Jump to content


Photo

A7III or GH5S ?


  • Please log in to reply
3 replies to this topic

#1 Eric Soto

Eric Soto
  • Basic Members
  • PipPip
  • 68 posts
  • Other
  • Toronto

Posted 18 May 2018 - 05:54 PM

Hey everyone, I am looking to upgrade from my 5dmrk3. I am currently indecisive on whether I should go with the A73 or the new GH5s. The reasons I want to go with the a73 is that I won't have to change any of my lenses, aside from an adapter that I would have to get. This at the same time presents a possible problem in that, I will be using this camera on a gimbal from time to time, and I've read that most adapters don't support auto focus. The reason for going with the GH5s is the 10 bit 4:2:2 capture. My problem is that I don't know if the benefits of the GH5s are worth the trouble of selling my lenses and switching to M4/3 lenses. Although I notice the benefits of 10 bit,and I would prefer it ,being in the lower budget projects, and being on a budget, I'm not sure my clients will notice theses differences.

Any experience you guys may have with these cameras would be great to hear about, as this is a big purchase for me, I want to make sure its the right camera that will last a while.

 

Thank You

 

Eric S.

 


  • 0

#2 Robin R Probyn

Robin R Probyn
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 2348 posts
  • Cinematographer
  • Tokyo

Posted 18 May 2018 - 08:29 PM

I dont think 8 bit is the end of the world ..depending on your post demands.. we have all become a bit obsessed with pixel peeking and manufactures marketing babble.. it was only a few years ago that 8 bit 50 Mbps Long GOP was the highest standard and huge budget programs were made this way without audiences being up in arms about it not being 10bit 4K 300 Mbps.. and storming the gates of the BBC.. baying for blood.. plus everyone is watching on iPhones anyway.. :)


  • 0

#3 Eric Soto

Eric Soto
  • Basic Members
  • PipPip
  • 68 posts
  • Other
  • Toronto

Posted 22 May 2018 - 08:04 PM

I dont think 8 bit is the end of the world ..depending on your post demands.. we have all become a bit obsessed with pixel peeking and manufactures marketing babble.. it was only a few years ago that 8 bit 50 Mbps Long GOP was the highest standard and huge budget programs were made this way without audiences being up in arms about it not being 10bit 4K 300 Mbps.. and storming the gates of the BBC.. baying for blood.. plus everyone is watching on iPhones anyway.. :)

Yea, thats what I was thinking as well. Thank you for the reply


  • 0

#4 Robin R Probyn

Robin R Probyn
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 2348 posts
  • Cinematographer
  • Tokyo

Posted 22 May 2018 - 09:26 PM

Depends hugely on your needs ..Broadcast or not..(Ive had Natgeo say no to XAVC S but other times Ive used my a6300 as an interview B camera for broadcast shows).. but if you need log 10 bit..422 as a client requirement .. I would think its better to get an actual video camera ..

 

I was just speaking generally but of course the best thing is to shoot test footage.. and be sure of your client codec requirements ..


  • 0


Wooden Camera

Rig Wheels Passport

The Slider

New Pro Video - New and Used Equipment

FJS International, LLC

Glidecam

CineTape

Ritter Battery

Abel Cine

Technodolly

Aerial Filmworks

Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS

Tai Audio

Gamma Ray Digital Inc

rebotnix Technologies

Willys Widgets

CineLab

Broadcast Solutions Inc

Metropolis Post

Paralinx LLC

Visual Products

Willys Widgets

Glidecam

Tai Audio

rebotnix Technologies

FJS International, LLC

Ritter Battery

Abel Cine

Visual Products

Wooden Camera

Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS

Broadcast Solutions Inc

Aerial Filmworks

CineTape

Gamma Ray Digital Inc

New Pro Video - New and Used Equipment

The Slider

Technodolly

CineLab

Metropolis Post

Rig Wheels Passport

Paralinx LLC