it.. on my f5 in the UK..(any pro Sony camera ).. I phoned to check if my digibeta ( gathering dust under the bed) counted.. and they said yes !..  it served me well.. 


Edited by Robin R Probyn, 17 May 2018 - 07:22 PM.

  • 0

#5 Stuart Brereton

Stuart Brereton
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 3364 posts
  • Cinematographer
  • Los Angeles

Posted 17 May 2018 - 08:37 PM

I used to shoot all the time with DigiBeta, mostly 790 WS. It was the workhorse camera in Britain for a long time, and a lot of the big TV shows used it. Nice cameras, but long in the tooth now, and only standard def.


  • 0

#6 Robin R Probyn

Robin R Probyn
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 2277 posts
  • Cinematographer
  • Tokyo

Posted 18 May 2018 - 03:09 AM

Im pretty sure they had the first color VF too as an option .. remember having a lend of one.. but was a total eye ball melter and cost a fortune .. but it did exist ..


  • 0

#7 Phil Connolly

Phil Connolly
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 458 posts
  • Director
  • London

Posted 22 May 2018 - 02:48 PM

I did a short film on the PAL DVW-970 it looked surprisingly good, progressive scan - recorded using PsF so just split across 2 fields on the tape. 

 

We ran it through a Snell and Willcox upconveter for a screening at the BFI. It held up really well, it could give the first generation Panasonic HD Varicam a run for its money. 

 

In the UK most channels demanded Digi-Beta origination and these cameras cost in the $30-40k bracket and now you can get sub $5000 cameras that meet broadcast specs...fun times. When I was cutting my teeth on miniDV, I was always trying to seek out opportunities to shoot on digibeta - I normally ended up compromising on the loverly Sony DSR570WSP - the DVCAM workhorse of the digital indie film crowd. Thats the one in my profile pic - 1/4 black pro-mist and de-interlace in post and try to convince yourself its film


  • 0

#8 Brian Drysdale

Brian Drysdale
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 5217 posts
  • Cinematographer

Posted 22 May 2018 - 04:30 PM

A pity that the DVW-970 arrived too late, an editor friend said that on SD. it looked better than material shot on a F900 and then converted to SD.


  • 0

#9 Phil Connolly

Phil Connolly
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 458 posts
  • Director
  • London

Posted 25 May 2018 - 03:35 AM

A pity that the DVW-970 arrived too late, an editor friend said that on SD. it looked better than material shot on a F900 and then converted to SD.

 

I'd believe that wasn't the F900 only 3:1:1 colour sampling at 8bit. So digibeta's 4:2:2 10 bit is going to beat HDCAM in everything but resolution.  


  • 0

#10 Brian Drysdale

Brian Drysdale
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 5217 posts
  • Cinematographer

Posted 25 May 2018 - 03:42 AM

Indeed it was, that's why it was a pity that it didn't come out sooner, rather than when SD was pretty much on the way out in the UK..


  • 0

#11 Michael Rodin

Michael Rodin
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 258 posts
  • Cinematographer
  • Moscow

Posted 25 May 2018 - 08:59 AM

Ikegami HL59 had a better camera head than 970, with very solid color science, surpassed only by D-Cinema cameras like F35 years later, but no progressive scan, of course.


  • 0


Abel Cine

rebotnix Technologies

Visual Products

Technodolly

Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS

Willys Widgets

Gamma Ray Digital Inc

CineLab

Broadcast Solutions Inc

Rig Wheels Passport

Paralinx LLC

Glidecam

FJS International, LLC

CineTape

Tai Audio

Aerial Filmworks

New Pro Video - New and Used Equipment

Metropolis Post

Ritter Battery

Wooden Camera

The Slider

Willys Widgets

Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS

Technodolly

The Slider

New Pro Video - New and Used Equipment

Gamma Ray Digital Inc

Abel Cine

Rig Wheels Passport

CineLab

CineTape

Broadcast Solutions Inc

Metropolis Post

rebotnix Technologies

Aerial Filmworks

Tai Audio

Glidecam

Wooden Camera

FJS International, LLC

Paralinx LLC

Ritter Battery

Visual Products