Jump to content


Photo

S16 to Digibeta to MiniDV


  • Please log in to reply
8 replies to this topic

#1 Sol Train Saihati

Sol Train Saihati
  • Basic Members
  • PipPip
  • 96 posts
  • Gaffer
  • London

Posted 13 August 2005 - 11:53 AM

If I have learned one thing, it's stay away from S16 transfers to MiniDV, the results for me are often appalingly grainy and its seems to take the life out of the film. These stills are the raw stills from a number of different stocks both Kodak and Fuji, ungraded. I'll post up the stop and stock details when I get a minute to find the report sheets.

Attached Images

  • Flectere_Rushes_VR_1_Still_4.jpg
  • Flectere_Rushes_VR_1_Still_6.jpg
  • Flectere_Rushes_VR_2_Still_11.jpg

Edited by djdumpy, 13 August 2005 - 12:01 PM.

  • 0

#2 Sol Train Saihati

Sol Train Saihati
  • Basic Members
  • PipPip
  • 96 posts
  • Gaffer
  • London

Posted 13 August 2005 - 11:55 AM

A few more...

Attached Images

  • Flectere_Rushes_VR_2_Still_12.jpg
  • Flectere_Rushes_VR_2_Still_13.jpg

  • 0

#3 Sol Train Saihati

Sol Train Saihati
  • Basic Members
  • PipPip
  • 96 posts
  • Gaffer
  • London

Posted 13 August 2005 - 11:58 AM

a few more... I'll try and post up the digibeta transfers to compare if I can get hold of them.

Attached Images

  • Flectere_Rushes_VR_2_Still_15.jpg
  • Flectere_Rushes_VR_2_Still_17.jpg

  • 0

#4 Phil Rhodes

Phil Rhodes
  • Sustaining Members
  • 11936 posts
  • Other

Posted 13 August 2005 - 06:35 PM

Hi,

I've had mediocre results with this chain too, but the problem was softness, not grain. Grain would be softened by repeated compression, unless it was provoking mosquito noise, and that isn't mosquito noise - although it's hard to be sure without seeing it moving. I guess it was at least somewhat grainy on the digi?

Check that it was dubbed properly. Many houses write off anything less than digibeta as a "rushes" or low-end format and you can get some horrible composite dubs if you're not careful. That said, what you have there doesn't look like that's the problem, either. It just looks like a rather sharp, slightly grainy transfer.

Phil
  • 0

#5 Stephen Williams

Stephen Williams
  • Sustaining Members
  • 4708 posts
  • Cinematographer
  • Europe

Posted 14 August 2005 - 04:37 AM

Check that it was dubbed properly. Many houses write off anything less than digibeta as a "rushes" or low-end format and you can get some horrible composite dubs if you're not careful. That said, what you have there doesn't look like that's the problem, either. It just looks like a rather sharp, slightly grainy transfer.

Phil

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>



Phil,

I think the problem is that most (all?) mini dv recorders don't have an sdi or YUV in, just composite or firewire. I always ask when dubbing to put a mini DV tape in to the DVCAM machine. I can play that back in my Sony Camcorder .I am always told that it won't work, it always does and the quality is fantastic!

Stephen Williams DP

www.stephenw.com
  • 0

#6 Phil Rhodes

Phil Rhodes
  • Sustaining Members
  • 11936 posts
  • Other

Posted 14 August 2005 - 04:47 AM

Hi,

> I think the problem is that most (all?) mini dv recorders don't have an sdi or YUV in

All DVCAM decks from the DSR-45 up have component inputs, many with SDI as an option. The cheapest possible SDI device is actually a DSR-70, the portable edit station, with the SDI board in it. Regardless of that, DV over firewire is a digital component format and I would expect this to be used in lieu of anything else if that's all the deck had, and I really don't care what the post house's political opinion is of a type of connector. At the prices they charge I believe I am entitled to the best results.

> I am always told that it won't work, it always does and the quality is fantastic!

Been there... a lot of Sony miniDV stuff will play DVCAM. Again, one would expect these very highly paid post places to know this!

Phil
  • 0

#7 Stephen Williams

Stephen Williams
  • Sustaining Members
  • 4708 posts
  • Cinematographer
  • Europe

Posted 14 August 2005 - 07:08 AM

many with SDI as an option. The cheapest possible SDI device is actually a DSR-70, the portable edit station, with the SDI board in it.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>


Hi,

Its the SDI input option on the Mini DV they don't want! Then its just too easy to shoot on film, edit on a laptop and firewire out. I often use this workflow, I can Shoot 35mm edit on a laptop for the same price as shooting DigiBeta and editing at a facilities company! Unless I have any blue screen's or heavy compositing it works for me!

Just my 2c

Stephen
  • 0

#8 Andy Sparaco SOC

Andy Sparaco SOC
  • Sustaining Members
  • 203 posts
  • Cinematographer
  • Chicago and most airline lounges

Posted 09 October 2005 - 03:41 PM

Super 16 to DV25 via dubbing Digibeta has always looked very good for us. We always use top quality Xfer and Dubbing Houses. Problems occur once the edit begins for doing graphics/SFX's and compositing. You can't edit a short export out for "treatment" and then slug it back in to your timeline. You have to act on the "orginal" file. Every "CoDec" Cycle kicks the hell out of DV25.

Thats why D-1 and DVpro50 are better overall choices they can tolerate multiple generations better.

DV25 though is an excellent Offline format and I use it to edit on the fly on a 17" laptop in planes, trains and automobiles
  • 0

#9 Tim Carroll

Tim Carroll
  • Sustaining Members
  • 2165 posts
  • Other
  • Chicago, Illinois

Posted 09 October 2005 - 05:46 PM

I do find this all confusing. We shoot regular 16mm and transfer to DVCAM, using the mini DVCAM tapes Sony makes, and our results look much better than what you have posted. And we have it done on a Rank, not even a Spirit.

I was always under the impression that miniDV and DVCAM were both DV25 compression and color space, the only difference between the two was the tape speed. That being the case, the house that does our work, charges quite a bit more to do the transfer to miniDVCAM than it would to do the transfer to miniDV. It may have to do with them using a much better deck and there is a deck charge, not sure. No one there seems to be able to give me a good reason for the increase in cost. But we always go with the DVCAM transfer because of the robustness of the tape and it's "archivability" B)

Tim Carroll
  • 0


CineLab

Metropolis Post

Wooden Camera

Aerial Filmworks

FJS International, LLC

Willys Widgets

Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS

Ritter Battery

CineTape

Broadcast Solutions Inc

Technodolly

The Slider

Opal

Tai Audio

Abel Cine

Gamma Ray Digital Inc

Glidecam

rebotnix Technologies

Paralinx LLC

Rig Wheels Passport

Visual Products

Technodolly

Visual Products

Metropolis Post

Glidecam

Paralinx LLC

The Slider

Broadcast Solutions Inc

CineTape

rebotnix Technologies

Rig Wheels Passport

Tai Audio

Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS

Gamma Ray Digital Inc

Ritter Battery

Willys Widgets

CineLab

Wooden Camera

Abel Cine

Aerial Filmworks

FJS International, LLC

Opal